Some clueless Dems on this board may have missed this since they’re so easily led by their nose by the media that they keep on believing despite their constant lying. So here are a few things that magically disappeared with little to no fanfare when Trump became President.  

 
1) Mass Shootings. Anyone notice this completely stopped? You see, since Trump is President and he won’t be signing any gun control laws, there’s no need for fake media campaigns to ban guns. So while shootings I’m sure are still happening, there’s no political incentive for the media to sensationalize it. And so they don’t, and you never hear about it.

 
2) Black Lives Matter. Since Democrats don’t have the power and financial resources they once did they have no ability to make up a fake race war for their own political gain. So BLM disappeared. See how that works?

 
3) “White Supremacists” in Masks. Suddenly there’s no more people all dressed alike wearing sunglasses and masks in fake “White Supremacist” marches. These were Feds and with Biden gone they’re gone too. No more using FBI recruits for political purposes.  

 
4) Gay Shit Every Where. No more Take Your Tranny to school day, no more trannys running nuclear safety programs while stealing airport luggage, no more turning the military into a tranny circle jerk, no more kindergartner programs to teach little Johnny to be accepting and understanding of Sodom and Gomorrah.  

 
5) No More Pronoun Bullshit. No more corporate backing of this bullshit. No more government shoving it down our throats. No more delusional people having the power to force everyone else to lie about their delusions.  

 
It all just disappeared like magic. Funny, huh?

Delusional stupidity reigns in the magamoron land of fucking idiots.  

 
Do you think gay and trans people disappeared?  And white supremacists?  Fuck you're so fucking dumb.  

 
There have been 3 mass killings with guns in 2025

 
US white supremacist groups emboldened with ‘ethnic and racial hatred’ as Trump stokes immigration fears
President’s anti-immigrant actions fuel a heartland battle between middle-ground Republicans and extremists

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/22/white-supremacist-groups-emboldened-trump-immigration

 
Fuck you're so fucking dumb

Europeans still talk about it for some reason, but no one ever talks about it here. It’s like acid rain, people just stopped talking about it.

Nope - it hasn't 'disappeared' dumb fuck.  It's still happening.  Right before your very eyes.  Dip shit.  Just because convicted felon criminal traitor is helping to accelerate it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Fuck you're so dumb.

We could dump CO2 into the atmosphere endlessly. And it won’t get a bit warmer. You’d know this if you understood anything about science.

it's existed since the planet formed you moronic fucking idiot

The current atmosphere has only 420 parts per million of CO2. Volcanoes naturally release a shit ton of CO2. Volcanic activity has varied greatly in the past. Enough that it once blew apart the super continent of Pangaea. If CO2 going up moderately could cause THE END OF THE WORLD, then how did all life not perish? For most of earth’s history over the last billion years CO2 was 3000ppm, but was as high as 10,000ppm. We even have ice core samples of it being 70,000ppm. And we know the measurement is correct because all the other gasses remained the same as today.  

 
The fact of the matter is CO2 has a limited capacity to trap heat. After 220ppm or so it becomes *saturated* and it stops being able to absorb any more heat.  

 
The infrared that reflects off earth’s service spans roughly between 5um and 100um, peaking at 11um (it’s a curve). CO2 can only absorb IR at 15um. It absorbs all of it, but only at 15um. Add all the CO2 you want and it won’t get hotter because all the heat it can trap has already been trapped.  

 
It’s like pussy. There’s so much pussy in this world but you can’t tap it because you’re broke and limp. And a million more pussies to this world and you still won’t be getting laid.

Well you would sure know a thing or 2 about that since you're the president of that club.

Again, nothing of substance - and just filthy lies - from another filthy maga traitor cunt. Moron

Nothing of substance is correct. I quoted your own words. And you're right. They were nothing of substance. Just more repeat of the same ole words from  TERs next to be most delusional poster ever. Snowqueen

Look up just two posts ago where I posted information refuting the OP's nonsensical gibberish you stupid fucking MORON.

 
Wrong - you're just completely un-informed. AND living in an alternate reality of delusional stupid  
Delusional stupidity reigns in the magamoron land of fucking idiots.  

