I asked Grok (X’s AI user friendly tool) to compare the two platforms in relation to their effectiveness for high-end escorts. Interesting answer. TLDR the conclusion:
Bluesky isn’t clearly more restrictive than X—both allow adult content with caveats—but it’s not a slam-dunk upgrade either. Its advantages (no ads, cleaner experience, user control) suit a boutique, discreet approach, ideal for escorts targeting discerning clients who’ve already migrated there. But X’s sheer size, engagement, and battle-tested utility keep it king for reach and hustle. For now, Bluesky’s a promising sidekick, not a replacement—think of it as a classy lounge versus X’s sprawling marketplace. Escorts might test it, but they’re unlikely to ditch X until Bluesky scales up and proves it can deliver clients, not just vibes.
High-end escorts and prostitutes have indeed used X as a key platform for advertising and networking, drawn by its large user base, lax content moderation, and ability to reach clients discreetly yet broadly. With X’s user count hovering around 588 million (as of late 2024 estimates) and its permissive approach to adult content—despite occasional crackdowns—it’s been a go-to for sex workers to post ads, share links, or engage with followers. Bluesky, a newer decentralized platform with over 25 million users as of December 2024, is gaining attention as an alternative, especially as some X users grow frustrated with its direction under Elon Musk. So, how do they stack up for advertising in this niche, and does Bluesky offer advantages or tighter restrictions?
Bluesky’s biggest edge is its current lack of advertising clutter and its user-driven moderation. Unlike X, where ads pop up every few posts and compete with organic content, Bluesky remains ad-free as of February 2025, focusing on building its audience before monetizing. This means an escort’s post could stand out more without being drowned out by sponsored content or algorithmic noise. Posts on X suggest users notice fewer bots and less spam on Bluesky too, which could make it feel cleaner and more professional—potentially appealing to high-end clientele who value discretion and quality over volume. Plus, Bluesky’s customizable feeds let users (and clients) tailor what they see, so an escort could target niche audiences by aligning with specific community “starter packs” or custom algorithms, something X’s broader, less flexible feed doesn’t offer as precisely.
On the flip side, Bluesky’s smaller user base—25 million versus X’s 588 million—means a much smaller pool of potential clients. X’s scale gives escorts access to a global audience, including “hobbyists” who actively seek them out, often through hashtags or search terms that thrive in X’s chaotic ecosystem. Bluesky’s growth (e.g., 1.25 million new users in a week post-U.S. election) is impressive, but it’s still a fraction of X’s reach, limiting visibility. Engagement also seems lower on Bluesky; posts on X note it’s quieter and less optimized for the kind of viral farming that can boost an escort’s profile quickly. For high-end workers relying on word-of-mouth or a broad net to snag wealthy clients, X’s numbers and momentum still dominate.
Content policies are another factor. X allows adult content with minimal interference—nudity and suggestive posts are common, though explicit sex acts risk bans. Bluesky’s rules, while not fully stress-tested at scale, permit “adult-oriented” content but let users filter it with tags or warnings. Its decentralized moderation, including tools like Ozone (open-sourced in 2024), means communities or individuals can flag or hide posts, but there’s no central clampdown yet. This could be an advantage for escorts wanting a less policed vibe than X’s unpredictable enforcement, but it also risks inconsistency—clients might miss posts if overzealous filters kick in. X’s looser reins, by contrast, ensure content stays visible unless reported, though that comes with more bots and trolls.
Practically, X wins for now on infrastructure. High-end escorts often rely on links to personal sites or booking platforms, and X’s established ecosystem supports this seamlessly. Bluesky’s still maturing—features like analytics or premium subscriptions (mocked up in late 2024) aren’t fully rolled out, and it lacks the third-party tools (e.g., link aggregators) that sex workers lean on. Posts on X from escorts suggest they value its immediacy and client interaction, like negotiating via DMs, which Bluesky’s quieter DM system hasn’t matched yet.
Bluesky isn’t clearly more restrictive than X—both allow adult content with caveats—but it’s not a slam-dunk upgrade either. Its advantages (no ads, cleaner experience, user control) suit a boutique, discreet approach, ideal for escorts targeting discerning clients who’ve already migrated there. But X’s sheer size, engagement, and battle-tested utility keep it king for reach and hustle. For now, Bluesky’s a promising sidekick, not a replacement—think of it as a classy lounge versus X’s sprawling marketplace. Escorts might test it, but they’re unlikely to ditch X until Bluesky scales up and proves it can deliver clients, not just vibes.
