Politics and Religion

Trump says our military is "depleted" and vows to rebuild it...
BigPapasan 3 Reviews 3255 reads
posted
1 / 39

http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/trump-paints-dismal-picture-of-todays-military

Our military is so depleted that we only have 19 aircraft carriers, more than the rest of the world combined.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/g2412/a-global-roundup-of-aircraft-carriers/

Our arch enemy Russia has only one aircraft carrier which belches black smoke, breaks down, has to be accompanied by a tug boat and doesn't have our catapult launching system.  Instead, the bow is tilted up like a skateboard ramp.

China has one aircraft carrier which they bought from Russia 20 years ago as scrap.  They're building their own carrier but it won't be finished until 2020.

Yes, "depleted."

-- Modified on 12/30/2016 12:25:04 AM

macdaddy1944 51 Reviews 330 reads
posted
2 / 39

The Donald is delusional..

nuguy46 211 reads
posted
3 / 39

Obama took down the military...read the numbers...'50's style phones in nuke bunkers to communicate...10 of 12 USMC helo squads cannot fly due to parts shortages... ask the military leaders...they tell a much different story than the so-called experts on this board.

voyager-43 11 Reviews 310 reads
posted
4 / 39

If you have 19 screwdrivers and no hammer, but you need to drive a nail, do you figure you have enough tools?  
Pretty sure Trump is going to pay close attention to his SecDef, Gen Mattis.

followme 391 reads
posted
5 / 39
followme 340 reads
posted
6 / 39

food as a comparison.  

to reply in kind you are comparing apples to oranges.

 
You're Welcome
In Moocher We Distrust

 
BTW are they putting marshmallows in the hot cocoa at the soup kitchen for the holidays?

brooks5 178 reads
posted
7 / 39

Putin

Vlad only got so much jam! ;)

-- Modified on 12/30/2016 1:11:51 PM

USGrantlover 221 Reviews 408 reads
posted
8 / 39

We wouldn't dare sail one thru the South China Sea in the event of war with China. They'd launch a salvo of 1000 missiles at it needing only one to hit. We couldn't stop them all.  

Btw, only 10 of our carriers are true multi aircraft platforms. And that's down from 11 when your hero took office.  

Would you like to borrow my Janes so you don't look so ignorant next time? Nah I didn't think so.

ed2000 31 Reviews 388 reads
posted
10 / 39

Like all the black lives he's depleted due to his politicization of policing.

followme 274 reads
posted
12 / 39

CVN's are necessary and important in many areas like the PG, The Med. Westpac Japan, Korea and yes the South China Sea too. They travel with some pretty well armed body guards, and a few more (CVN's and body guards) would not hurt

bigguy30 369 reads
posted
13 / 39

The last few comments you posted are really suspect.
Also this one comment in particular shows why you are a clueless.

Posted By: ed2000
Like all the black lives he's depleted due to his politicization of policing.
-- Modified on 12/30/2016 5:11:07 PM

followme 269 reads
posted
14 / 39

the libs/dems were yelling, screaming, cheering and celebrating the demise of the republican party, guess the joke is on them.

Two disgraced DNC chairs within months, the dem president leaving office after 8 years with no real accomplishments and desperately very desperately gasping to secure his legacy, a legacy that is not there, except in his mind of fantasy.
Not to mention he is trashing the place (The place being the United States of America) in a real hissy fit cause he LOST

USGrantlover 221 Reviews 226 reads
posted
16 / 39

They are useful for projecting power in areas not threatened by full scale assault by major powers with land and even advanced airborne missile systems. Aegis is dated but still advanced but can be overwhelmed. They're fat juicy targets in confined spaces against a power lol like China on their "turf." I don't care how many destroyers, frigates we have, which today is not nearly enough, china has a lot more cheap, accurate and deadly anti-ship missiles. In times of "peace" they're useful. In times of war, not nearly so. We need a lot more subs and smaller surface ships today than we do carriers. They're cheaper and more versatile and in the case of subs can choke off the South China Sea. CVN's today are the BB's of the 1930's when it comes to full fledged war. One DF-21 much less a DF-26 with a range of 2600 miles a CVN becomes a floating pyre. We couldn't stop them all. And we know it. I'm not sure even a master naval tactician like Trump would dare sail a carrier battle group right by say Frigate Shoals in times of peace much less time of war. Oh. And the F-35 is junk complicating carrier capabilities even further.  