 
Do you think gay and trans people disappeared?  And white supremacists?  Fuck you're so fucking dumb.  

 
There have been 3 mass killings with guns in 2025

 
US white supremacist groups emboldened with ‘ethnic and racial hatred’ as Trump stokes immigration fears
President’s anti-immigrant actions fuel a heartland battle between middle-ground Republicans and extremists

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/22/white-supremacist-groups-emboldened-trump-immigration

 
Fuck you're so fucking dumb

Related Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/interactive/mass-shootings/

You're no climatologist and you're so full of moronic bullshit it's comical.  Every single legitimate climatologist (97%) would call your moronic bullshit just that - moronic bullshit.  Fuck you're so dumb.  You think citing incorrect "ppm" numbers makes you sound intelligent?  It makes you look like a fucking MORON. You stupid filthy maga traitor cunt.  

 
Cited below are 18 Scientific Associations on Climatology that refute your nonsensical gibberish.  You dumb fucking filthy maga traitor cunt.    

 
The vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists (97%) agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. This consensus is supported by numerous scientific organizations, including the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and international science academies. The primary driver of this warming is the increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere due to human activities.  

 
It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s climate. This is based on over a century of scientific evidence forming the structural backbone of today's civilization.

 
NASA Global Climate Change presents the state of scientific knowledge about climate change while highlighting the role NASA plays in better understanding our home planet. This effort includes citing multiple peer-reviewed studies from research groups across the world,1 illustrating the accuracy and consensus of research results (in this case, the scientific consensus on climate change) consistent with NASA’s scientific research portfolio.

 
With that said, multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

 
American Scientific Societies
Statement on Climate Change from 18 Scientific Associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2

 
American Association for the Advancement of Science
"Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening." (2014)3

 
American Chemical Society
"The Earth’s climate is changing in response to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and particulate matter in the atmosphere, largely as the result of human activities." (2016-2019)4

 
ACS emblem
American Geophysical Union
"Based on extensive scientific evidence, it is extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century. There is no alterative explanation supported by convincing evidence." (2019)5

 
AGU emblem
American Medical Association
"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthr

 
AMA emblem
American Meteorological Society
"Research has found a human influence on the climate of the past several decades ... The IPCC (2013), USGCRP (2017), and USGCRP (2018) indicate that it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-twentieth century." (2019)7

 
AMS emblem
American Physical Society
"Earth's changing climate is a critical issue and poses the risk of significant environmental, social and economic disruptions around the globe. While natural sources of climate variability are significant, multiple lines of evidence indicate that human influences have had an increasingly dominant effect on global climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century." (2015)8

 
APS emblem
The Geological Society of America
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2011), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2013) and the U.S. Global Change Research Program (Melillo et al., 2014) that global climate has warmed in response to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases ... Human activities (mainly greenhouse-gas emissions) are the dominant cause of the rapid warming since the middle 1900s (IPCC, 2013)." (2015)9

 
GSA emblem
Science Academies
International Academies: Joint Statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10

 
U.S. National Academy of Sciences
"Scientists have known for some time, from multiple lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth’s climate, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions."11

 
UNSAS emblem
U.S. Government Agencies
U.S. Global Change Research Program
"Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities." (2018, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12

 
USGCRP emblem
Intergovernmental Bodies
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
“It is unequivocal that the increase of CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere over the industrial era is the result of human activities and that human influence is the principal driver of many changes observed across the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere, and biosphere.

 
“Since systematic scientific assessments began in the 1970s, the influence of human activity on the warming of the climate system has evolved from theory to established fact.”13-17

 
Now SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU STUPID FILTHY MAGA TRAITOR CUNT

15 years ago Al Gore predicted that the Arctic will be ice free in 5 years. It never happened.  

 
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MsioIw4bvzI

 
I have discussed this topic extensively here in the past. I assure you, what I’m saying is true, and I’m hardly the only one who’s noticed this.  

