Any psychiatrist reading your posts over the past day would almost certainly conclude you have a serious mental disorder.
Please get help!
Or get back on your meds.

those "tadpoles" were actually Wanker's spermatozoa. He's been jerking off again into his shot glass and looking at his jizz under his microscope.

First climate change is causing DROUGHT (last summer).... now climate change is causing too much rain.  WHAT THE FUCK.

You know why fucking flooding is happening.   PEOPLE ARE BUILDING IN PLACES THEY SHOULDNT.

Which leads to draining of wetlands, tiling of natural water holding areas, more concrete pushing water into water sheds, etc.

So when rains do come or come fast.  Places can't handle it.  The natural water catch systems are not there.  Civil engineers can only do so much.  

Remember every roof sheds water instead of it going into the dirt in that 2000 sq.ft. area.  THAT IS RUN OFF that isn't getting absorb into the ground.   Every 30ft wide by 30ft long drive way is water run off not going into the soil.

I wont even go into the farmer that drain tile land to control water and water flow.  

it isn't CO2.... it is we are building in places we shouldn't and we keep expanding.

Climate change is causing more extreme weather OF ALL KINDS.
And you are correct re the effects of the draining of wetlands but that does not negate that flooding is also worse because  warmer air holds more moisture than cooler air.

I am not negating more rain.  But flooding is caused by run off.  Draining wetlands, Drain tile on farm land,  making grassland into farm land, more concrete causes run off, etc.

When the ground can't hold water it when flooding occurs, when you dont have a place to put water you have flooding.  

Like I have stated in other discussions.   We have no clue what the patterns were 200 years ago with moisture content.  We have no clue what the patterns were with moisture content 100 years ago.  Get it.  So our scientific data and basis isn't accurate with the whole time frame of "earth".   We have had the tools to measure this for what about 40 years?  What we can measure is loss of land.

So they can tell the moisture content in the fucking air from 100 years ago.   They can tell that it was 89.3 degrees 100 years ago.  They can tell it rained in 1 year down to the 1/100th.    

Records were not kept that accurately, measuring devices were not that accurate, taking data from tree rings, historical documents, etc isn't that accurate.   New parameters are being measured to come up with new logistics and data points.  THAT IS FUCKING SCIENCE.   All that old stuff can give and "idea" but can't be as accurate as today.   Like I have stated before.... There could have been a fucking tornado 200 years ago that could have been one of the biggest EVER but nobody knows about it because it touched down in the middle of Kansas where nobody lived and went 5 miles.  BUT NOBODY WAS THERE TO RECORD IT.    Same goes for rain falls, flooding, temperatures, hurricanes, etc.  

Tree rings, rocks, dirt, etc cant fucking tell you all of this with in 5 degrees..... NO THEY FUCKING CANT.   They are screaming about 1degree or less increase in temperature.  

SO GO GET BENT.

NO THEY CANT.

Hey dipshit....

Do you know when the most devastating hurricane happened in the US History......

it was 1900 in TX.  Do you think they can measure the windspeed as accurate as they can today?  Do you think they can measure the pressure as accurate as they can today, do you think the "scale" they rate everything is the same as it is today.... ie: Category 5 and what not..... FUCK NO.

That is my point.

Also "now" they measure devastation by DOLLAR amount of damage.  Not loss of life.   Back in 1900.... did homes have granite counter tops.... hell during Katrina did homes have granite, maple wood flooring, ceramic tiles, hardwood cabinets, etc.   NO... they have carpet, linoleum, Formica counter tops, chipboard/hardboard cabinets, etc.

But yeah.... again.  I just 'schooled" you with facts.  History is fun once you actually go look into it.

You know SCIENCE is questioning things is how you advance.

Now if you want to get back to the original OP..... Yes humans are causing flooding.  But it's not "climate change".... it is the fucking change they are doing to the dirt.   LIke I keep saying.  Concrete, drain tile, building in places that shouldn't be built, diverting water to places it shouldn't be going naturally, draining wetlands, etc.     Every roof of a home is diverting water away from natural absorption into the ground.

So if you want to do easy math.... for every inch of water that falls is about .6 gallons of water per sqft.   So if a home footprint is 1500 sqft.  That is about 900 gallons of water run off per in of rain.  So if 2 inches of rain comes in 30 mins that is 1800 gallons from 1 fucking home need to go somewhere.  Now think of a housing development with 200 homes.....360,000 gallons of water..... Not to even mention drive ways, roads, etc that is shedding water.  That is all reverted to storm sewers that is reverted to a stream that is pushed to a river.  GET IT.