-- Modified on 12/30/2016 7:45:54 PM

-- Modified on 12/30/2016 10:23:24 PM

USGrantlover 221 Reviews 308 reads
posted
17 / 39

Was that a condition of your "parole?" You'd have to eliminate your idiotic, repetitive child like picture "stories?" They were quite useful actually. Moron.

JakeFromStateFarm 356 reads
posted
18 / 39
bigguy30 238 reads
posted
19 / 39

So please keep making a fool out of yourself.
I love laughing at your stupidity.

Posted By: USGrantlover
Was that a condition of your "parole?" You'd have to eliminate your idiotic, repetitive child like picture "stories?" They were quite useful actually. Moron.

bigguy30 425 reads
posted
20 / 39

I love how you keep embarrassing yourself on here.
 

Posted By: JakeFromStateFarm
Just one more lie from our fat fool.
-- Modified on 12/30/2016 9:51:09 PM

bigguy30 296 reads
posted
21 / 39

They keep getting worst and make you sound like a fool.

Posted By: ed2000
Try posting some refutation.

ed2000 31 Reviews 420 reads
posted
22 / 39
bigguy30 336 reads
posted
23 / 39
ed2000 31 Reviews 295 reads
posted
24 / 39

Either have a discussion or quit responding. Shit or get off the pot.

ed2000 31 Reviews 267 reads
posted
25 / 39

If he doesn't post something of substance very soon he will have worn out a very short welcome back.

bigguy30 372 reads
posted
26 / 39

So playing dumb now is not helping your case.
Also making assumptions without any facts.
Just proves why you are missing the point and a fool.

I don't do pot and never have smart ass.
It might explain your own comments on here now.
Posted By: ed2000
Either have a discussion or quit responding. Shit or get off the pot.
-- Modified on 12/31/2016 8:40:52 AM

voyager-43 11 Reviews 280 reads
posted
27 / 39

So, plain to see you never served your country in uniform. Never stood on the wall to defend the Constitution and people of the United States or you wouldn't make such incredibly stupid comparisons.  
Last time I checked, very few farmers are attacked and killed by their wheat crop.  
Do these moronic ideas just pop into your wee brain or do you sit around and strain to come up with these gems?  
Please do the world a favor and donate your brain to science. What's that?? Oh, you already did !!  Fabulous

followme 316 reads
posted
28 / 39

1) Laffy is an acronym …Lying Asinine Fraudulent Fapping Yammerer

2)  He thinks what he sees and hears between the time he goes to sleep and wakes up is true and actually happened.

3) He believes the derelicts who he stands on line with and eats with at the soup kitchen.

Hope that explains it

Timbow 371 reads
posted
29 / 39

https://theaviationist.com/2016/03/01/heres-what-ive-learned-so-far-dogfighting-in-the-f-35-a-jsf-pilot-first-hand-account/
I am a military aircraft amateur photographer and know a pro that works with F-35 guys taking side by shots from a Bonanza. He has seen the F-35 do things a Viper could only dream of doing.  

Posted By: USGrantlover
They are useful for projecting power in areas not threatened by full scale assault by major powers with land and even advanced airborne missile systems. Aegis is dated but still advanced but can be overwhelmed. They're fat juicy targets in confined spaces against a power lol like China on their "turf." I don't care how many destroyers, frigates we have, which today is not nearly enough, china has a lot more cheap, accurate and deadly anti-ship missiles. In times of "peace" they're useful. In times of war, not nearly so. We need a lot more subs and smaller surface ships today than we do carriers. They're cheaper and more versatile and in the case of subs can choke off the South China Sea. CVN's today are the BB's of the 1930's when it comes to full fledged war. One DF-21 much less a DF-26 with a range of 2600 miles a CVN becomes a floating pyre. We couldn't stop them all. And we know it. I'm not sure even a master naval tactician like Trump would dare sail a carrier battle group right by say Frigate Shoals in times of peace much less time of war. Oh. And the F-35 is junk complicating carrier capabilities even further.  
   
 -- Modified on 12/30/2016 7:45:54 PM

-- Modified on 12/30/2016 10:23:24 PM
 

 



-- Modified on 12/31/2016 6:23:13 AM

RiverStark See my TER Reviews 440 reads
posted
30 / 39

so you're comparing apples to oranges. Its not smart to bring guns to a drone fight.

Also, I'm not sure how your laying ICBM stuff at Obamas feet. Our nuke capabilities haven't changed long before he took office. As far as USMC Budgets, talk to the Department of the Navy. The army has brand new equipment coming out its ass.
Posted By: nuguy46
Obama took down the military...read the numbers...'50's style phones in nuke bunkers to communicate...10 of 12 USMC helo squads cannot fly due to parts shortages... ask the military leaders...they tell a much different story than the so-called experts on this board.