 
We are, in fact, in a period of near all time RECORD LOW for atmospheric CO2. CO2 has varied greatly over the last 600 million years. But the temperature of earth has only varied +/- 10 degrees C in that whole time. For most of earth’s history it was far warmer than today. It was warmer during the Middle Ages, and at the height of the Roman Empire it was even warmer.  

 
We have evolutionary evidence of this as well. Commercial greenhouses install very expensive CO2 generators to get plants to grow faster. Why? If CO2 is indeed at record highs then why would they need to? The fact is that most plants evolved a photosynthesis process when the atmosphere was more carbon rich than today.  

 
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q2_M7zPEfdI&pp=ygUgMiBwbGFudHMgZXhwZXJpbWVudCAyIENPMiBsZXZlbHM%3D

 
I’ve discussed a lot of the science on this here in the past.

 
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/what-if-what-weve-been-told-about-climate-change-is-bs-426729?frmSearch=1#426729

Storms getting stronger every year, fire season is now all year long, never ending droughts - sure - but keep telling yourself the LIE stupid filthy maga traitor cunt.  

First off, science isn’t done by popular vote. Notice you don’t need 97% “consensus” for Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Or a 97% “consensus” of whether evolution is true.  

 
Secondly, the 97% number that’s always repeated didn’t come from science. It came from a journalist, not trained in science, who grabbed a non-random sample of papers and read the title of the Abstract and put it in the “climate change is real” column. If that journalist knew anything about science she would have done a more thorough search.  

 
Thirdly, storms are NOT getting stronger. They’re fewer storms, not more of them. See graph below.

 
Droughts and fires are due to poor land management. North America used to be home to millions of beavers. We almost drove them extinct. North America evolved with beavers, and their dams charged underground aquifers and prevented droughts and wildfires. Soil hardened from poor management, especially cattle grazing, will be prone to flooding. If soils are properly maintained they don’t flood, they absorb.  

 
The fact is the media has been quiet irresponsible in reporting actual climate science. If you read the real science it’s not so one-sided.

It's a fact you little filthy cunt.  Just because you deny reality doesn't make it not so.  Dumb bitch.

From the article linked below:

 
Debunking The 97% Climate Consensus Myth Touted By Activists, Media

 
MYTH: A 97% consensus [agreement] of scientists say that Earth’s climate is experiencing dangerous warming caused by human activities.

 
THE FACTS: This erroneous and totally misleading figure was obtained from four different studies, all of which were flawed.

 
The first was done in 2004 by Naomi Oreskes, who is not a scientist. She examined the abstracts [summaries] of 928 scientific studies that she had found by putting in the search term “global climate change.”

 
This yielded only 8% of the results she would have obtained from the search term “climate change”, thus leaving out hundreds of studies focusing on natural causes of climate change.

 
The topics of many articles counted in this study didn’t address causes of climate change but, assuming that IPCC conclusions were correct, focused on the influence of climate on the incidence of influenza, the life cycle of frogs, etc.

 
Before publishing Ms. Oreskes’ article the journal editor failed to check either her methodology or her sources. Shortly thereafter Naomi Oreskes wrote a book entitled, Merchants of Doubt, which lambasted climate skeptics.

 
In a 2009 study (Doran and Zimmerman), Maggie Zimmerman, a graduate student, sent a 2-minute online survey to 10,257 employees of schools and government research agencies.

 
This left out over 10,000 geologists, physicists, meteorologists, and astronomers, many of whom were studying the issue. She received 3,146 responses.

 
Yet her 98% figure was based on only 79 responses she had handpicked – certainly not a representative sample. So, this study has been debunked.

 
In 2010 another college student, William Anderegg, identified 908 scientists who had written the most papers about global warming. He considered these to be most qualified to hold an opinion on climate change.

 
“The 50 most prolific alarmists were published an average of 408 times each, versus only 89 times each for the skeptics.” Hundreds of the studies considered had several – as many as twelve – different authors. This misinformation weighted the results against the skeptics.

 
Anderegg failed to consider that the number of published studies doesn’t equal correctness. Studies which reach conclusions agreeing with the official government position on climate change are heavily financed.

