So why not?

Another talk TV host.  If she was American Indian, a lesbian, or Jewish I think you would have a chance.  

at least she has a brain and can actually make sense when she talks unlike this mumbo-jumbo artist we have now..

All we need is another celebrity TV star as POTUS.

While the Clown's sons went hunting and killing lions in Africa, Oprah spent $$millions of her own money and built a school for girls so they can have an education and go to college.

I believe latching on to a celebrity for president, particularly at this stage of the game, feels too much like just joining another cult following; this time on the Democrat side of the aisle instead of the Republican.

Ophra or Bernie? Oprah or Elizabeth? I'd take Oprah in a nanosecond. Oprah is rich. No, she is wealthy. A big difference. Once you have some money, you don't want a Bernie type fucking with it., even if you're an Oprah.  

Then why not.Morality,decency,ethics,integrity, died a year ago.

even my real life colleague acknowledged this today. The Dems will vote vote a non politic like Oprah in 2020. Tom Hanks would be better than Oprah but he's male, old and white.  

You meant Andrew Cuomo.  But you were too dumb.  As usual, Chimpy. Go away.

Talk show host or reality star, can't be any worse then what we have now. We tried the non-politician, problem we have the wrong non-politician in office. After all of this nonsense that we're dealing with now, I don't think trump was what some had in mind when we wanted a "Non-Politician".
But I doubt she'd run.

...In answer to your question annon YES, that craziness was demonstrated by the Nov. 2016 presidential vote. Oprah preaches a respect for people that is so absent at all current levels of government around the world & wouldn't that be a refreshing change in Washington D.C.  Especially in our own White House that would see people starve & go without healthcare while giving tax breaks to the upper brackets. If this craziness continues & Oprah agrees to run Trump is out, the only ways she could lose to Trump is if the democratic party had a split vote. Maybe what we choose to define as crazy is just a demonstration of a new reality, a different way of people making decisions, frankly I hope not but the way our world is changing who can predict which way it will go.

Wrestle-mania crowd vs. those like the girl putting a Posy in the National Guard's rifle at Kent State. However, I can't say that I'm all that optimistic that she would win.

We need someone who will be acceptable to both sides. Not that such a thing is possible in this toxic climate. Unless........... *
Otherwise, our next election will see a sundering of this country that would have been unthinkable as recently as 20 years ago and will make the Civil War look like a weekend at Bernie's or a failed Occupy Wall Street rally by comparison.
Taking as an example two of the extremes of this discussion site, I can't think of anyone in today's political spectrum that would be acceptable to the Left and Right. Is there ANY common ground between these two?  
Is there any subject upon which Laffy and followme for example, might agree?
Or Quadseasonal and his polar opposite bigguy30?
Find common ground between all four, and you might have a solution.

Yes, while ISIS, Taliban, Al-queda, North Korea and others lines up to destroy the US, we'll all be in government mandated psychotherapy clinics courtesy of Oprah, whose a closet left wing dictator sorry I meant to say: therapist in chief.

And everybody in the audience today will get a new car.

How'd the woman thing work for you last time?

It's amazing how your responses keep exposing you.

Nuthin, NADA, you're about as empty as they get!