Hello everyone! Who all is on Bluesky? If you've signed up for Bluesky, do you use it instead of Twitter or do you still continue to engage on Twitter?
I know lots of companions have made Bluesky accounts or started being more active on there over the last few months. Companions, what do you like about Bluesky compared to Twitter?
Clients, do you imagine yourself making use of Bluesky regularly?
I don’t need another platform to follow.
Because they hated that conservatives were not sensored on X any longer?
I'll stick with X
I’ve seen both extremes on these platforms. Not sure why a business person would try to alienate a large percentage of potential clients. I use it to weed through any potential red flags.
Twitter is now too over the edge now with its lies and the conspiracy theories
Even if you block the nut jobs, you still get the bullshit
is why I'm only on Truth Social and GETTR.
Yes- because you only get the truth on those sites.
I am not switching over, nor do I need lots of platforms to advertise. I went there & posted for over a month. I evaluated my analytics 📈 and it’s not worth it. X is a larger market compared to this new one. I paid $160 for premium on X and I will not again. I do get bookings off Twitter. I have a great personality and I hope to attract people who want to share my positive energy. I don’t like anything about bluesky & I stopped posting. I am going to cut down on websites that are not creating revenue. I know where all my bookings come from.
I really appreciate your insights Bia. From what I can gather, many companions who are using Bluesky are doing so in a way that's aspirational with the hopes that it'll be comparable to Twitter in the future regarding bookings and bringing in revenue.
...and haven't been on FakeBook in years. I jumped onto BlueSky a few months ago and have been loving it there. The best part is blocking all the magaTs there that now have no one to troll but each other, lol
I'll answer some of the questions I posed. I appreciate that on Bluesky, hashtags are back. Before Switter was shut down, hashtags for certain niches or cities (i.e. #DateNYC or #DateDC) were a reliable way for clients and companions to find each other and connect. Currently hashtags on Twitter, especially those related to sex work, are suppressed and utterly useless.
Someone else alluded to this fact.. even if I go on a blocking spree, it's much more challenging on Twitter for me to curate my experience. I'm not sure to what extent Bluesky relies on algorithms. But it feels much less.. domineering. It's a relief having a greater level of choice and control over what I see. There's the main "Following" feed. There's also "Mutuals" and "Popular With Friends." And there are even sex work specific feeds like "OurSky."
Overall I love that in many ways, on Bluesky there is more of a likelihood of cultivating genuine community like the early days of Twitter.
or most other SM and that has not changed. In general, though if I were to choose between X and Blueskies for purely personal use I would look at Blueskies as my impression (and limited direct observation without an account) is too much fake news and extreme claims (and I don't care where they come from). If I were to feel a need to do so from a more professional perspective I might have to choose X as a lot of pretty smart people are still posting on X and knowing who I need to follow would at least filter most of the ignorant and flat out propaganda posts. And like here, as long as the signal to noise level is good the noise does standout for itself so easy to ignore or laugh at.
I thought "Blue Sky" was just an ad site for Viagra!
..and assumed you were asking if we have switched our sexuality.. Still straight...
I heard about Blue Sky.. No interest in Blue Sky or Gray sky or Twitter or X. Another echo chamber silo as far as I am concerned.
I can see that. I just use it as a tool to look at different ladies.
I asked Grok (X’s AI user friendly tool) to compare the two platforms in relation to their effectiveness for high-end escorts. Interesting answer. TLDR the conclusion:
Bluesky’s biggest edge is its current lack of advertising clutter and its user-driven moderation. Unlike X, where ads pop up every few posts and compete with organic content, Bluesky remains ad-free as of February 2025, focusing on building its audience before monetizing. This means an escort’s post could stand out more without being drowned out by sponsored content or algorithmic noise. Posts on X suggest users notice fewer bots and less spam on Bluesky too, which could make it feel cleaner and more professional—potentially appealing to high-end clientele who value discretion and quality over volume. Plus, Bluesky’s customizable feeds let users (and clients) tailor what they see, so an escort could target niche audiences by aligning with specific community “starter packs” or custom algorithms, something X’s broader, less flexible feed doesn’t offer as precisely.
On the flip side, Bluesky’s smaller user base—25 million versus X’s 588 million—means a much smaller pool of potential clients. X’s scale gives escorts access to a global audience, including “hobbyists” who actively seek them out, often through hashtags or search terms that thrive in X’s chaotic ecosystem. Bluesky’s growth (e.g., 1.25 million new users in a week post-U.S. election) is impressive, but it’s still a fraction of X’s reach, limiting visibility. Engagement also seems lower on Bluesky; posts on X note it’s quieter and less optimized for the kind of viral farming that can boost an escort’s profile quickly. For high-end workers relying on word-of-mouth or a broad net to snag wealthy clients, X’s numbers and momentum still dominate.
Content policies are another factor. X allows adult content with minimal interference—nudity and suggestive posts are common, though explicit sex acts risk bans. Bluesky’s rules, while not fully stress-tested at scale, permit “adult-oriented” content but let users filter it with tags or warnings. Its decentralized moderation, including tools like Ozone (open-sourced in 2024), means communities or individuals can flag or hide posts, but there’s no central clampdown yet. This could be an advantage for escorts wanting a less policed vibe than X’s unpredictable enforcement, but it also risks inconsistency—clients might miss posts if overzealous filters kick in. X’s looser reins, by contrast, ensure content stays visible unless reported, though that comes with more bots and trolls.
Practically, X wins for now on infrastructure. High-end escorts often rely on links to personal sites or booking platforms, and X’s established ecosystem supports this seamlessly. Bluesky’s still maturing—features like analytics or premium subscriptions (mocked up in late 2024) aren’t fully rolled out, and it lacks the third-party tools (e.g., link aggregators) that sex workers lean on. Posts on X from escorts suggest they value its immediacy and client interaction, like negotiating via DMs, which Bluesky’s quieter DM system hasn’t matched yet.
Bluesky isn’t clearly more restrictive than X—both allow adult content with caveats—but it’s not a slam-dunk upgrade either. Its advantages (no ads, cleaner experience, user control) suit a boutique, discreet approach, ideal for escorts targeting discerning clients who’ve already migrated there. But X’s sheer size, engagement, and battle-tested utility keep it king for reach and hustle. For now, Bluesky’s a promising sidekick, not a replacement—think of it as a classy lounge versus X’s sprawling marketplace. Escorts might test it, but they’re unlikely to ditch X until Bluesky scales up and proves it can deliver clients, not just vibes.
The depth and detail that AI now delves into is astonishing. Scary, actually. Honestly, how far away is the advent of Skynet? lol
I was surprised how in depth it was able to get!
Naively, I really was asking about the usefulness of Bluesky for companions finding clients. I was curious if there are already a good amount of clients who primarily use Bluesky or at least include it in their process of deciding if they'll inquire with companions.
But.. it seems like some clients who hold right-wing political views refuse to use Bluesky on principle. And for the most part, the clients who are signing up for and engaging on Bluesky are on the opposite end of the political spectrum.
There’s nothing in this thread that really warranted moving it to P&R. I read it as a marketing question/topic.
was expose his lame little game that he's too lacking in creativity to rise above.
Weakling.
..and a few hundred thousand crash reports, I'm wondering how many more sex workers will flock to Bluesky.
Business wise, it makes the best sense for them to promote on both platforms.