 
In contrast, those scientists who study the natural causes of global warming must scramble for financing. This is one reason why these scientists aren’t publishing as many peer-reviewed papers.

 
In 2013, John Cook, who is not a scientist but a professional cartoonist, issued a report to the Global Warming Policy Foundation stating that 97.1% of the 11,944 scientific papers he examined “explicitly or implicitly suggested that human activity was responsible for some warming.”

 
This claim has been debunked by at least four other studies, which found that this definition doesn’t support the IPCC claim that mankind is responsible for most global warming.

 
A study by Legates found that only 41 of these 11,944 papers stated the opinion that most of the warming since 1950 was man-made. It was revealed that Cook had told the publisher of his study the results (97% consensus) before he had even done the research.

 
But science doesn’t operate by consensus. To adhere to the scientific method, scientists are obligated to question all new ideas. In that case, even if this 97% figure were correct (it isn’t), it would be meaningless.

 
When Galileo challenged the scientific consensus that the Earth was the center of the universe, he was met with an extremely hostile reaction.

 
Likewise, Dr. Barry Marshall, who hypothesized that ulcers are caused by the bacterium Helicobacter pylori, was challenged by the majority, who believed ulcers are caused only by stress.

 
Finally, Dr. Marshall empirically proved his hypothesis by drinking a solution containing these bacteria. In doing so, he successfully gave himself an ulcer. For this, he was awarded a Nobel prize.

 
In the early 20th century, Alfred Wegener was scorned and mocked by other geologists for advancing the theory of continental drift, which led to the tectonic plate theory. This theory, the acceptance of which he didn’t live to see, revolutionized the science of geology.

 
Many scientists who had once accepted the global warming hypothesis changed their minds after new information became evident. Klaus Eckert Puls, a German meteorologist, lamented:

 
“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data. At first, I started with a sense of doubt, but then I became outraged when I discovered that what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements.

 
“To this day I feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it. Scientifically it is a sheer absurdity to think we can get a nice climate by turning a CO2 adjustment knob.”

 
In the 2007 Global Warming Petition project, 31,487 scientists (over 9,000 of whom have PhDs) signed the following declaration:

 
“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing, or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”

Article misleads on findings of international climate report

 
Climate Change Dispatch is for conspiracy theorist morons.... DUMB FUCK - please don't bring your weak ass debunked fucking moronic bullshit here ever again. Dumb filthy maga traitor cunt.  

 
An online article claims a major international report on climate change found little to no evidence that global warming causes adverse events or has a negative impact on the environment. But the report shows that there has been a clear intensification of the planet's warming and the toll it has taken on humans and ecosystems.

 
"The Climate Scaremongers: It's Worse Than We Thought!" say the headline of a March 11, 2022 article on the Climate Change Dispatch website about the report from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

 
The report "found very little evidence that our climate was any worse than in the past," the article says.

 
"We are told that human-induced climate change is causing severe loss and damage to human and natural systems because of the 'increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events'. This is all very strange, given that last year's report found no evidence that this was the case," it adds.

 
But the IPCC has clearly established an intensification of extreme weather events in its sixth major report since 1990 on climate change, which some people claim is not caused by human activity, despite the overwhelming scientific consensus that it is.

 
Andrej Mahecic, head of communications and media relations for the IPCC, says the article's "claim is contradictory" to what was said in the first part of the report, which was published in August 2021.

 
It states: "Human-induced climate change is already affecting many weather and climate extremes in every region across the globe. Evidence of observed changes in extremes such as heatwaves, heavy precipitation, droughts, and tropical cyclones, and, in particular, their attribution to human influence, has strengthened since" the previous assessments published in 2013 and 2014.

 
The Climate Change Dispatch article also claims: "Human health, contrary to the IPCC's assertions, is far better than it has ever been, access to clean water has much improved, food production is at all-time highs."

 
This is a misinterpretation of what the IPCC says in the portion of its report on past and future impacts of climate change and the limits of our ability to adapt, which was published in February 2022.

 
Guéladio Cissé, a coordinating lead author of one of the chapters in that part of the report, said: "The IPCC is not denying anywhere that human health is globally (making) progress."