Again.....

They can't tell that the temperature was 86.43 degree average during July-Aug. in 1921   They cant say 11.41 inches of rain fell from july-Aug. in 1921 and the atmospheric water density was what ever that measurement is today.  

They can say APPROX the temp range was 84-88 degrees or About 10-15 in of rain fell.  But the further you go back in time the brackets get larger.... so 200 years ago the bracket would be 80-90 degrees and 10-20 in of rain.

They have a "data" bracket.  Which is not as accurate as today.   Then with climate change people they are going fucking crazy over a tenth of a degree.  Or 10" difference in rain fall.   WHICH ISNT SHIT when discussing thousands and millions of years.  

Also it isn't "CLIMATE CHANGE".... it is results.  Humans are creating results.  Climate or Weather is happening and what Humans did to the planet are the results.  Like I mention with the flooding.  Same when I talked about the Hurricane.  Seeing more "destruction" because humans are in more locations, things are more expensive, etc.  Same goes for Tornados.   People will say "storms are more destructive or intense now".... we dont know that.  Like I mentioned in 1900's in an uninhabited area a thunderstorm, hail storm, tornado could have hit and nobody seen it.  Hell a baseball size hail could have hit in a 1 mile stretch out side of a town in a wooded area 10 years ago or 100 years ago where nobody lived and people might not known about it.  If nobody is there to measure it.  It melted in 1 day.  Or if leaves are gone they can regrow, or people think the trees died.  Same thing with wind gusts.  Remember many things are "radar" indicated or "gusts" can be up to.  Doesn't mean they get to it.  

Remember Ice Caps melting.... Well now they are gaining ice in Antartica.  Sea levels rising... well they haven't.  O-Zone.... yeah dont even talk about that anymore.   "Climate" people keep changing demographics, measuring sticks, etc. all the time.  

 Just this year they changed how they measure thunderstorms.  It is on a scale of 1-5.  Yeah why did they do that?  What was wrong with the old system?  To make it sound scarier.  or to you know to GET MORE MONEY.   Same thing with winter storms.... now there are 4-5 "models" they base it off of to predict snow amounts.  

So like I keep saying.  When they keep changing how they collect data, how they interpret and measure data, what they are measuring, etc.  THEY CANT BE AS ACCURATE of what was in the past because they are not measuring things the same.

Sea levels....   It all depends on where you get your data.

Again it is "bracketed"   I have seen numbers from 9-10 cm's to 4-8 cm's for the past 150 years in ranges.    

NOAA hasn't been keeping direct or EXACT numbers until 1993... via global satellite.  

You know how they used to measure "sea levels" well actually TIDAL MOVEMENTS. Back in 1807 Thomas Jefferson wanted to study it.  He made them use LADDERS.  Yeah wooden ladders.  That was the "unit" of measure.   Then in about mid 1800's they used a bobber system that would go up and down and used a "pencil" that drew on a paper drum.  Well that could be affected by waves.  But again getting more accurate.   But you should be getting the point.  It is no where near as accurate as things are now.  Also tidal movement is different all around the world.   So how do we know what it is like in another part of the world? Or when they started to "Measure" or accurately measure things. The earth isn't a fucking bucket of water and if you "splash" some out at one end it lowers it all over the rest of the world.

You also know that SEA LEVELS are connected to underground aquifers of fresh water too.

Yeah... Science and history are fun especially when you put them together.  

Like I stated.... it isn't CLIMATE CHANGE.... weather is happening naturally.  It is the results are man made.

We know global temperatures are rising. We know sea levels are rising.  We know storms seem to be stronger.  And we see the rise in global temperatures since the start of the Industrial Age. But what we DON'T know is to what extent the rise is also fueled by a natural rise in temperatures that is simply part of a natural cycle.
So what do we do about it? The rest of the world is pretty sure we need to do what we can to moderate whatever part of the rise is caused by human activity. What's so hard about that?

… weather is happening naturally.  It is the results are man made.”

 
I don’t understand that sentence.  The results of WHAT are man made?

