So a few months ago someone started a thread on the Porn Star board asking for names of porn stars that supported MAGA.  I googled it and there was a Google doc that someone made with all the names and twitter pages and exact times they showed support.  Well that thread is gone.  I rather liked it as it gave me a reference, I still remember some of the names as they were chicks that I would see, but not after seeing that.  My question is: 1) Why did TER take the thread down? 2) If they were pressured to take it down, why do those that support MAGA not want there names put out there?  I mean if they believe so much in their dictator in chief, then why not be bold and brave enough to stand by that support?  

Why should it matter?

 
Sorry but....If seeing someone based on their politics for a hour or a few...... for brief companionship or sex.... then something is wrong with you.    

 
If you bring up politics during your time..... something is wrong with you.   There is 1M other topics you can bring up.  Politics shouldn't be one....same goes for religion.

Yeah, I'll go ahead and call bullshit on that.  Stop trying to deflect and put it off as "something is wrong with you."  The point of the post wasn't talking politics during a session, it was why are porn stars and escorts that so proudly want to show their affiliation to the orange Hitler in public, privately petitioning for posts or docs to be taken down?
.
Why should it matter?  Same reason some providers choose to not see black men or some mongers choose not to see black providers.  It's a personal choice.  We all know MAGA is racist and I personally would not spend a dime with someone who supports Trump, let alone someone that holds the same believes as a like Charlie Kirk or any other neo-Nazi.  

That’s what I think happened.  Similar to us not being able to post links to news stories that name mongers or providers that have been arrested.

The second part of the question was related to why  they, “they” being MAGA, wanted it taken down. First off, it only takes one person to flag an offensive post and take it down.  But somebody must have wanted it down, and I’m sure it’s not because the person was ashamed of being racist. It was probably reported by a concerned monger who didn’t want to see those women’s income streams hurt because some people are butt hurt about losing an election.

Because MAGA likes to do shit in the dark, unless there's a crowd they can hide behind or disguise themselves within.  I'm sure it did hurt income streams, but why would it?  Maybe because the majority of the porn star/escort seeking population doesn't want to be associated with or patronize.  You call it butt hurt, another deflection, especially considering how MAGA is still crying about losing in 2020.  
.
It wasn't simply a post, it was an entire Google doc that could be used as reference, same as TER to weed out people that non-MAGA consumers wouldn't want to be associated with or spend money with.  And I highly doubt a Google doc would be taken down due to one person flagging it.  After all, there were as many or more people saying they would support those porn stars/escorts as people who said they would not.  Maybe that was just projection.  

Pretty simple.

 
Political affiliation isn't the same as RACE.... that is written in LAW.    Race could be for many many many different reasons and is the PROVIDERS CHOICE.... not clients.   You are talking about CLIENTS CHOICE.    If the provider states they dont want to see someone because of political affiliation......fine.   But you are stating this as client issue when the provider isn't saying they have an issue with it.    So again.... it is YOU or the CLIENT bring up politics during the session.

 
So again.... fucking simple..... don't bring up politics during your session.    If the provider states they dont want to see certain people on their profile......be it politics, race, etc.... THEN IT IS THEIR CHOICE.    If a client doesn't want to see that professional because of certain criteria it is on the client to dig up that info or find it prior..... not bring it up during a session.    If you don't bring it up during a session you will never know.     Just like you don't know if the grocery store owner votes a certain way, bank owner, car wash owner, gas station owner, city council, apartment owner, etc.   GET IT.  

 
Also if the topic was on the General board it should be on the political board..... it is also that fucking simple.    Again.... if people do their research on providers/pornstars..... they look up social media accounts and can see if they are voicing their opinions politically.    So why do they need it here?    If you don't look at those accounts.... well that is on you.

Google doc.... that is fucking creepy as fuck..... very stalker.    Sounds like a "hit list".  

You're actually sounding like a nazi yourself and the last word of your post is "projection", lol.

"It wasn't simply a post, it was an entire Google doc that could be used as reference, same as TER to weed out people that non-MAGA consumers wouldn't want to be associated with or spend money with"

The google "doc" you speak of probably violated X's standards as a form of doxxing.  I can see where that doesn't fit your viewpoint as you think it's quite natural to compel others to punish those that think differently.  I'm guessing you're on the side that would require a Christian artist to work on something that went against their beliefs because choosing not to because of those beliefs would be discrimination?

I'm glad I went to X and found the post.  The link is gone but the comments were worth the visit.  I didn't tally the results but it looked to be about half and half....go figure, lol.
The gals that were pushing back was priceless though!

The post was either deemed to be a TOS violation, too political for the  Porn Stars forum, or both. Why do you think the mods would “wait and see” if others complained before taking down an inappropriate thread? You stated that there were as many posters supporting the porn stars politics as criticizing them.  Are you now imagining that mods ignore violations and just delete based on popular opinion, irrespective of the violations of the terms of service?

I did not see the post or the list.  
.
- Some guys DON'T care (either for arranging a personal meeting, paying money for OF, etc.). ("Political Schmolitical! She's hot!" Who is the actress who did "Nailin' Pailin"? Was the a Dem or a Rep?)
- Some guys DO care (they *DON'T* want to $upport someone whose views and possible actions - campaign donations, protests, endorsements, having sex with candidates, ... - they disagree with).
- Some guys DO care (they *DO* want to $upport someone whose views and possible actions - campaign donations, protests, endorsements, having sex with candidates, ... - they agree with).
.
If escorts (not PS escorts), some guys might be inclined to want to meet or avoid those that they DO or DO NOT agree with, even just for fun small talk, even if just current minor / insignificant events. "Wow. Did you hear that speech? What a moron!" can apply your favorite Rep or Dem, your favorite lefty or righty, ... You might be meeting in the midst of an unavoidable local situation: "Sorry I'm so late ... (protesters) (ICE) (rally) (traffic problems due to security for a speaker) ... (followed by a + or - comment: (+) "If I wasn't here with you, I'd be there with them!" or (-) "I hate those guys." Hostess: (+) "I'm with you! Let's go there after the session!" or (-) "I'm with you. I avoid those jerks as much as possible."  
.
When meeting with hostesses from foreign countries, I do sometimes bring up "current events" about their home region. If it makes the news as a current event, it is likely to involve something political. Even natural disasters (hurricanes, earthquakes, etc.) are often tinged with politics: "So-and-so sends US Aid to region as people suffer." or "So-and-so refuses to send US Aid to region as people suffer." (Many hostesses are either ignorant of many of these events or PRETEND to be ignorant in order to avoid having to discuss them.)  
.
I didn't see the list but add that there are gradations of political leanings. Center, Center-leaning-(left or fight), and so on. If you knew that someone was a card carrying member of the Ku Klux Klan would you want to AVOID them or would you WANT to see them? If someone had Communist Party voter registration, would you want AVOID them or would you WANT to see them?