 
Cissé, who is also the head of a research unit in the department of epidemiology and public health at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute in Basel, said the report highlights how climate change inequitably harms human health.

 
"What IPCC is saying is that climate change and related extreme events are mostly impacting health in most vulnerable places of the world and on most vulnerable people," he said.

 
The IPCC found that global warming has already contributed to species decline and extinction, an increase in vector-borne disease, more deaths due to heat and drought, reduced yields in staple crops, water scarcity, and a decline in fisheries and aquaculture.

 
Tamma Carleton, assistant professor of environmental economics and climate change at the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at the University of California in Santa Barbara, said IPCC scientists have also explored what would have happened without the impact of global warming.

 
This does not, however, discount positive developments in food production, incomes and health indicators.

 
"These are not claims about yesterday as compared to today," she said. "The IPCC tells us we are missing out on additional gains that could have been made over the last few decades, had climate change not been slowing progress in these key areas."

 
Food supplies
The Climate Change Dispatch article claims: "The IPCC has no way of knowing the agricultural production and food supplies would have been greater nowadays without the effects of climate change."

 
Carole Dalin, associate professor in sustainable food systems at the Institute of Sustainable Resources at University College London, said the article's assertion is false.

 
"Actually the IPCC has very well-established and peer-reviewed (over several decades) ways of analyzing the effects of climate change on crop yield and agricultural productivity in general," she said.

 
"For example, it is clear that the frequency in extreme heat and extreme droughts events have increased, this can be linked to climate change thanks to well verified models, and it does not even take any model to know extreme heat and drought can reduce crop yield or even fail the harvest altogether. Farmers in many regions including in the US have witnessed it already."

 
This picture released by The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) shows the severe damage to maize crops in Napeikar, Turkana County, Kenya on June 2, 2020 ( FAO / AFP / Luis Tato)
While the Climate Change Dispatch article points out that food production has increased since the 1960s, this does not invalidate the IPCC's assessments.

 
Dalin said: "The IPCC says productivity has increased more slowly due to climate change, not that it has decreased, and this has not happened everywhere."

 
This was confirmed by Toshihiro Hasegawa, researcher at the Japanese National Agriculture and Food Research Organization and coordinating lead author of a chapter on food and ecosystem products. "There is medium evidence and high agreement that climate change has already had overall negative impacts on agricultural productivity growth," he said.

 
Delphine Deryng, researcher at Humboldt University of Berlin and a lead author of a chapter on food and ecosystem products, also pointed to "robust evidence" through independent studies that climate change has slowed down agricultural productivity globally by four to five percent since 1961 for essential crops such as maize and wheat.

 
Deryng noted that the scientific assessments given in IPCC reports come from unpaid volunteers who are simply dedicated "to providing scientific information on the state of knowledge about climate change."

 
'Now or never'
In the report's third and last installment, which was published on April 4, and focuses on the mitigation of climate change, scientists made clear that nations across the world are leading the planet toward catastrophic temperature rises with their current policies.

 
Jim Skea, a professor at Imperial College London and co-chair of the working group behind the report, said: "It's now or never, if we want to limit global warming to 1.5C.

 
"Without immediate and deep emissions reductions across all sectors, it will be impossible."

 
In the report, scientists warn that any rise above 1.5C risks the collapse of ecosystems and the triggering of irreversible shifts in the climate system.

More evidence that you're just a LYING filthy maga traitor cunt that is easily duped by moronic stupidity.  Debunked YET AGAIN - you stupid filthy fucking treasonous loser

 
But the article misrepresents the new research, which does link Larsen C ice shelf melt to human-driven global warming, according to Ella Gilbert, the study's lead author and a climate modeler at the British Antarctica Survey.

 
USA TODAY reached out to Climate Change Dispatch and the Facebook user who shared the claim for comment.