 
I think it should read: “Man is fucking with the Earth.  Weather is happening “naturally” as a reaction to Man’s fucking with the Earth and the result is CLIMATE CHANGE.

men began paying for pussy.  It's called the Whorocene Period.

It is because you are doing the typical fucking media thing.

Taking a snippet of what I wrote.   IF you read the whole thing you can see what I am talking about.

What humans are doing to the earth... like more concrete, tiling of farm land, draining of wetland, etc is causing more water shed which can cause more flooding.  So when weather happens naturally...the result of more flooding is man made.    So when weather happens naturally and a hurricane hits in an area that wasn't inhabited by humans and destroys a city.... the "Mass destruction" it causes is because MAN MADE a city, IF NO CITY NO MASS DESTRUCTION.  Same goes for a tornado that would have been in a empty plot of land, now hits a trailer park.  Yes human advancement is happening.  BUT IT ISNT CHANGING WEATHER.    

If the 100mph winds hit in an area and there is no building it causes little to no damage.  If there is a building there it does damage and the size, cost, etc of that building determines the "amount" or how "catastrophic" that storm is.  

Forest fires happen every year.  Big ones that destroy thousands and thousands of acres.  But if they don't destroy homes people really don't talk about them.   Same thing with "climate changers".  They chalk it up to natural happenings... lifecycle of a forest.  The two fires in CA last year was about 37,000 acres destroyed.  In MN they had about 40,000 last year destroyed by a single fire.  NO WORD OF IT.  Let that sink in.  Not saying what happened in CA was horrible and lives destroyed.  But I'm saying IF NO HOMES where there.  It wouldn't have been a story or people wouldn't be screaming about "climate" or MAGA wouldn't have been screaming FOREST MANAGEMENT type shit.    

Weather Naturally Happened.... but the "devastation" was caused because MAN BUILT HOMES THERE.   It wasn't the reason why the winds were 100mph.  IT wasn't the reason it was a dry season.  etc.  The "devastation" was only because there were million-dollar homes there.  If it was grass and trees.... it would have been "a natural cycle".  

Like others have mentioned.  1000's of years ago there were "warming periods".  Are we in that cycle now?

I keep going back to measurements.   How do we know back in the 1800's how people in Japan were measuring things.  There "ladders" of measurement could be different than what Thomas Jefferson thought of using.

Funny two new things I read or saw last night.

1.  "CLIMATE CHANGE" that is happening in CA/Hollywood area right now.   Arsonists are starting fires in the Runyon cannon area.   Yeah.... so when the fires break out don't blame "climate".

2. Scientists just are using "new" measuring technic (which is great) to find out about 2000/3000 years ago an NATURAL phenomenon happened that mass volcano eruptions happened that could have caused a mass extinction to happen.   They measured this by taking samples in fossilized seashells or something like that and measuring carbon levels or could tell the carbon levels of the "air". Which I dont know how they could tell it wasn't explained.  But cool.  Again this is a new tool.  They are trying to point out the reason for extinction was only the carbon levels in the air.... which it could be... or how can they be EXACT?  Remember new tool and a guess.  It could be 100% accurate but they are just using this tool so they dont have a basis to go against it or agree with it.  What I am getting at is someone else might come up with something or tool that could disprove or confirm the findings.  Like I stated it is the first time USING THIS.  But what I am also getting at is that it was a NATURAL OCCURANCE THEY SAID TOOK PLACE.   Like i keep saying.... things happen naturally with mass destruction... but humans were not there to witness, record, or measure them or measure them as accurately or same as they do to today's standards.  ESPECIALLY WHEN STANDARDS CHANGE.

intimidate you from spreading the word that we are in big trouble.   1885 to now is just a blip in the fabric of time.  I hope long after you are gone, you are remembered for the zeal with which you took on Willy and his National Weather Service chart.  What does the weather service know that you don't know, right?  Go get 'em, tiger.  They're just a bunch of cunts.  

After saying you relied on NOAA , you were asked for a specific data point to prove you were right and you give us unsupported data from Kentucky in 1936. It's a good thing you have no credibility to lose.

So, no, I didn't connect the two. You are responsible for what you write and what you leave out. And I guess your "mind" was elsewhere last week when the current heat wave pushed temperatures well into the 100+ range across the entire mid west and southwest.

What you always conveniently "forget" is that climate is weather over time for the entire planet. The Earth is now the warmest it's even been in recorded history.

The world you live on is Earth 2.