on unrelated offenses.

Just scanning the article, it sounds like the normal course of justice:
Investigate, Indict if justified, Prosecute (to a guilty verdict, not guilty verdict, or plea agreement), Plea Agreement, Sentence, Incarcerate.
.
Sounds normal.

But certain partisan hacks need to troll for attention.

Just a timely reminder of who the bad guys were during the 2020 riots of the George Floyd summer.

Armed with an AR and out looking for trouble. His acquittal was one of the luckiest of all time.

captured on video, it's pretty hard to argue it wasn't self-defense even though the hack prosecutor tried.  I hear he has a desk job now as a paralegal.  Lol

He cruised the streets armed with an AR and, if he had't been carrying it he'd never have been attacked.
He's a little cunt and justice will catch up to him some day. Soon, I hope.

For the life of me, I will never understand the left’s insanity on this. What Rittenhouse did was the most clear cut, perfect case of self defense that there ever was. The most obnoxious thing about the whole ordeal was that anyone prosecuted Rittenhouse. As soon as the prosecutor saw the tape he should have dropped the case. How partisan do you have to be to say the guy who was getting mugged by multiple rioters was the one who committed a crime when if Rittenhouse had waited one extra second to pull the trigger he would have been dead. I realize the left are clueless about how self defense works, but c’mon. You’d think you’d guys would figure it out by now. When it’s 3 against 1 or 10 against 1 or 20 against 1, then it’s absurd in the extreme to say that the 1 murdered anyone when an actual mob is trying to murder them.

What was he doing in the middle of a full scale riot? He didn't even live there. Not even in the same state. He said he went there to defend a specific store. But I guess that got too boring so he went out for a stroll with his AR. If you don't think he was looking for trouble you're a naive buffoon. He put himself in jeopardy then shot his way out. He's responsible.

...because everyone knows that American citizens are not allowed to be out on the street when felons are destroying your neighborhood. Rittenhouse went there to help prevent a gas station from getting burned down, and to offer first aid to people injured in the riot. When he put out a fire that rioters had set in an attempt to blow up said gas station, that's when they began chasing him, one of whom bashed him over the head with a skateboard and the other had pulled out a gun, pointed it at Rittenhouse and was about to shoot him. Rittenhouse fired in self defense. Rittenhouse's presence there was 100% legal. Him being assaulted by rioters was 100% illegal. The attack on him was initiated by the rioters. Rittenhouse attempted to retreat until he could no longer do so. It was TEXTBOOK self defense. Like, you can not get a more clear cut case of self defense than this.

Read this.
But you probably won't, since you shrink from actual facts like a vampire shrinks from sunlight.

1) Learn to spell, you militant dimwit.
2) Read the link I posted above. It's a total LIE that Rittenhouse put out a dumpster fire.
3) Take your lies and go back under the rock you crawled out of. YOU are a dumpster fire.

…at this point I assume that 100% of things from “fact check” are lies.

Why not try some of your own research? Oh, no! Then you'd only confuse yourself with the facts.

A “fact check” is not checking facts. A “fact check” is spouting left wing propaganda and calling that propaganda a “fact”. It’s completely Orwellian.

And you probably think Snopes is a Commie rag, too. Just like you smear anyone who provides facts that make you uncomfortable.
Oh, and whatever you do, DON'T put up any of your own research instead of just yelling about "lies." That would take too much out of your busy day pretending to work. What a rebel you are.

-- Modified on 8/17/2023 12:45:41 PM

Like Snopes and Fact Check with peer reviewed scientific research? Journalists can’t even follow their own code of ethics. They lie so much that they’re putting themselves out of business across the board. That’s the gold standard to you? You know what would be neat. If we could take a look at what Fact Check and Snopes said about Iraqi WMDs. Or if Covid came from a lab. Or if Putin order a bounty on US troops in Afghanistan. Or if gun shot victims were dying in emergency rooms because hospitals were overwhelmed by patients taking horse dewormer. Or if Russia stole the election for Trump. Or if BLM rioters weren’t spreading Covid in super spreader events, but that Trump rallies were.

"peer reviewed scientific research." It's a false equivalent. Still, there are objective facts. To anyone but lunatics like you. Basically, you are calling anything you don't agree with "propaganda" or "lies."
Just one more way of lying.
Please stop lying, Willy.

…where after a few months “objective facts” are proven false and “wild eyed conspiracy theories” stop coming true.

And thanks for utterly failing to rebut this rest of my post.
I accept your surrender.