Politics and Religion

Re: regardless of the source... ... ...
xdog 2 Reviews 1530 reads
posted
1 / 7

whether you are rebublican or democrat, rich or poor, the problems in our country all have one common factor and until we address that factor, none of the problems from abortion to gun control to immigration will ever be resolved.



ABC-TV: FINALLY SOMEONE
ASKED "HIM" THE QUESTION
Charlie
Kimbro



Congress and President
not going to be under the new Health Care
Laws.....They have their own system....of
course!!


FINALLY SOMEONE ASKED
HIM THE QUESTION!
ON "ABC-TV" DURING THE
"NETWORK SPECIAL ON
HEALTH
CARE".... OBAMA WAS
ASKED:

"MR. PRESIDENT WILL
YOU AND YOUR FAMILY GIVE UP YOUR CURRENT HEALTH
CARE PROGRAM AND JOIN THE NEW 'UNIVERSAL HEALTH
CARE PROGRAM' THAT THE REST OF US WILL BE
ON?"



THERE WAS A STONEY
SILENCE AS OBAMA
IGNORED THE QUESTION AND CHOSE NOT TO ANSWER
IT!
IN ADDITION, A NUMBER
OF SENATORS WERE ASKED THE SAME QUESTION AND
THEIR RESPONSE WAS. "WE WILL THINK ABOUT IT."
AND THEY DID. IT WAS ANNOUNCED TODAY ON THE NEWS
THAT THE "KENNEDY HEALTH CARE BILL" WAS WRITTEN
INTO THE NEW HEALTH CARE REFORM INITIATIVE
ENSURING THATCONGRESS WILL BE 100% EXEMPT
!
SO, THIS GREAT NEW
HEALTH CARE PLAN THAT IS GOOD FOR YOU AND I...
IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR OBAMA, HIS FAMILY OR
CONGRESS...??
WE (THE AMERICAN
PUBLIC) NEED TO STOP THIS PROPOSED DEBACLE ASAP!
THIS IS TOTALLY WRONG! PERSONALLY, I CAN ONLY
ACCEPT A UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE OVERHAUL THAT
EXTENDS TO EVERYONE...
NOT JUST US LOWLY CITIZENS.... WHILE THE
WASHINGTON "ELITE" KEEP RIGHT ON WITH THEIR
GOLD-PLATED HEALTH CARE
COVERAGE'S.
If you don't pass this
around, may you enjoy his
Plan!
WHAT? The Republic has
a CONSTITUTION?

Amendment
28
Congress shall make no law
that applies to the citizens of the United
States that does not apply equally to the
Senators or Representatives, and Congress shall
make no law that applies to the Senators or
Representatives that does not apply equally to
the citizens of the United States
..
Imagine what we could
do if everybody passed this
around.






BigPapasan 3 Reviews 201 reads
posted
2 / 7

...old and tried to make it look like an original post.  Go back to the minor leagues, loser.

xdog 2 Reviews 230 reads
posted
3 / 7

of what Snope claims , the point is and it is still relevant is that Congress passes laws that do not apply to them.

Perhaps you should comment on that rather than attacking someone you do not know

613spades 5 Reviews 276 reads
posted
4 / 7

I thought they had passed a law against congressional members insider trading last year.
    I do think that many politicians view us as plebs, needing their protection and total guidance. I've heard more than a few arguements that technicrats should be voting, you and I not being educated enough to understand the reasoning behind the laws they are passing. My wife has a PHD in political science and she agrees with this in principal and has mentioned that its one reason why the electorial college is still being used. I'm not argueing the validity of this, simply stating that its a theory being passed around, and supported privately if not publicly.
     The thought that our politicians need a better health care and retirement system than we do is against every thing a democracy should be. I think you'll see more petitions to have a popular vote on these items, including term limits for congressional members in the next 5 years.
     

Posted By: meinarsche

...  ...   ...regardless of whether or not this exchange actually happened, and regardless of whether or not you ''properly attributed'' the source of your post, the facts remain that the president and the bought and paid-for knuckleheads who sit on their asses in both chambers of Congress are all selling us down the river and are becoming fabulously wealthy while we get stuck by the shitty end of their stick.

Your post only covers the aspects of this phenomenon arising out of the recent passage of Obamacare which we recently had shoved down our collective gullet with about the same degree of violence as a flick you could watch on a website with a name like "Throat-Abuse.com!''  This bill was passed only because of a massive program of deceptive public relations leading-up to the vote in conjunction with a well-funded program of bribing of legislators and overly generous doling-out of pork-barrel benefits.

Of course, it doesn't apply to them. Hell no! Do you really have to ask?  No one is that naive.

The Federal government has essentially declared themselves to be members of royalty, with most of the privileges usually enjoyed by the inbred, horse-faced nitwits found in all ''royal'' families.  This is neither the first nor the only example of this self-aggrandisement  perpetrated by them, at our expense. For example, all of the gun-control bills now making their way through congress will impose draconian penalties for any violation of the law upon us should we commit them while at the same time, members of congress and the executive branch are exempt from the penalty phase of those laws.

Insider trading is highly illegal.  Martha Steward spent time in chokey for it.  Nancy Pelosi's net worth has increased by a factor of 62% between 2009 to 2010.  She's still the Speaker of the House with no jail time pending in her future.  It's neither called''insider trading,'' nor is it illegal when she does it.  She's American royalty.

The Constitution that already addresses this problem.  Check out Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8, sometime. Our government had been taken over and is now occupied on every level by an out-of-control criminal gang.  It is one of America's greatest problems.  There is a word that pointedly describes the situation when members of an elite, oligarchical class pass laws under from they are exempt.

It's known as a ''Dictatorship.''

marikod 1 Reviews 197 reads
posted
5 / 7

prediction. Turns out California has an anti-SLAP statue that allows for the award of attorney fees and a special motion to strike where:

A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim.

      What do you think? Did Scott Balber of the blue-est of blue chip law firms miss this? Or can he do an end run around the statute by couching the claim as one of breach of contract?

Look for a special motion to strike in this case.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 182 reads
posted
6 / 7

...You haven't got a clue what an anti-SLAP(sic) statue(sic) is.

And just why do you idolize Scott Balber?  Does he give you a reach-around while he's fucking you in  the ass?  Does his cum taste sweet because he drinks pineapple juice before you suck him off?

"Blue-est of the blue chip law firms."  ROFLMAO - so fucking what?  You think he's a god?  I've bitch-slapped both O'Melveny and Gibson Dunn.  It's more proof that you're not a lawyer - you think Scott Balber is great just because he's in a big firm.

-- Modified on 2/18/2013 5:50:56 PM

Snowman39 230 reads
posted
7 / 7

However, while he may have copied it, I can not seem to find the fact where the post is factually incorrect.

Is Obama on the same health care plan he says is so great for everyone else?

Register Now!