 
New study lists causes of ice shelf melt that are exacerbated by global warming
The study referenced in the article is titled, "A 20-Year Study of Melt Processes Over Larsen C Ice Shelf Using a High-Resolution Regional Atmospheric Model: 2. Drivers of Surface Melting" and was published in the Journal of Geophysical Research, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, in April. It sought to "identify and rank, for the first time, the most significant causes of melting over the recent past."

 
The study identified a number of causes of ice melt on the shelf, including solar radiation; warm, dry wind events (called foehn); cloud behavior and large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns.

 
The Climate Change Dispatch article takes this to mean that human activity and CO2 emissions are not the cause of the melting of the Larsen C ice shelf. But that is not the case, according to the study's lead author.

 
"On the contrary, the paper explicitly notes that climate change is causing temperatures to rise, making melting more common and changing which drivers of melting happen most frequently," Gilbert told USA TODAY in an email.

 
The Climate Change Dispatch article correctly notes that the list of melt factors in the paper does not include the phrase "CO2 emissions," but this does not mean global warming caused by anthropogenic CO2 emissions has no role in Larsen ice shelf melt, Gilbert told USA TODAY in an email.

 
"As noted in the paper, melt occurs only when surface temperatures are at 0 degrees Celsius," she said. "Rising temperatures (caused by increased CO2 emissions) mean this threshold is reached more frequently. This increases the impact of all drivers of melt."

 
Erin Pettit, an ice sheet researcher and professor at Oregon State University, also told USA TODAY that human-driven warming influences melt factors on the Larsen C ice shelf.

 
She explained that, for example, increasing global temperatures change global wind patterns because wind redistributes heat between Earth's higher and lower latitudes. These changes likely increase the frequency of foehn wind events on the Larsen ice shelf, which then increases melting.

 
"CO2 emissions definitely play a role in this," Pettit said.

 
Our rating: False

 
Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that a recent study shows that "CO2 emissions play no role" in the Antarctic Larsen C ice shelf melt. The study lists causal factors for Larsen C ice shelf melt, the effects of which are influenced by human CO2 emissions and resulting global climate change, according to the study author.

Rated somewhere between pseudo science and out right quackery.  Not surprising for a filthy maga traitor cunt to cite 'quackery' - for the moronic fucking stupidity spewed by filthy maga traitor cunts.  

 
Thanks for proving your FUCKING STUPID - you filthy maga traitor cunt.  

 
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation are recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

 
Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks.

 
History
Founded in 2010, Climate Change Dispatch is a human-influenced climate change denial blog managed and edited by Thomas Richard. According to their about page: “Climate Change Dispatch (CCD) is a science and environmental news site showing its visitors the facts behind the theory of global warming, which are not being told by the mainstream media and the global-warming zealots. As noted below*, we do not believe in consensus science. Beliefs belong in church, in prayers, but not in the scientific method.”

 
Read our profile on USA media and government.

 
Funded by / Ownership
The owner and editor of Climate Change Dispatch are Thomas Richard. According to the Climate Change Dispatch about page, they are “100% owned and operated by private citizens, doing it part-time and/or for free. We do not receive any money from oil or energy companies or from ANY organization that receives money from the energy industry.” The website contains advertising and a donation link.

 
Analysis / Bias
In review, Climate Change Dispatch is very honest in that they claim they do not support the consensus of science and deny the impact of human-made global warming (AWG). Articles contain loaded emotional language such as this: Election Slaughter For Climate Activism. This story is a republishing of James Taylor’s article written for the right biased and factually mixed American Thinker.

 
In general, most content on this website is republished articles from other right-biased sources that question climate change. There is some original content published as well that also works to minimize concern over climate change. This source also promotes conspiracies, such as Oxford University publishing fake news. Essentially, this is a website that promotes anti-climate change propaganda.

 
Failed Fact Checks
“Most extreme weather phenomena have not become more extreme, more deadly, or more destructive” – False
“The amount of coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at record high levels”; those claiming the reef is threatened by climate change are alarmists – Inaccurate
“Great Barrier Reef Sea Surface Temperature: No Change In 150 Years” – Inaccurate
Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 11/20/2018) Updated (02/02/2024)

 
Source: https://climatechangedispatch.com

I’m about to teach you something about science, Chinchilla. It’s called falsification. This may seem a bit counter-intuitive, but in science in order for a hypothesis to be testable, there must be the possibly that it can be false. If you can’t test it to see if it’s false, then it’s NOT a scientific claim.  

