Politics and Religion

Re: It was less than 300 votes.
willywonka4u 22 Reviews 2958 reads
posted
1 / 14

It was a close one, but just weeks ago Wisconsin incumbant Supreme Court judge David Prosser, and an ally of the Walker administration, was considered a shoe in. Today, it appears that Justice Prosser will soon be out of a job. JoAnne Kloppenburg has beaten David Prosser in Tuesday's election, which will shift the balance of power from a 4-3 conservative majority to a 4-3 liberal majority.

...gee, I wonder if there's any bills the Wisconsin Assembly has passed lately that the court is going to take a look-see at?

inicky46 61 Reviews 3070 reads
posted
3 / 14

Hmmmm.  "Willing to bet" there was voter fraud and "won't speculate by who."  Why so vague?
PS:  I always love America.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 1944 reads
posted
4 / 14

Gov. Walker tried to downplay this election by saying that Milwaukee is in a dark blue part of the state. Funny thing, the previous guy who held this job was....Scott Walker. And Abele won this election with more than 60% of the vote.

inicky46 61 Reviews 1266 reads
posted
5 / 14

Klooppenberg did "win," but only by less than 300 votes out of more than 1 million.  In other words, there will be a recount, and with such a slim plurality, a reversal is certainly possible.  Remember when Al Francken won?  It wasn't even this thin and it took months before he was seated.

Makwa 18 Reviews 2609 reads
posted
6 / 14

But it was against an incumbent and should have been an easy win for the GOP backed incumbent judge.
The fact that he lost is a significant rebuke of Governor Walker and the GOP policies!

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 1572 reads
posted
7 / 14
crystalforfun See my TER Reviews 1538 reads
posted
8 / 14

Its called voter fraud and I will be willing to bet there was some of this in Wisconsin.  I wont speculate by who.  But rest assured there will be a recount and if there was fraud it will be unconvered.  Sometimes I love America

inicky46 61 Reviews 899 reads
posted
9 / 14

I said it was less than 300 votes, and, yes, I agree it should have been an easy win for the incumbent.  I'm glad it happened and hope the Dem wins.  I was just saying that Willy declaring victory is waaaay premature.

crystalforfun See my TER Reviews 1352 reads
posted
10 / 14

Just read the news.  I am not even talking about Fox.  Why don't you sign on aol the most liberal internet provider out there and search fraud and Wisconsin and Supreme court race.  I don't think it really matters if she wins now as she wont be seated when it goes to the supreme court.  I believe time is on the Republicans side on this one.  Unfortunately if the elected officials just did their job and voted instead of running out of state.  This conversation and the supreme court race would have different results.  Call me crazy, but I am a realist.

inicky46 61 Reviews 1436 reads
posted
11 / 14

Well, of course she has!  So what?  The only thing that matters is the final count.  I'll be happy to celebrate her victory when it's over.  But let's not have any "premature congratulations."

Timbow 1134 reads
posted
12 / 14

Posted By: willywonka4u
It was a close one, but just weeks ago Wisconsin incumbant Supreme Court judge David Prosser, and an ally of the Walker administration, was considered a shoe in. Today, it appears that Justice Prosser will soon be out of a job. JoAnne Kloppenburg has beaten David Prosser in Tuesday's election, which will shift the balance of power from a 4-3 conservative majority to a 4-3 liberal majority.

...gee, I wonder if there's any bills the Wisconsin Assembly has passed lately that the court is going to take a look-see at?  
Quote
David Prosser gained about 7,582 votes in Waukesha County, according to a summary statement from the board of canvassers.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/04/07/964538/-Wisconsin-Supreme-Court:-Local-clerk-finds-over-7,000-votes-for-Prosser

-- Modified on 4/7/2011 10:02:33 AM

Snowman39 1073 reads
posted
13 / 14
sundance08 929 reads
posted
14 / 14

The number/occurences of "voter fraud" in this country is equal to the percentage of virgins on this site. "Voter fraud" isn't the problem in this country ... PERIOD! The problem we have is "ELECTION fraud" and we can no longer trust election results. IE Votes not being counted/verified and the fact that we vote on MACHINES/computers. We're the only civilized country/democracy/republic that uses machines. Why is it we can't get a "receipt" for our vote, but we can get an ATM receipt with our bank balance 24/7 from virtually anywhere? Why is it "exit polls" were 99% accurate in this country until we switched mainly to "voting machines" roughly 12-15 years ago? See "Hacking Democracy."

Posted By: Bruschi Girl
Just read the news.  I am not even talking about Fox.  Why don't you sign on aol the most liberal internet provider out there and search fraud and Wisconsin and Supreme court race.  I don't think it really matters if she wins now as she wont be seated when it goes to the supreme court.  I believe time is on the Republicans side on this one.  Unfortunately if the elected officials just did their job and voted instead of running out of state.  This conversation and the supreme court race would have different results.  Call me crazy, but I am a realist.

Register Now!