So my take on this whole exchange.  (i never looked into this whole thing and want to be brought up to speed)

Only thing that is being refuted is that Taylor wasn't a "known drug mule".... correct?

The rest of what is being said is true???

The police had a warrant for a drug dealer, police announced prior to entering, drug dealer open fired, police returned fire, people died during the exchange?

Are those the facts?

Then now sentencing under one DOJ was 31 to 44 months and another (NEW DOJ) wants 1 day?

Are those the facts?

Now Even if these facts are 100% true or even if some are true and some are not.

Here is my take on what happened for about 2-3 years.  Our justice system was out of whack.  After the Floyd/BLM riots.  Many courts, political leaders, etc. all went too overboard on things.  I am not saying people didn't do wrong.  But they went overboard to "appease" a demographic in fear of more riots and chaos (I'm not being racist I am talking about the protesters who were going nuts).   Just like they did with the whole "hands up don't shoot" fucking fiasco and lie.   Remember that with Mr. Brown.  How he as just a little innocent boy.  Yet when all the facts played out.  That was far from the truth.   Again.... I am not saying that these police might have not done everything by the books or could have done things differently.   But should the punishment be the full 31-44 months.... or should it be less?  Should it be the 1 day or should it be something in between?

Because if the facts that were presented are in fact TRUE (which none of you have refuted yet).... it looks like the 31-44 months is harsh for police doing their job.  Now an officer firing blindly into a home, thru a wall, not knowing your target, could hit other police officers, etc..... not protocol.  

Now don't go off on saying... WELL IT IS YOUR JOB TO PROVE.... no it is yours in a debate to prove him wrong as well.