Virtually everything she does is a fraud. She speaks "black" in front of an African American audience and now whips out the southern accent when she feels that will behoove her.

A buffoon who has zero business even being considered for Commander-in-Chief.  If this battle happens come November, I'm sure I won't be alone in not voting.  Would be the first time I have failed to vote in a Presidential election.  You see, the thing is, in order for it to be a Presidential election, one of the candidates HAS to be at least a little presidential.

.....The GOP establishment would probably prefer to lose the general election in 2016 than have Trump or Cruz as their flag bearer. I do however believe the GOP is heading towards a brokered convention, where either Romney or Paul Ryan will be chosen as the GOP nominee. At that point Trump may well decide to run as an independent taking 30-40% of the GOP base with him and another 10-15% of base support from Hilliary. Regardless of how it plays out on the Republican side, Hilliary will be declared the winner in November 2016.  

Let’s see, the black vote for sure maybe not the 93% he got but certainly 80% plus; the Latino vote for Hillary could be historic if Trump is the nominee; the Muslim vote-um 99.9%; women voters –at least 60%; pro gun safety voters 90%; pro environment 80%; pro Obamacare 90%. Voters who care about experience go for Hillary- no one in the Repub field comes close to her in terms of public, private, executive, legislative experience.

voting for a Democrat for president!  

I was really hoping Jim Webb won the Dem nomination as I would have given him every chance in the world for my vote. He seems like an honorable, decent and well meaning guy which of course means he has no shot in our country. LOL

I guess you conceded all of them as facts.

Old vs new.  

Let's say Trump comes in as the clear winner, but not an outright majority with lets say 40% of the delegates with Cruz and Rubio with 20 something percent a piece and the rest of the delegates scattered amongst the also rans. Now lets say that HONDA is correct and the nod goes to a Romney or anyone else but Trump, clearly going against the voters wishes. In that case, I can almost guarantee you Trump would run as an independent and would do so knowing full well he would be handing victory to Hillary.

Remember in the mid terms the percentage of Jews voting for Democrats dropped some 20%.
And the Iran agreement got 24/7 coverage on Fox as being near treason by Obama.  So you have got to figure any candidate who says "the first thing i would do is rescind the Iran agreement" is going to get some new percentage of the Jewish vote.

For me, it was Webb for the Democrats, and Kasich for the Republicans. I've never been very good at getting my choices past the primaries. And, I will admit, I stand corrected!  

the question you post in the caption rather than what you really meant.  But you lost me- how to you figure that "if the Republicans take 20% of the black vote they will win? " Isn't the black vote what about 13% of the electorate at best?

If the R was garnering 3 or 4 times the norm with blacks, it stands to reason he will outperform with Hispanics and other groups.

Hmmmmm...a third party with those two as running mates? They would garner a good amount of the vote I do believe.

The party would be so fractured, with so much infighting, it would collapse on itself and wouldn't have the time to reunite to beat Hills, imo.

I think the powers that be should respect the will of the voters, unless of course there are two candidates with 30%+ each, in that case grab some popcorn.

but I'd view as a great alternatively.

....in the 2000 NY Senate race:

a few tasty tidbits...

While there a few things I might trust Trump to take on and either succeed or not screw up, his personality disorders put the the rest of the Presidential responsibilities into dangerous hands.

Hey now, that's sexist!!!

"Fiorina is already at 1% and lost all her traction once people got a good look at her."

white, blue collar man in the Republican party being generalized to the general election.

even more so than the Christie/Obama embrace, if Christie hadn't overplayed his hand in that GWB traffic shtuppathon, I do believe he would have a commanding edge over all his competition.

Re: Hey now, that's sexist!!!

and here I was beginning to think I snuck that one past everybody

It looked like a beautiful place, and home prices are reasonable.  High taxes, but high level of services also.

Is a Republican actually calling SOMEBODY ELSE a pos? Sorry loser, your ideas, your thoughts, your goals, and your life are all utter failures. You have lost at politics and you have lost at life.  

trustworthy? A republican? Trusted to what? Destroy the economy? Destroy the budgets of federal, state, and local bodies of government? I'll let you know when a republican comes along who's trustworthy, but that republican hasn't even been born yet so don't hold your breath.

