: Politics and Religion Discussion : Re: So what? Bush as el Presidente signed off on it........eom

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 386 reads

posted 12 years ago

1 / 19

"Hubris" was written by Michael Isikoff & David Corn...

...not Rachel Maddow.

Timbow 385 reads

posted 12 years ago

2 / 19

Rachel Maddow just wants to sell their book and does she include the NY Times

EOM

Posted By: Laffy

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/02/16/how-the-bush-administration-sold-the-iraq-war/

Without ANY doubt, their hero Georgie and Dick LIED to get us into war.

Flat out LIED.

They kept saying there was ZERO doubt there was WMD.

Complete and total bullshit.

There was TONS of doubt.

And they KNEW it.

But they lied their ASSES off anyway.

To me, there is NOTHING......NOTHING....worse a Prez can do than lie to get us into war.....especially of that magnitude.

And Righties do NOTHING.....NOTHING....but make excuses with, "But the Dems voted for it. Waaaaaahhh!!!."

Yeah........based on the LIES of Georgie.

Or, they'll cry, "But Clinton said they had them too."

Yeah....based on OLD intel.

They did not see the new intel that Bush and Dick did.

Righties make excuses for Bush doing THE worst thing a Prez can do yet BITCH NON-STOP how Obama is "the worst" Prez ever.

(rollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllleyes)

Zero credibility.

Z-E-R-O

-- Modified on 2/18/2013 9:12:22 AM

Timbow 379 reads

posted 12 years ago

3 / 19

Still, do they blame the NY Times any for the Iraq War ? EOM

Posted By: BigPapasan

...not Rachel Maddow.

-- Modified on 2/18/2013 9:17:16 AM

no_email 3 Reviews 368 reads

posted 12 years ago

4 / 19

You should pay greater attention to the present than the past.

If you want to talk about the past, then you should ask why the Senate Democrats, did not block Bush from becoming President, and demand a re-vote?

salonpas 385 reads

posted 12 years ago

5 / 19

Re: That lying Dickhead/SOB named Cheney has a special place in HELL......

.........waiting for him. He is directly responsible for the 5000+ American's Killed, 10,000's American's injured plus 100,000's Iraq civilians killed over a war waged under false pretenses.

Posted By: Timbow

Posted By: Laffy

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/02/16/how-the-bush-administration-sold-the-iraq-war/

Without ANY doubt, their hero Georgie and Dick LIED to get us into war.

Flat out LIED.

They kept saying there was ZERO doubt there was WMD.

Complete and total bullshit.

There was TONS of doubt.

And they KNEW it.

But they lied their ASSES off anyway.

To me, there is NOTHING......NOTHING....worse a Prez can do than lie to get us into war.....especially of that magnitude.

And Righties do NOTHING.....NOTHING....but make excuses with, "But the Dems voted for it. Waaaaaahhh!!!."

Yeah........based on the LIES of Georgie.

Or, they'll cry, "But Clinton said they had them too."

Yeah....based on OLD intel.

They did not see the new intel that Bush and Dick did.

Righties make excuses for Bush doing THE worst thing a Prez can do yet BITCH NON-STOP how Obama is "the worst" Prez ever.

(rollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllleyes)

Zero credibility.

Z-E-R-O

-- Modified on 2/18/2013 9:12:22 AM

no_email 3 Reviews 357 reads

posted 12 years ago

6 / 19

Do you buy gasoline produced from Shiite crude?

...if yes, that makes you an enabler.

Who knows, maybe you and Dick will end up being roomies.

http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/take/us-will-not-surpass-saudi-arabias-oil-production-by-2020/268

voyager-43 11 Reviews 386 reads

posted 12 years ago

7 / 19

Wow really?

You are still pissed about Bush and WMDs? Do yourself a favor and move on.

bluepillman 421 reads

posted 12 years ago

8 / 19

Ummm...you do realize the CIA director under Bush was appointed by Clinton, right?

And that he said it was a slam dunk that WMD were there with the current intel of the day? Ooops...there goes your theory to shit.

salonpas 354 reads

posted 12 years ago

9 / 19

Re: So what? Bush as el Presidente signed off on it........eom

Last time I checked the CIA director reports to the President and not the other way around.

Posted By: bluepillman

And that he said it was a slam dunk that WMD were there with the current intel of the day? Ooops...there goes your theory to shit.

ed2000 31 Reviews 400 reads

posted 12 years ago

10 / 19

It seems Laffy, Isikoff & Maddow all share what Winston Churchill rightly defined as fanaticism.

"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject."

----Sir Winston Churchill

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 460 reads

posted 12 years ago

11 / 19

Why did you modify your first post? You originally...

...said Rachel Maddow wanted to sell HER book. Go back and modify it again to read "do they include the NY Times" rather than "does she include the NY Times." Moron!

-- Modified on 2/18/2013 7:52:01 PM

Snowman39 380 reads

posted 12 years ago

12 / 19

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ - BORING...

Google is celebrating Copernicus' 150th birthday, want to talk about that ancient history as well.

Or how about FDR knowing Pearl Harbor was going to be attacked...

God you are boring!!!!

You how you can tell when someone who backs the current POTUS but knows they suck is posting.

They still like to talk about shot from 10 years ago...

BORING!!!!!

ed2000 31 Reviews 365 reads

posted 12 years ago

13 / 19

For sure. What a combination. Fanatical AND boring. (eom)

END OF MESSAGE

no_email 3 Reviews 366 reads

posted 12 years ago

14 / 19

What did you do to prevent America's war against Iraq?

END OF MESSAGE

no_email 3 Reviews 327 reads

posted 12 years ago

15 / 19

Re: Huh?

"Georgie" wouldn't have been "doing" anything if he wasn't elected.

Posted By: Laffy

Dude, there wasn't ANYTHING that was going to prevent your Messiah Georgie from doing that war.

Do you think you'll burn in hell if you rip him?

Timbow 415 reads

posted 12 years ago

16 / 19

No it is correct as stands since Maddow has a special series about it. EOM

Posted By: BigPapasan

...said Rachel Maddow wanted to sell HER book. Go back and modify it again to read "do they include the NY Times" rather than "does she include the NY Times." Moron!

-- Modified on 2/18/2013 7:52:01 PM

-- Modified on 2/19/2013 5:45:59 AM

no_email 3 Reviews 289 reads

posted 12 years ago

17 / 19

I don't like him...

and since you like to live in the past. Why didn't your boyfriend Al challenge Bush's victory? He had the most to gain from Bush's victory being overturned.

The painful tableau was captured in Michael Moore’ “Fahrenheit 9/11” with then-Vice President Al Gore presiding over a joint congressional session and repeatedly ruling African-American representatives out of order due to the absence of a senator’s signature. Out of apparent desire not to further divide the country, Gore and the Democratic senators accepted Bush’s dubious election.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2005/010405.html

That would have been the best time to devide the country, because there was an assault weapons ban at the time. The outcome would not have been as deadly.

Posted By: Laffy

Do you have a poster of him above your bed?

ed2000 31 Reviews 362 reads

posted 12 years ago

18 / 19

We all know you're an ideologue and can't change your mind. Here's proof you're a fanatic. . .

It's your decision to NOT change the subject that makes you a fanatic.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/searchMessagesResults.asp?FromPost=1&MessageID=&BoardID=39&SortBy=DateCreated+desc&Search=lied+to+get+us+into+war&SearchType=1&Author=Laffy&DayFrom=3000&DayTo=0&submit.x=59&submit.y=12

42 times?