 
Science does not test for what is true. It tests for what is *not* true. The more things we prove is not true, the more sure we can be that something is true.  

 
So when a claim is said to be unfalsifiable, this means the claim CANNOT be tested by science, and the claim is therefore NOT science.  

 
Man made climate change is NOT science in this same way. The ice could be melting because seals keep pissing on it. Or maybe Eskimos are pissing on it. Or polar bears keep shitting on it. Or maybe it’s rubbing against the ocean floor causing friction and heating it up until it’s melting. Or maybe space aliens are zapping it with lasers. Or maybe there’s fewer clouds over it and the sun hits it more. Or maybe the aliens are pissing on it.  

 
In order to prove man made CO2 emissions are causing it to melt, then you need to have a causal factor, and you need to eliminate all other possible causes.  

 
If you can’t, then the hypothesis is unfalsifiable. It cannot be tested. And it is therefore NOT SCIENCE.

This is spectacularly sloppy work, Chinchilla. If I reference Article A and you post a link “debunking” Article B that I never mentioned, then you didn’t debunk Article A just because they were both published by the same site. The article I referenced I believe was originally posted in the WSJ, and the Dispatch site cross published it for archive and paywall purposes. So try again.

You're a Qamoron conspiracy theory quack a doodle idiot.  Don't ever quote that debunked fucking bullshit you fucking idiot.  Fuck you are SOOOOO dumb.  

Look moron you fucked up there! You are obviously not here for actual debate it’s just to post anti Trump stuff. 🤷🏻‍♂️

That's all he can think about. Anti Trump lunatic.  
He linked Atlanta Black Star News earlier this week. You can only imagine how "accurate" that is.

Keep trying to say this Qamoron idiocy is 'accurate'. You stupid fucking moron.  You keep looking DUMBER by the post. Idiot.

You realize you are describing yourself right?  

No seriously, you are.

Your nonsensical idiocy is thus:  

 
SnowKing69 the purveyor of truth says 2+2=4

 
willy the dumb filth maga traitor cunt says 2+2=5

 
lost bitch the country betraying little cunt says: LOL willy the dumb filthy maga traitor cunt just bitch slapped SnowKing69

 
Do you see how FUCKING RETARDED you are?  Likely not - since you live in the alternate reality of delusional fucking stupidity you country betraying little traitorous cunt.  

 
Now SHUT THE FUCK UP. BITCH

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

Oh my god… somebody make him stop!!!

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

It hurts.

Goddam right you country betraying LYING little fucking cunt.  

 
When are you going to STOP lying on this board?  Don't worry - we know - never.  You're a fucking MORON that believes Qamoron pseudoscience quackery and gibberish.  Dumb cunt.

The overwhelming vast majority of all carbon on this earth is within the earth’s mantle. Only 1/5th of 1% of all carbon on earth is on earth’s surface.  

 
http://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/736161

 
We know when volcanoes erupt they emit CO2 and lots of it. And we know that throughout earth’s history volcanic activity has varied greatly. Sometimes it’s been so high to cause mass extinctions, but not from the CO2, but from things like volcanic ash blocking out the sun for some time.  

 
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_volcanism_on_Earth

 
And yet we today have just a tiny amount of CO2 in our atmosphere. 420ppm. Volcanic activity would have made CO2 skyrocket regularly throughout earth’s history.  

 
If CO2 really worked as the earth’s thermostat, then we would have had vastly more mass extinctions. So many that you and I would not be here today.  

 
The fact is that CO2 is *NOT* the earth’s thermostat. For most of the history of life on earth, CO2 has been around 3,000ppm. Sometimes lower, often much, much higher. If life on this earth can survive that, then CO2 going from 420ppm to 450ppm is NOT going to cause an ecological DOOMSDAY event.

Fucking MORON

END OF MESSAGE

There's been 90 mass shooting since trump 2.0 began including today's mass shooting at FSU. Willy why do you lie about everything?

