Politics and Religion

A little perspective.
inicky46 61 Reviews 522 reads
posted
1 / 31

"Yesterday, about 7800 evacuees left the Kabul airport. About 28,000 have been evacuated since August 14.

Interestingly, much of the U.S. media is describing this scenario as a disaster for President Biden. Yet, on CNN this morning, Matthew Dowd, who was the chief strategist for the Bush-Cheney ticket in 2004, noted that more than 20,000 people have been evacuated from Afghanistan without a single loss of an American life, while in the same period of time, 5000 Americans have died from Covid-19 and 500 have died from gunshots."

inicky46 61 Reviews 28 reads
posted
3 / 31
gentleguy1020 38 Reviews 28 reads
posted
4 / 31

Both the guests pointed out how actually we are ding much better than what the media is portraying.
Matthew Dowd was ripping Dubya for where the blame really belongs!

inicky46 61 Reviews 31 reads
posted
5 / 31

Dubya's crew said no according to The Times.
"When American bombs began to fall in Afghanistan after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, many Taliban members fled Kabul within weeks and soon the group was reaching out to Hamid Karzai, who would become the country’s interim president: They wanted to make a deal.

But Washington, confident that the Taliban would be wiped out forever, was in no mood for a deal.

Almost 20 years later, the United States did negotiate a deal to end the Afghan war, but the balance of power was entirely different by then — it favored the Taliban.

For diplomats who had spent years trying to shore up the U.S. and NATO mission in Afghanistan, the deal that President Donald J. Trump struck with the Taliban in February 2020 to withdraw American troops — an agreement that President Biden decided to uphold shortly after taking office this year — felt like a betrayal.

Now, with the Taliban back in power, some of those diplomats are looking back at a missed chance by the United States, all those years ago, to pursue a Taliban surrender that could have halted America’s longest war in its infancy, or shortened it considerably.

— Alissa J. Rubin"

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 31 reads
posted
6 / 31

that they don't know how many Americans are still in Afghanistan.  If you don't know how many, then you don't know who they are or where they are, and if you don't know who or where, how the fuck do you rescue them?  

gentleguy1020 38 Reviews 34 reads
posted
7 / 31

These Republicunts will not put the blame there.
Matthew and the other guest made an additional point: Mosty the same people that advised Dubya and Obama are criticizing Biden. But they are the one got it wrong over and over, why should we listen to them?

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 28 reads
posted
8 / 31

agreement, but why didn't he find out what Trump's plan was for handling the logistics.  All he had to do was ask around to people in Trump's administration.  It was NOT a BFS.  No, the reason this is a clusterfuck is because the LEFT will not do anything where Trump might get some of the credit, so they are going ahead with NO plan rather than use Trump's plan.  

 
The only way to save this debacle now is to mount a crushing military action against the Taliban.  Unfortunately some friendly lives will be lost who are in harm's way, but it will save tens of thousands more in the long run.  If we can take out a general riding in a car, we have enough precision in our firepower to limit collateral damage to a minimum.  

inicky46 61 Reviews 33 reads
posted
9 / 31

And stop beating off imagining Americans dying.

inicky46 61 Reviews 41 reads
posted
10 / 31

And there was zero cooperation between the Trump administration and Biden's team for weeks?
You have your answer.
Also, your military prescription is lame, hollow and simplistic. Makes one wonder if you were ever in the military.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 34 reads
posted
12 / 31

of what can be accomplished with overwhelming force in a matter of days.  Trump would have the balls to do it.  Biden doesn't.  Remind me again about YOUR military service?  

