Write Review
2,076,415 Total Reviews 3,406 New Reviews
10,893 Users Online

Politics and Religion

So, how does that work? ;)
mattradd 40 Reviews 1142 reads
posted
1 / 14
Yikes! Trump sets a new record! How low can he go? ;)

I guess all the odds makers are busy with March Madness! ;)

Related Link: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

Strangebrew12 3 Reviews 333 reads
posted
2 / 14
Ha! Your obsession with this topic is quite telling.

How about you give us an update every 4 minutes on Trumps poll numbers because you just supplying them to us thrice daily isn't enough? MAGA rules you and owns you! Toollllllllllll Bagggggggggg!!!!

mattradd 40 Reviews 296 reads
posted
3 / 14
Sorry I'm late with an update. I know it's been much longer than 4 minutes! ;)

It wouldn't surprise me if his numbers tank further! ;)

Related Link: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

mattradd 40 Reviews 331 reads
posted
4 / 14
Well I guess we have our answer; even lower! ;) eom


END OF MESSAGE
Related Link: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

mattradd 40 Reviews 285 reads
posted
5 / 14
Re: Quinnipiac has him down to 37%

Yep! And, job approval can go up and down quite mercurially. However, once your credibility is in the tank, it's very, very difficult to retrieve it.

"In more bad news for Trump in the most recent survey, 60 percent of voters said they believe he is dishonest;.."

And, even his base is beginning to erode: "The poll’s administrator says it also shows that the president’s base is becoming more skeptical of him. Trump’s support among Republicans, men, and white voters dipped compared to Quinnipiac’s last survey. A slight majority of men now disapprove of him, and 14 percent of Republicans do as well (compared to just 5 percent who said they were unhappy with Trump on March 7)."
Related Link: http://www.politico.com/gallery/2017/03/matt-wuerker-cartoons-march-2017-002411?slide=0

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 189 reads
posted
6 / 14
Et tu Fox News? (E)


END OF MESSAGE

Strangebrew12 3 Reviews 340 reads
posted
7 / 14
There you have it. The three stooges have now all weighed in.

Nothing more entertaining than seeing the three of you piss all over yourselves about every fraction of a percent change in DJT's approval. I wonder what Hil-LIAR-Y's approval number is? Do they even have approval numbers for people that shit, I mean, live in the woods? Proceed with the low info voter circle jerk "gentleman" and toss my love to Donna Brazile! Kisses! Muah!!

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 192 reads
posted
8 / 14
It's amazing that you have no shame about your ignorance...

...You have no clue about Shakespeare or what my post meant.

GaGambler 297 reads
posted
9 / 14
Sorry SB, but you got the wrong three stooges.

The three stooges are Hadji, LTM&L and Mattgina.

The three of them seem to post as a pack and with the help of a couple of righties like SS and earl have managed to drown out virtual any actual "discussions" here.

BPS may be just as far left as these three, but at least he isn't the one drowning out all conversation on the board like they are.

Don't get me wrong, I have flung more than my share of poo over the years here, and I earned my spot as TER's "Biggest Blabbermouth" but I have never drowned out actual discussion like the three stooges have managed to do here of late.

At least BFRG seems to be on another vacation from posting, or no one else would be able to get a word in edgewise.

-- Modified on 3/23/2017 10:33:56 AM

mattradd 40 Reviews 192 reads
posted
10 / 14
So, how does that work? ;)

"drown out virtual any actual "discussions" here."

Is there some magic mechanism, that I'm unaware off, that cuts off discussion, OP's, posts, at a predetermined point, that I'm unaware of? ;)

No, I didn't think so. You're just making shit up! ;)

Typically, the discussions you partake in are talking about other board members. You seldom initiate a discussion on a current topic in the news! ;)

GaGambler 282 reads
posted
11 / 14
Nor do I link story after story from Raw Story or the Daily Kook

Those two make Huff Po look "fair and balanced" Just like you make the likes of BPS look objective. At least he will occasionally call out a fellow lefty when warranted. You OTOH won't even comment on the vile shit that comes out of your fellow lefty's mouth, You can't defend it, so you simply pretend it doesn't exist. Even Jake has called him out.

-- Modified on 3/23/2017 11:52:11 AM

mattradd 40 Reviews 256 reads
posted
12 / 14
So, how does that work? ;)

"drown out virtual any actual "discussions" here."
 
Is there some magic mechanism, that I'm unaware off, that cuts off discussion, OP's, posts, at a predetermined point, that I'm unaware of? ;)
 
No, I didn't think so. You're just making shit up! ;)

GaGambler 229 reads
posted
13 / 14
THTTT

If you have any doubt what that means, talk to Jack. Maybe he still an interest in talking to you, but I don't.

-- Modified on 3/23/2017 12:45:38 PM

mattradd 40 Reviews 288 reads
posted
14 / 14
I'll take that as an admission you can't backup it up! ;)

That there is no mechanism by which people are being crowded out of discussions here on this board! ;)

Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!