Politics and Religion

Re:Lets be clear about just what it is that your advocating
danfrommass 21422 reads
posted
1 / 12

this isnt pro or con on either canidate because its been the same forever all most, did anyone catch the news report last night ,that on the mexican border, they be estimating 1 million people will be caught crossing this year , another million will get by, and alot of the ones getting through arent mexicans...homeland security ??.....this a problem in anyone elses mind??

cameltoelicker 20079 reads
posted
2 / 12
james86 47 Reviews 19662 reads
posted
3 / 12

I agree.  One of the fundamental characteristics of a nation-state is the ability to control one's own borders, and by that measure, the United States fails.

That having been said, whenever anyone wants to do something about it, they are condemned (usually by the Far Left) as nativist, racist, or worse.  Further, there are many on the right --- a view to which I am not unsympathetic --- who view immigration positively.  Couple that with labor unions that want to collect union dues from immigrants, businesses that want to exploit them as cheap labor, and Demoncrats who want them as part of the Liberal plantation, and it's difficult to imagine a consensus for border control.

I would like to see expanded legal immigration ... and armed guards shooting those who attempt to enter illegally.  Harsh, to be sure, but if you don't like it, give me an alternative.  I'm willing to listen.

cameltoelicker 20582 reads
posted
5 / 12

your comment on gays has what do do with the possibility of terrorist using the sieve like mexican/usa border to gain access here ????
  the pretender in chiefs "liberal" policy of general amnesty has exploded the numbers getting or trying to get through ! must be a payoff to farmers and buisnesses in texas needing cheap labor, why worry about outsourcing outta country when bush is letting them come here and take our jobs.
 james , for once we agree , would stand beside you and shoot all trying to enter illegal...they want in , follow the guidelines for doing it !!

sdstud 18 Reviews 23468 reads
posted
6 / 12

Clearly, the folks who create all those opportunities that make the folks want to illegally cross our borders to find a better life are the ones at fault here.  Of course, an awful lot of those folks would be Republicans, you know, the folks who own the hotels, and agriculture combines, restaurants and ranches (hey, maybe this would give us a reason to execute Bush - LOL!) plus, folks who hire gardeners, nannys, etc.  

Note, obviously, I'm joking.  But it is simply unbelieveable that you're apparently NOT joking about shooting to kill at the border.  Clearly, these folks who are coming here are responding to opportunities that AMERICANS are knowingly creating for them.  How you can advocate KILLING them, when it is US who have created a system that incentivizes them to come here, for OUR benefit to exploit them for cheap labor, simply points out your arrogance and inhumanity.

llcar 9 Reviews 17518 reads
posted
7 / 12

when a method is applied succesfuly to solve a problem the next step is to apply the same method towards other problems.  It's quite obvious that James86 is not a proponent of the Gay population.

So, is your concern with terrorist or ``letting them come here and take our jobs''.   Guess your upset about losing your job as a farm worker.


cameltoelicker 16294 reads
posted
8 / 12

i dont speak for james , and dont propose to know his views on all subjects...clear ?
  9-11 , perpertrated by terrorists , most here illegal....clear ?
 photographing and fingerprinting people from other nations kinda sounds friggin stupid when you got a couple million people jumping the fence at the mexican/usa border....clear?
 think maybe the people wanting to attack us dont know this....clear ?
 sorry to have distracted you from the main point of this thread , by putting little sidebar comments in there , care to respond to your lack of concern on this (THE BORDER ONE) ( in case ya forgot already) issue..ever hear of a suitcase bomb , biological agents..........yes please state my paranoia , sounds about as silly as that story of flying jumbo jets into very tall buildings...ludacrous
 so in response to "if one method solves one problem , use it on another"....i couldnt agree more , that is silly and like i said i dont speak for james , nor have i agreed with him on anything b4 , that being said , it was a pretty slanderous thing to insinuate upon him.
 something needs done down there!

llcar 9 Reviews 24037 reads
posted
9 / 12

as far as putting little sidebar comments in there I guess I was considering this thread as part of the apparent general theme - Let's just kill em all.  The scary thing is that once any group is dealt with in the manner suggested (killing - sort of sounds like the view of the Islamic religion) then no one is safe - Yes, no one.  Hate begets Hate.

Regarding James86, I don't care.  Clear.

sdstud 18 Reviews 18116 reads
posted
10 / 12

You are talking about shooting to kill many many of the poorest, most desperate people on earth, people who are simply looking for a better way of life for them and their families, and who are simply trying to take advantage of economic opportunities that WE AMERICANS are creating to lure them into our country.  Simply because they are desparate to improve their lot in life, and they CAN'T get into the U.S. legally.

And, in terms of sheer numbers, you would probably be killing maybe 1000 of these poor desperate folks, who share the same yearnings and ideals that made this country great, including hundreds of their COMPLETELY innocent children, for every actual terrorist that you would be preventing from crossing the border.

You should be ashamed of yourself.  I know I am personally ashamed that anyone who advocates this position could actually be a member of the same species that I am.

Oh, and, BTW, the actual Terrorists would almost certainly have access to forged documents and could probably still get across the border LEGALLY (albeit with falsified papers), if we were to impose this type of draconian sanction on ILLEGAL immigration.  So this is not only incredibly inhumane, it would almost certainly be ineffective as well.

danfrommass 16923 reads
posted
11 / 12

I dont believe we should be shooting every man woman and child that is entering the good ole us of a  looking for a better life!
     I think doing nothing is even worse , sdstud , I love your posts  , but 1 terrorist for every 1,000 "illegal" immigrants  ? Hmmmmm , lets change that to 1 terrorist for every 10,000 "illegal" immigrant that gets through , that adds up to 100 terrorists , do you recall what 18 terrorists did a couple years back ?? I sure hope it dont take more of our men . woman and children getting fucking blown up to change your laxadavial attitude on our border situation, we be at war , dude ! There are legal ways to enter the USA , You just dont start jumping the fence of a nation that is at war with people that are looking to do harm to civilian targets.
   Bush has created more terrorists due to his actions than reducing them. Time to make homeland security mean something!!!!

jack0116533 14 Reviews 18504 reads
posted
12 / 12

It's reasonable to assume that terrorists could come across the border like illegal Mexicans.

But that hasn't been the experience.  The experience is that they get some sort of documentation - student or visitor status, and come thru Canada more often than illegally thru Mexico.

And some are US citizens or long term residents who got their green cards as infants with their parents.

I don't think we can lock down the incredible volume of international traffic that our economy depends on.  Instead, this has got to be approached as a police problem, rather than a nationality one.  I.e., we round up all those interested in containing terrorism, and go out an hunt down the terrorists.

Frankly, I'm more concerned about customs inspection of container cargo.

Register Now!