 
After January 20th, and all of Trump's guys were out of a job, Biden COULD have hired a few of his guys to help his team set up the Trump evacuation plan, but they didn't want to do anything that even looked like Trump knew how to do it and the Biden administration didn't.  Trump told his people not to cooperate during the TRANSITION.  After January 20th, a lot of them were free agents looking for work.  Nice try to blame Joe's lack of leadership on Trump.  

cks175 52 Reviews 10 reads
posted
13 / 31

Hell, he even bragged our troops were mercenaries with, "Saudi sent me a check to send them over there."
The Saudi’s reimburse the US Treasury the salaries of US troops stationed in country who are supporting Foreign Military Sales programs. This has been the status quo since 1973, if not earlier.  They are military advisors, not mercenaries.

inicky46 61 Reviews 51 reads
posted
14 / 31

Desert Storm was NOT "accomplished with overwhelming force in a matter of days." It took MONTHS of military buildup and WEEKS of bombing before the final, 100-hour ground assault. Now, please stop playing the military expert. It just makes us more certain YOU never served.
Here's a brief summary. Now educate yourself:
"The Gulf War (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991), was a war waged by coalition forces from 35 nations led by the United States against Iraq in response to Iraq's invasion and annexation of Kuwait. The war consisted of two phases the first was codenamed Operation Desert Shield (2 August 1990 – 17 January 1991) for operations leading to the buildup of troops and defense of Saudi Arabia. And the second was Operation Desert Storm (17 January 1991 – 28 February 1991) was the combat phase.  
The initial conflict to expel Iraqi troops from Kuwait began with an aerial and naval bombardment on 17 January 1991, continuing for five weeks. This was followed by a ground assault on 24 February. This was a decisive victory for the coalition forces, which liberated Kuwait and advanced into Iraqi territory. The coalition ceased its advance, and declared a ceasefire 100 hours after the ground campaign started. Aerial and ground combat was confined to Iraq, Kuwait, and areas on Saudi Arabia's border."

cks175 52 Reviews 18 reads
posted
15 / 31

The Saudi’s reimburse the US Treasury the salaries of US troops stationed in country who are supporting Foreign Military Sales programs. This has been the status quo since 1973, if not earlier.  They are military advisors, not mercenaries
The Saudis have been reimbursing the US for advisor salaries since 1973 via various Foreign Military Sales packages over the decades.

What you are referring to is a Trump quote regarding an increased troop presence in Saudi in response to Iranian/Houthi aggression. Trump claimed the Saudi’s had already sent the US $1B. As you pointed out in your reply, MaddowBlog investigated and asked the Pentagon to confirm Trump’s statement.

From Laffy’s link, the Pentagon’s response:
...Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Rebecca Rebarich said, "The Department of Defense has engaged Saudi Arabia on contributing to US activities that support regional security and dissuade hostility and aggression."

But the statement did not specify whether any sort of financial transaction took place -- on the contrary, it said that "discussions are ongoing to formalize these contributions."
Have the Saudi’s paid for Active Duty US Military Advisors? Yes.
Did the Saudi’s send the US more money for the increased regional security capabilities? According to the Pentagon, as of Jan 20, it was only in the negotiation phase, and not finalized.

LostSon 43 Reviews 31 reads
posted
16 / 31

Posted By: inicky46
Re: Clean the splooge off your keyboard.
And stop beating off imagining Americans dying.
Dude that's TOTALLY your modus operandi whenever you think about the capitol hill Riot.

inicky46 61 Reviews 32 reads
posted
17 / 31

Gawd, you're confused as fuck. But CDL thanks you for trying to come in and clean up his mess.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 47 reads
posted
18 / 31

one year of ROTC in high school.  He was in ROTC because he was a spaz who was afraid to take regular gym class.  Guys like him took ROTC to get out of gym class...and to wear those "cool" uniforms.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 35 reads
posted
19 / 31

