Politics and Religion
There goes another gnat! 
and your author!!!
the camel and strained at a gnat. In the analyses, yours and that of others, I find no value in counting the number of times a person says "I" as a legitimate means of categorizing someone as being a narcissist.
See definition linked to this post.
I do not find it hypocritical to argue the case, with you or anyone else, that counting the times a person uses the word I is not a reliable means to determine whether the person is narcissistic. Nor, do I view it as being hypocritical to use an article that points to the same conclusion. As far as the time spent on the issue, your responses to me, plus the time you spend on same said exercise of counting I's, I would think you got me beat!
Thanks for proving just how ignorant you are!
So, I guess then, perhaps you're saying that you and the researchers, in the article I linked, came to the same conclusion. So, what's the problem. Seems like the only problem is that you wasted your time on what I knew all along, study or no study on counting words; you can't make a judgement whether someone is a narcissistic by counting how many times they say "I." And, that was my second point, and in that you are entirely correct, in part, I was arguing with the PERSON, in that, as I said, if someone had made statements about how narcissistic or arrogant Bush was, because of all the times he says I, I would not have wasted my time in the same exercise you partook in. However, being truly dishonest on your part to claim that I exclusively argued the person, and did in no way argue the topic. "In addition to showing you as a hypocrite, the most enlightening aspect is that it also demonstrates to everyone that you argue the PERSON and not the TOPIC." And finally, you or your argument is so weak that you can not make a personal ownership of your statement, but need to have me believe that whoever reads my words views me as a hypocrite and that they demonstrate "to everyone" that I "argue the PERSON and not the TOPIC." Why do you feel so weak as to imagine that "everyone" see's me the same as you? I have no doubt that there are those who do so. But, I doubt if it's everyone. Making such statements just make you, in my eyes, look weak; it doesn't make me believe you!
"I’ve foresworn psychiatry simply because you really can’t do it at a distance." "Psychiatrists, doctors and others who use their science, or even the global warming folks, you know, you have your expertise, and some people just use it to try to bludgeon other people with their authority. So I decided when I left psychiatry never to use my authority. But let me just say as a layman, without invoking any expertise, Obama is clearly a narcissist in the non-scientific use of the word." So, you can't use his words as an expert, since he's not. Nice try! Still just as dishonest as ever!
You feel you and your arguments can't stand on your and their own, so you have to imagine "everyone" sees me "demonstrating" what you think you see! You have to imagine "everyone" backs your point of view or arguments. Why is that?
LMAO!!!!