overtly Republican and that opposing views can not even have a voice.  USA-USA-USA........

How Very Republican.

I will leave you to yourselves.

M

Please don't leave ..I don't want to have to use a alias and change my views just so I will have someone to argue with!!

how can it be the "entire" board when you are posting here? Just a tad over the top, no? But consistent with the approach you've taken in most of your posts.

Besides, we're not overtly Republican. We are rightwing sex addicts. Avenger said so.

Do we need to call another meeting to order? And is anyone still following his blob antics? And have I asked enough rhetorical questions for one post?

Would it be cheesy to start a club that calls and makes appointments with verified rip offs and NCNS?

I thought about it after I posted and relized that was a bit extreme....

"entire" is certainly over the top.  However, most of the posts I have read on this board are equally as lavish.  

I have made a total of six posts on this board....so I guess your conclusion that "most" of my posts are over the top is correct.

You can be sure I won't offend again

XO
Melanie

-- Modified on 9/8/2008 6:59:16 PM

Thats OK though .. She wouldn't make it here anyway without some sense of humor...

then what's the point?

I would tend to agree with your main interpretation; the majority of the most active posters currently are Rep supporters, but that wasn't always the case here. Perhaps it goes in cycles. It doesn't change as often as the weather in DC, but it will probably swing back again the other way at some time.

considering I've been called a WK on more than one occasion? LOL

The more conservative posters have done nothing but express their views, but somehow the left construes that as "opposing views can not even have a voice."  

I don't know when anyone was prohibited from posting.  There are a slew of people who represent the other side.  

Of course, if anyone says anything that disagrees with the left, the world is coming to an end.  I would wager that the left is far less tolerant of dissent than the right.  Look what happened to poor Lieberman.  He has a solid Democratic record on 90% of the issues you can name: Labor, education, civil rights, abortion, etc, etc, etc.  He disagrees on one position and he is out on his ass.

When he ran for his first term I was at a meeting where they had lawn signs for Schwartzeneger, who turned out to be a disappointment.  

In any event, I said I would take one.  The guy suggested I take a few, and I said I only had one house.  (Unlike Clooney, Madonna, et al.)  He said to take several, because they wouldn't last.  He was right.  Each on lasted a day.  There are Obama signs in my area that have been up for months.  

Funny how he could predict they would not last.



How very Democratic.

"You can be sure I won't offend again"


We've heard that from regulars on this board but they always come back, even when they don't realize how long they were gone..
I am not speaking for who you are spoken to.
No offense taken from my end..
You will like me a lot better after I am off Cheneys payroll and my new boss makes me use a different alias.

that have fled this board claiming it is only a haven for RWSAs. I admit this board has shifted to the right in recent months, but when this board was dominated by lefties I don't recall conservatives leaving in droves sniveling about how the lefties shouted them down everytime they made a dissenting post.

It wasn't that long ago that anyone posting anything even remotely conservative was met with a calvacade of posts by outraged lefties claiming calling them Fascists or Nazi's or worse.

"He was right.  Each on lasted a day.  There are Obama signs in my area that have been up for months.  
Funny how he could predict they would not last.
How very Democratic."


 Same thing on the EC.  A couple lefties might disagree but as a whole the left is immature and quite anarchy inclined..Kind of like the dude in The Crow{Brandon Lee version} always starting fires.. or young Islamic radicals without the Religion..

I am new to this board and all of my posts can be seen in the last few threads.  I defy you to actually read the responses that I have received from conservative posters and characterizing them as just as simple expressions of opposing views.  Many (perhaps the majority) are straight attacks.  They are not even attacks of my views or my expressions, but attacks of things that have nothing to do with me.

I dare you, go ahead, read 'em.

has been a rough and tumble place.  If you put an idea out there - be it Dem or Rep, lib or conservative, it will be challenged.  Sometimes the poster will be attacked (I have been attacked - and I have attacked).  

That is the way this board works... notice at the top of the forum... see the mod?  There ain't none... most mods run screaming from the room....  all sides claim that they have been treated unfairly...  and guess what - they probably have been, but then they only go on to treat others unfairly - IT kind of balences out..  no disrespect, but you do need a thick skin to stay here - and participate...


but lets recap - JUST because I support enforcing immigration laws - I've been called a racist.