Try to denigrate those that did.  When I went for Desert Storm, yes, I was there for about three months before the actual campaign started, but as you say, because you read it somewhere, it was just a few days to push them back into Iraq and recapture the Kuwaiti oil fields, and then I was there another 4 months before it was time to come home.  Its not like we were sitting around, there was equipment to secure and prepare for transport, so we were still busy AFTER WE WON.  Biden leaves Afghanistan a Loser.  We knew about the bombings to soften the targets.  The bombers would fly over us coming and going.  When in a combat area, your perception of the campaign often depends on what part you played.  Obviously, those in armor or artillery battalions may see the ground war differently than those of us in infantry battalions.  I was called up and deployed as a reservist.  By then, I was no longer active duty.  I remember that just about all of us were pissed off at the cease fire.  We wanted to keep advancing right into Baghdad.  Thank you for the cut and paste.  Those that didn't know any of this already should understand a little more from your ability to look up stuff that you have no personal experience with, whether its military service or pussy.  Lol

inicky46 61 Reviews 42 reads
posted
20 / 31

But did you have to be so long-winded and self-serving about it? Because what you just did was ADMIT, despite your supposed experience, that your first post TOTALLY MISCHARACTERIZED the war you say you fought in.
Dude, that's simply beyond embarrassing.
Now please explain how your first post got it so wrong.

inicky46 61 Reviews 44 reads
posted
21 / 31

1) It wasn't "our military equipment." It was shitty old stuff we bequeathed to the Afghan Army. We didn't leave anything we wanted. I saw a video today of some of it, which included a bunch of AK-47s, helmets and radios. The planes were Brazilian prop planes, two ancient C-130s and some old choppers. We can easily blow it up AFTER we get everyone out.
2) If we blew it up with air strikes the Taliban wouldn't have let us evacuate tens of thousands of people without firing a shot.
3) The Chinese have no interest in any of this stuff you complete dimwit. What they have is MUCH better. They have also proven to be shitty at reverse-engineering military hardware they've stolen. Their jet engines are weak and can't adequately power the Russian planes whose plans they stole. Their aircraft carriers are rebuilt old Russian stuff that's 30 years old.
4) You are a poisonous, treasonous piece of shit. Also really, REALLY stoopid. It's one of the few things GaCloaca and I agree on.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 39 reads
posted
22 / 31

my first post of one sentence was not comprehensive enough, and then you ALSO complain when I expanded on my views and you call it long-winded.  If you want to sit face to face sometime and talk about what happened without YOU being the one to have to look things up, I would be happy to meet you.  My first post was one sentence about the war.  It was short.  You admit it was short.  You want to include the preparation and the clean-up?  That's fine.  I was talking about the actual combat, and you know it.  You don't know shit without researching it.  THAT is beyond embarrassing for a guy your age.  

inicky46 61 Reviews 35 reads
posted
23 / 31

A simple apology would have sufficed.
And, by the way, I didn't need to do much research on the Gulf War in order to know the timeline because I was actually alive then and well recall the fine CNN coverage. I was a strong supporter of that war and have long said Bush's stewardship during that time was a triumph.
As for "actual combat" I think the Air Force pilots who flew in over Baghdad for weeks might disagree with you. Face it, you are a REALLY shitty military historian and do yourself no favors in seeking credibility about your service. Now THAT'S beyond embarrassing.

inicky46 61 Reviews 45 reads
posted
24 / 31

1) It wasn't "our military equipment." It was shitty old stuff we bequeathed to the Afghan Army. We didn't leave anything we wanted. I saw a video today of some of it, which included a bunch of AK-47s, helmets and radios. The planes were Brazilian prop planes, two ancient C-130s and some old choppers. We can easily blow it up AFTER we get everyone out.  
2) If we blew it up with air strikes the Taliban wouldn't have let us evacuate tens of thousands of people without firing a shot.  
3) The Chinese have no interest in any of this stuff you complete dimwit. What they have is MUCH better. They have also proven to be shitty at reverse-engineering military hardware they've stolen. Their jet engines are weak and can't adequately power the Russian planes whose plans they stole. Their aircraft carriers are rebuilt old Russian stuff that's 30 years old.  
4) You are a poisonous, treasonous piece of shit. Also really, REALLY stoopid. It's one of the few things GaCloaca and I agree on. Get your head out of your ass.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 35 reads
posted
25 / 31

suffice, but I won't hold my breath.  I always thought that military service was something you respected.  Apparently not.  My DD 214 says I came back from the war 10% disabled, but I never asked for benefits that I was entitled to.  It was my privilege to serve my country.  Go ahead and add another snide remark.  You're starting to look like you-know-who.  

