Politics and Religion

Sure, it's worth asking.
cks175 52 Reviews 671 reads
posted
1 / 21

Right now, war continues to rage in Ukraine as the government and citizens fight like dogs to repel Putin’s forces hammering the country…

… “If Putin thought Trump was really that supportive of him, why didn’t he invade when Trump was in office? It’s at least worth asking that question if you’re not locked into one intransigent thought,” Maher said Friday night when talking about the war in Ukraine.

He also took shots at both sides of the aisle for making the war about them instead of the reality on the ground. You can watch his full comments below.

cks175 52 Reviews 26 reads
posted
2 / 21

Maher:

Even war in Ukraine has just become another chance to graft our agenda onto someone else's pain. Don't make World War 3 all about you.

RespectfulRobert 30 reads
posted
3 / 21

But ultimately it is an exercise in futility. We will never know the real answer.  
Maybe it took him this long to train and build up his forces enough to the point he felt comfortable invading?  
Maybe he never really wanted to invade as he thought he would get concessions from Biden/NATO/Ukraine that never came?  
Maybe he felt he had an ally in Trump and didn't want to piss him off?  
Or just maybe, Putin is getting older and wanted to regain as much of the Soviet Union back before he passes so he goes down as a hero (in his mind) in Russian history.  
What we do know is that Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 when Bush (the son) was president and I don't remember any Republicans at the time claiming Putin did so because Bush was weak.

cks175 52 Reviews 34 reads
posted
4 / 21

We might never know why he didn’t invade then, but our intelligence services knew he was going to invade now. I’m guessing that the services have some analysis on the “why now?”, but it’s unlikely that would be leaked in the midst of the war. I think it will be a question answered in a historical sense when some of that Intel is declassified or leaked.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 12 reads
posted
5 / 21

You echo pro-Putin talking points. Why won't you stand up against Putin? Why do you ha te American democracy? Talk about being Putin's pussy. And it's been explained to you repeatedly that Putin didn't invade Ukraine during the trump administration because trump was busy trying to weaken and extort Ukraine's president while doing Putin's biding by weakening NATO, the EU, and dividing America. Got it, dummy?

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 10 reads
posted
6 / 21

Tucker and Willy doing a double BJ on Vlad.  That's Willy's wet dream.

LostSon 43 Reviews 17 reads
posted
7 / 21

Posted By: Laffy
Re: Two things:
1)  I've explained why a million times.  One of the few times Maher is an idiot.
If you don’t 5000% agree with Laffy your all fucked up!  

Laffy, Bill is exactly right here. Your TDS isn’t. Not now, Not ever!

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 15 reads
posted
8 / 21

Trump wasn't friendly he was subservient to a ruthless, authoritarian despot.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 28 reads
posted
9 / 21

Tell us how you really feel, Willy.  This time don't hold back. You are one crazy motherfucker.

inicky46 61 Reviews 28 reads
posted
10 / 21
bond007 31 Reviews 32 reads
posted
11 / 21

IMHO, the reason is he thought that Trump was going to pull us out of NATO during a 2nd term.  Which would have made invading Ukraine one heck of a lot more easier.  Give Biden credit.  He kept the NATO alliance together.  Trump wanted to disband it.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 11 reads
posted
12 / 21

party who's majority would leave the country rather than stay and fight if the US was invaded like Ukraine was.   Given the choice of staying and fighting for America, or running away to another country, a clear majority of Republicans and Independents would stay and fight, while a clear majority of Dems would run away in the face of danger.  It rings a little hollow now when Dems accuse OTHERS of hating American democracy.  If you're not willing to put your life on the line for your country, you're not really a patriot.  

inicky46 61 Reviews 13 reads
posted
13 / 21

I assume you're referring to that bullshit poll someone smeared on the wall here recently. I call bullshit on it.
Personally, I'd be happy to give a .45 ACP enema to any Russian or Chinaman attacking this country.
Or to any insurrectionist trash.

inicky46 61 Reviews 32 reads
posted
14 / 21

Not a very big leap, but still. And of course he's also still a raving, raging lunatic.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 25 reads
posted
15 / 21

Willy again demonstrates why he is a racist, misogynistic, chauvinistic, overbearing, tyrannical asshole.

cks175 52 Reviews 34 reads
posted
16 / 21

  Trump wanted to disband it.
Trump wanted a stronger, well armed NATO that was prepared to defend ALL countries in the alliance.  

Under Trump, US troop and weapons deployments into Eastern Europe increased.  

Under Trump, at his urging, member contributions to support NATO increased. In fact, NATO funding was higher when Trump left office than when he entered office.

Trump encouraged Europe to not be dependent on Russian oil and gas and pushed an energy policy that looked to increase US oil and gas production and export. He also SANCTIONED Russia’s NordStream2 pipeline into Europe. Guess who dropped those sanctions? Weak Leader Joe Biden.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 28 reads
posted
17 / 21

1. Actually trump repeatedly told advisors, including John Bolton and John Kelly, that he wanted to leave NATO. To quote Bolton trump said " I don't give a shit about NATO. "

 
2. In 2020 trump ordered the withdrawal of 12,000 US troops in Germany. The Javelin anti-tank missiles that trump eventually sent to Ukraine, after unsuccessfully trying to extort Zelenskyy to announce an investigation of Biden, were sent with the provision they could not be deployed on the front lines against Russian backed separatists so they were stored in western Ukraine.  

 
3. Contributions from NATO members have been increasing sharply every year since 2014 when Russia first invaded Ukraine.  

 
4. Trump did sign a bill in 2017 that targeted Russian energy and defense sectors with sanctions. However the legislation passed Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support in part due to widespread concerns that trump was too cozy with Russia and Putin. When trump signed the bill he did grudgingly and called the bill "seriously flawed ".

Hpygolky 234 Reviews 29 reads
posted
18 / 21

And most his claims have been shot down
I guess if you say it enough you’ll believe it..

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 25 reads
posted
19 / 21

The righties just love to rewrite history.  

Hpygolky 234 Reviews 29 reads
posted
20 / 21
inicky46 61 Reviews 27 reads
posted
21 / 21

Oh, right. He said that himself. He's actually a thinly disguised (at best) partisan hack.  
What an idiot.

Register Now!