RiverStark See my TER Reviews 262 reads
posted
31 / 39

stood on the wall -Check (3 tours)

i agree with his statement.... now what?
Posted By: voyager-43
So, plain to see you never served your country in uniform. Never stood on the wall to defend the Constitution and people of the United States or you wouldn't make such incredibly stupid comparisons.    
 Last time I checked, very few farmers are attacked and killed by their wheat crop.  
 Do these moronic ideas just pop into your wee brain or do you sit around and strain to come up with these gems?    
 Please do the world a favor and donate your brain to science. What's that?? Oh, you already did !!  Fabulous

RiverStark See my TER Reviews 183 reads
posted
32 / 39

Posted By: followme
1) Laffy is an acronym …Lying Asinine Fraudulent Fapping Yammerer  
   
 2)  He thinks what he sees and hears between the time he goes to sleep and wakes up is true and actually happened.  
   
 3) He believes the derelicts who he stands on line with and eats with at the soup kitchen.  
   
 Hope that explains it.  
 
Ad hominem.... IOW, you lack an argument.... move along

RiverStark See my TER Reviews 381 reads
posted
33 / 39

says who?
 

Posted By: followme
The Navy has 10 (active) Aircraft Carriers the other 9 are actually Helicopter carriers and classified as Amphibious assault ships not true aircraft carriers.  
   
 Technology is not a reason to shrink the military  
   
   
   
 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/11/air-force-struggling-with-fighter-pilot-shortage-amid-ongoing-air-wars.html  
   
   
 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/11/air-force-struggling-with-fighter-pilot-shortage-amid-ongoing-air-wars.html  
   
 http://www.navy.mil/navydata/ships/carriers/cv-list.asp  
   
   
 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/24/us-military-decimated-under-obama-only-marginally-/  
   
   
   
 You're Welcome  
 In BrokeBackBully We Distrust  
 

brooks5 292 reads
posted
34 / 39

he's right here

ed2000 31 Reviews 400 reads
posted
35 / 39

Posted By: bigguy30

I don't do pot and never have smart ass.  
Posted By: ed2000
Either have a discussion or quit responding. Shit or get off the pot.

voyager-43 11 Reviews 188 reads
posted
36 / 39

you agree with what ?  The fact that there are fewer farmers now and they are more productive?  True. Not the point.  
That technology can replace people in some functions? Also true but not the point either.
That the military is always asking for more money?  Not true.  The military gets what the Congress and administration gives them. Sure they want adequate manpower, if you served " 3 tours" were you ever shorthanded and that put people in danger?  Sure they want adequate equipment. Were you ever where you didn't have the weapons, ammo or things like batteries for your NODs? Did that put people lives in danger?  That's what happens when there isn't adequate funding. Not talking about having gold plated mess kits. Talking about a country that asks people to put their lives on the line to support them so they can do the job and bring as many home as possible.  
As far as technology. It's great. But a drone has never held ground.  
The comparison to farmers was ridiculous.

USGrantlover 221 Reviews 246 reads
posted
37 / 39

Just because it's acrobatic doesn't mean shit. Relative to its absurd cost, it's a pile of junk. For sure. Did you know a P47 could be built for $47,000? Yet today an F35 costs $150M. Seriously? And to boot it has serious design and performance flaws. Granted, most new programs do but for $150M each don't you think they'd be few far between? I would think so. Glad your photographer likes them. Let's see how much the israeli's like them by taking more than just two. I'm wagering they'll be begging for Raptors soon enough. They don't have any carriers. That I am aware of. 🙄 Look at the entire picture. I stand by my comment until proven wrong.

Timbow 350 reads
posted
38 / 39

Quote :
The security cabinet decided unanimously on Sunday to purchase 17 additional F-35 stealth fighter jets from the United States. The Prime Minister's Bureau said the new purchase will bring the number of F-35s in the Israel Air to 50.
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.755641
The photograher talks to pilots who actually fly the jet.

-- Modified on 12/31/2016 12:37:07 PM

USGrantlover 221 Reviews 212 reads
posted
39 / 39

"Taken delivery of." My mistake. Let's see how many they actually take. Hopefully by then they'll have the kinks worked out. I take it the $150M per plane price is not a concern for you?  Do you think if offered the F22 they'd of still taken the F35? I don't.

Register Now!