LostSon 43 Reviews 66 reads
posted
26 / 31

Posted By: inicky46
Re: Your capacity to embarrass your self is apparently endless.
A simple apology would have sufficed.  
 And, by the way, I didn't need to do much research on the Gulf War in order to know the timeline because I was actually alive then and well recall the fine CNN coverage. I was a strong supporter of that war and have long said Bush's stewardship during that time was a triumph.  
 As for "actual combat" I think the Air Force pilots who flew in over Baghdad for weeks might disagree with you. Face it, you are a REALLY shitty military historian and do yourself no favors in seeking credibility about your service. Now THAT'S beyond embarrassing.
OH gooo FUCK YOUR SELF you remember the fine CNN coverage? Name one fucking CNN reporter who was on the air at the time? OH wait you will go google that just like you googled the above and posted it like it was yours. P.S. It's from Navy.mil  

Oh and a CNN reporter at the time Christina Amanpour. I actually met her one freezing assed day as we were moving North right before the ground war kicked off. Yeah I was there as well. (It was my first Invasion of Iraq and it would not be my last.) She was actually quite nice to us. Too bad she became a complete libtard later.

Anyway, your sanctimonious hair-splitting and attempt to call someone out who was actually there WHEN YOU NEVER WERE! ! ! Yeah go fuck yourself twice! Then go look in a mirror and tell yourself how it's ok you made the life choices you did and slunk away from serving your nation when it called. What that fuck is that word? Starts with a C and ends with a D? You can google that too...

cks175 52 Reviews 12 reads
posted
27 / 31

Basically, the Saudis agreed to the funding. At the time of the Maddow report, the Pentagon and Saudi officials were working out the details.

inicky46 61 Reviews 38 reads
posted
28 / 31

1) Bernie Shaw.
2) I put quotes around that article so no plagiarism involved. Making you a LIAR.
3) You claim to know things about me but you're WRONG in every case, so go fuck yourself, you lying piece of shit.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 51 reads
posted
29 / 31

proved you didn't know shit about this until you looked it up.  Geez, you copied it word for word and then tried to take credit for how much you know about the Gulf War.   Shit like this insults all veterans, not just me.  Keep that in mind when you dip into your sleaze bucket for snide remarks about military service.  When I was a kid we didn't have an internet for instant research to try to pass ourselves off as educated, so we were encouraged to learn about history.  This revelation from Lost makes you look like a compete fraud when it comes to history.  

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 39 reads
posted
30 / 31

old choppers?.  The Taliban now has more state of the art blackhawks than our ally, Australia.  Why do you think they aren't allowing any more Afghans to go to the airport?  Its because some of them know how to fly these babies and the Taliban needs these Afghans to train other Taliban to fly them.  They will threaten to kill the families of these guys if they don't cooperate in the training.  Get it?  

 
Did you see video of the Taliban army marching down the street, every one of them wearing new black body armor, with new assault weapons, courtesy of Joe?  Was this the "shitty old stuff" you were referring to?

impposter 49 Reviews 73 reads
posted
31 / 31

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/8/7/kabul-blast-claimed-by-taliban-kills-afghan-air-force-pilot
Kabul blast claimed by Taliban kills Afghan air force pilot
"... The Taliban has confirmed a programme that would see US-trained Afghan pilots “targeted and eliminated”. ..."  
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCQnskv7OZ4
Reports: 7 Afghan pilots assassinated off-base
.
Apparently, the Taliban did not get CDL's memo on this topic.

Posted By: coeur-de-lion
Why do you think they aren't allowing any more Afghans to go to the airport?  Its because some of them know how to fly these babies and the Taliban needs these Afghans to train other Taliban to fly them.  They will threaten to kill the families of these guys if they don't cooperate in the training.

Register Now!