Just because I can intellectually justify presentation of BOTH evolution and ID - I am called ignorant.

Just because I support Stem cell research - I am called unChristian... and so on...

Just because I support freedom of choice on abortion - I am called a baby killer

so you see, any position will offend some...  

And why did you post this?  If you want an opposing view then by all means post away - create your own threads on issues, support them with facts - and back them up with references... a few months back, on the issue of global warming - I wrote several pieces that layed out Some of the scientific evidence that would teach the oppostite of global warming - articles published in scientific journals - I also quoted several climatologists who went on record to state that EVEN IF global warming was actually happening - that they would question that it is cause by man...  only to have those who had the opposite view - call me names....

After that, I don't go into as much depth in my quotes reviews, and annotations...  why?  Cause most on this board with an opposing view - just call names....  and I figure that their vocabulary is limited because they are either stupid or ignorant - Ignorant we can fix.... but stupid - well - that's with ya for life.


So you see, the door swings BOTH ways.

-- Modified on 9/9/2008 8:22:05 AM

Don't worry about offending anybody on this board, because they don't worry about offending you or anyone else!

I'm a very strong and vocal supporter of Israel. I'm also a strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment. For these views, I've been called a conservative right wing extremist on this board.

In my view, the Bush Administration has done tremendous damage to the US economically, as well as the image of America as a world leader. I am very strongly pro-choice, and believe the government should be responsible for its citizens who are unable to fend for themselves. For these views, I've been called a liberal left-wing looney toon on this board.

So somehow, I've managed to offend just about EVERYBODY at one point or another.

I'm also a bloviating windbag who likes to read his own writing... oh wait... that statement can be applied to almost EVERY regular contributor here, be they right, left, center, or from somewhere nearer to Betelgeuse than Boston.

It can be very frustrating when you are as sane and rational as I am (please note, my tongue is firmly planted in cheek at this point) to read some of the stuff I read in here, but at the end of the day, we all have control over our actions, so there must be a reason we're all here.

Vote for America! Vote None of the Above!

-- Modified on 9/9/2008 10:16:20 AM

I believe if you haven't offended everybody on this board at least once you've got to be one of those koolaid drinkers that has no independent thoughts of your own. I am sure that I have offended at least as many people here as you, if not I'll try harder(and drink more) lol

I would love to vote for "none of the above" but in my opinion that would be the same as a tacit vote for Obama and I just couldn't live with myself if I did that. Voting for McCain is the only way I can vote against Obama.

read our own writing... so  lets take a poll of this board!  shall we???

1) How many read and reread their own posts?  Erudite pieces of intellectual wit that they are....

2) How many wish to get the last post in - no matter they even agree with the last poster???

3) How many have had their reference material rebuked because it was considered either too left or too right a source?

4) How many like the rough and tumble nature of this board?

5) How many are tired of the alias nature of some of the posters....?

6) Does the use of an alias give either more or less credence to the posters writings...?

-- Modified on 9/9/2008 10:35:11 AM

1. I read and reread my stuff because I forget what I wrote and if I have to follow up I want to avoid contradicting myself.

2. I never read my own stuff.

3. I don't care about getting the last post in.

3A. I don't source anything. I make it all up.

4. I prefer to rough and tumble with girls. They smell good.

5. Double aliases are bullshit.

6. Alias posts have no credibility in my view.

What's wrong with debate without attack?  You seem to be defending attacks.  I just don't get it.

"Just because I support Stem cell research "


I support stem cell research also. I just don't support federal funded stem cell reasearch...
Private stem cell research is going on today..

1. I wouldn't know what I wrote if I didn't read it the next day after I sober up.

2.Doesn't matter to me

3.References...Mylan Larue , Angelina ,  Hot Christine,Jin ,Sunshine,Tess..  If you need more let me know..Do UTR providers count as references if I can't use their names?

4.I liked it better before so many libs surrendered and left..Its too mellow now with so many non lefties ..

5.. I tend to skip a lot of alias posts.

6. no difference ..there is no credence in politics or religion

"What's wrong with debate without attack?  You seem to be defending attacks.  I just don't get it."

  sometimes posters go on and on and on and on saying the same thing...basically its time for a attack..By the way I apologize for calling you a Hilers army Kraut..I forgot you are a old Kraut from the first WW your country  started ..