Another crazy anti Trump lefty lunatic.....

How odd. Could it be the media doesn’t bother covering it when it’s not a propaganda push by Dems to ban guns? If GOP President can veto gun bans, then for some strange reason the media stops reporting on mass shootings. Weird, huh?

Well, maybe you aren't Icky's alter ego...  

There's should have been "There have"

Shooting should have been "shootings" plural

trump should be capitalized "Trump" he is your president, you know

you forgot a , before including and after Willy.  

Nice job looser lefty

Oh and why isn't the left wing screaming at the top of their lungs over all these "MASS" shootings?

filthy maga traitor cunts can't handle the truth jazzman - it's pathetic and sad. but true.

Are when the lefties shoot their mouths off  

 
There are hundreds if not thousands of incidences per day.  

So much for 'No more mass shootings' - you fucking MORON

 
Further - looks like this was a DEI filthy maga traitor cunt

 
FSU shooting suspect ID'd as deputy's son; gunman killed 2, injured 6: Updates

 
TALLAHASSEE, FL − Police say the son of a local sheriff deputy opened fire at Florida State University on April 17, killing two people and injuring six others in the latest school shooting to rock a U.S. college campus.

 
The alleged gunman, identified as 20-year-old Phoenix Ikner, started firing near the student union at approximately 11:50 a.m., striking multiple people and triggering a campus-wide lockdown as students ran for cover, law enforcement officials said at a news conference.

As horrific as mass shootings are I guess you haven't considered that the real media has plenty of other atrocities to report on.... like the chaos, confusion, cruelty, stupidity, unconstitutional actions, autocracy, revenge, etc of the trump administration.

spot on Jazzman - and there was a mass shooting this morning in FL by a filthy maga traitor cunt - so willy the dumb cunt's false claim that they disappeared is just more nonsensical magamoronic stupidity and lies.

I didn't realize that you're providing grammar and punctuation services now. Good to know. Also good to know that you remember something from your GED education.

I think it's obvious who the real lunatic is here. I simply stated a fact. You offered an unhinged, superfluous opinion.

I thought you Dems were supposed to be the “tolerant ones”. Yet DEI insults and graphically homophobic insults so easily roll off your tongue. How do you square that hole? Could it be attributed to your TDS induced rage.

You fucking retarded little dumb DEI bitch. Shut the fuck up already.

END OF MESSAGE

You dumb bitch.  You're inept. Incompetent. Dumb as fuck. And Retarded.  Which is what you 'think' DEI is (but it's not).

 
DUMB BITCH

You do realize that using DEI as a slur gives it agency at a slur, don’t you? How would you rationalize your approach talking with an HR rep responsible for DEI at your place of employment? How would you rationalize your use of graphically homophobic insults to an LGBTQ employee?

DEI and homos don't exist for you filthy maga traitor cunts.  Or didn't you get willy the dumb cunts memo?

I wasn't talking about the shooter.......

and you're the unhinged fucking idiot that jazzman referred to you stupid fucking filthy maga traitor cunt

So you think that exercising our first amendment constitutional right to free speech is worse than innocent people being injured and killed by a gunman. That's sick and fascist.

Fucking stupid, ignorant and uneducated to get the metaphor.

Or perhaps you are so fucking dishonest that you twist distort and misrepresent what I posted

 
Actually I’d say both  

The number of mass shootings is remaining fairly constant. The media reporting of mass shooting goes from hysterics when there’s a Democrat in the White House to CRICKETS when a Republican is in the White House.  

 
What other explanation could there be for this other than what I proposed?

Your words speak for themselves. Your hate, cruelty, and fascism are on full display.

What I posted earlier. Sadly mass shootings reportings are taking a backseat to the chaos, cruelty, authoritarianism,  and unconstitutional actions of trump and his administration.

Mass shootings went completely off the media’s radar with the last Trump administration. During Democrat administrations the reporting on mass shootings would decline when Republicans would win control over the House or Senate.

is like getting advice from The SPOAT on boosting your IQ.