Feel free to keep fooling yourself. You must think Black voters are stupid. You must think Hispanic voters are stupid. You think that if the Republicans share the stage with a Black "candidate" that it will bring Black votes to the GOP? You think that if you nominate a Hispanic that the Hispanic voters will turn out for said token?  
That's laughable as a political policy. Did any of your token black candidates bring Black voters into the GOP? Nope. Have Republicans done ANYTHING to bring Hispanics into their party? Nope. Have the Republicans done anything to drive Black and Hispanic voters away from the gop? Yup. They do it every single day. Every single one of them does something every single day to drive Black and Hispanic voters away from the gop. And you think those voters will forget your hate and xenophobia just because you nominate a Cuban or parade a Black guy around on stage for a couple of months? You underestimate the resolve and intelligence of Black and Hispanic voters. It's voters like you who continually hand the Presidency to the Democrats. Token nominees, convention videos that show black children playing with Republican politicians.... You guys think this is some kind of stage show ala Ronald Reagan where all you have to do is pretend that you like minorities and suddenly they will forget your hard work that drove them OUT of your party. Thanks for handing the WH to Hillary Enjoy the next 8 years as your heads continue to explode. Enjoy!

LOL. That is funny. Republicans hate Obama for being a Democrat and then they accuse him of dividing the country by being a Democrat. Yawn. Republicans don't have anything to add to the national discourse.

Why HRC is condemned for Benghazi and no one says a thing about the 13 Embassy's attacked during the Bush admin.. what's the difference?.. It's a risk that we run in some locales.. Also the request for additional Embassy funding for security was rejected when it came to a vote.. The entire Benghazi thing has been revealed as a political scheme against Hilliary anyway.. FWIW I knew Chris Stevens.. He was the cousin of a friend of mine.. The reality of the attack was terrible.. but to dump the entire thing on HRC is simply politics.. not reality..

Just to help you a bit by quoting a couple of examples from your link.

So it is typical lefty bullshit.

The culprit behind the coverup was not Hillary.  It came directly from the White House and the ridiculous story about the video was thrown at America on the Sunday morning TV talk show circuit by Susan Rice at the direct order of our Commander-in-Chief in order to keep his re-election from being temporarily derailed or damaged.  Hillary was simply following her boss's orders.

is NOT untrue. I wouldn't even characterize it as a distortion. But it IS a diversion from the things that were important about Benghazi so it does twist the whole truth surrounding Benghazi by ignoring  very important factors while attempting to create an equivalency that just does not exist.

...they mean something.  The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies is a conservative think tank.  They shill for conservative causes like WKs and manginas shill for hookers on TER.  

According to this Bloomberg report, he's now eyeing an Independent run.  

who have claimed that Hillary in private attributed the Benghazi attacks to the video. There is no third party witness to any of these statements.

I simply referred the poster to his own link, which he had not read fully. Your doubted source was good enough for the "fact checker". Are you now calling into question the credentials of "fact checkers"?

A shill who chooses to believe the word of his matron over the corroborated ones of the families, where only in his world multiple families stating the same thing does not amount to corroboration. Who chooses to not take into account his matron's lifelong history of lying for personal and political gain. Who chooses to do nothing more than parse words rather than analyze a multitude of other facts available.

She told this fabricated story right to the faces of the grieving family members.  And all four sets of family members have independently stated that this happened.  Could they have lied?  Of course they could.  But why would they?  Why fabricate a story such as this one when their concern is dealing with their own grief?

I said you have chosen “to believe the family members who have claimed that Hillary IN PRIVATE attributed the Benghazi attacks to the video.” So I am lost as why you caption your post with this assertion.

George Stephanopoulos because those two have such a long lasting adversarial relationship. LOL.

you expect the family members to be understanding the tiniest of distinctions between embassies and other U.S. posts in the Middle East???

Lies of omission don't count in your book.

You are actually right on the facts. She most likely did fail to disclose to the families that the film had nothing to do with the attack.

You have almost got it, Mr. Pot. She most likely told them the same thing she said in her public statement-and they misunderstood.

"I join all Americans in saying that we are truly sorry for your loss and very proud of the service of your son."

Her lawyerly parsing of words satisfies you and others like you while accomplishing the desired illusion for the low information followers. For the rest of us that care about reality, well she couldn't give two shits about us