Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks.
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCEFactual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History
Founded in 2010, Climate Change Dispatch is a human-influenced climate change denial blog managed and edited by Thomas Richard. According to their about page: “Climate Change Dispatch (CCD) is a science and environmental news site showing its visitors the facts behind the theory of global warming, which are not being told by the mainstream media and the global-warming zealots. As noted below*, we do not believe in consensus science. Beliefs belong in church, in prayers, but not in the scientific method.” Read our profile on USA media and government. Funded by / Ownership
The owner and editor of Climate Change Dispatch are Thomas Richard. According to the Climate Change Dispatch about page, they are “100% owned and operated by private citizens, doing it part-time and/or for free. We do not receive any money from oil or energy companies or from ANY organization that receives money from the energy industry.” The website contains advertising and a donation link. Analysis / Bias
In review, Climate Change Dispatch is very honest in that they claim they do not support the consensus of science and deny the impact of human-made global warming (AWG). Articles contain loaded emotional language such as this: Election Slaughter For Climate Activism. This story is a republishing of James Taylor’s article written for the right biased and factually mixed American Thinker. In general, most content on this website is republished articles from other right-biased sources that question climate change. There is some original content published as well that also works to minimize concern over climate change. This source also promotes conspiracies, such as Oxford University publishing fake news. Essentially, this is a website that promotes anti-climate change propaganda. Failed Fact Checks
“Most extreme weather phenomena have not become more extreme, more deadly, or more destructive” – False
“The amount of coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at record high levels”; those claiming the reef is threatened by climate change are alarmists – Inaccurate
“Great Barrier Reef Sea Surface Temperature: No Change In 150 Years” – Inaccurate
Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 11/20/2018) Updated (02/02/2024) Source: https://climatechangedispatch.com Last Updated on February 2, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
And these are the same people who tell you the world is ending because the cows keep farting.
Trump says he'll deport them on his first day in office.
-- Modified on 1/12/2025 12:56:50 AM
…is because all the taco trucks burned up and PigBapa was getting dangerously close to eating homeless celebrities.
Just more evidence filthy maga traitor cunts have no fucking clue what you're talking about your dumb fucking IDIOT
With all the regulations in California, the one thing they couldn’t regulate is how to build houses that don’t burn up. Anyone with sense knows that in the fire, heat rises. So what’s the dumbest thing you can do? Pack a crap ton of houses going up a mountain that regularly burns? If you want it to not burn you 1) space out the houses more. 2) you place fire breaks all over the place. 3) you cut down brush and trim trees, then you DIG A FUCKING HOLE and put those branches in the hole and cover it with dirt so the decaying wood acts as a sponge for water. 4) you disconnect every home from the city sewer and have waste water processed with holding cells and plants and have it slowly drip irrigate peoples lawns.
But none of these things were done. The people who tell us cow farts will doom us all couldn’t even put out fires when they’re sitting right up next to the Pacific Ocean.
can be seen on the local LA news scooping up water from the Pacific Ocean.
This nightmare could have been so much less if they had water the first night.
Also a slight feel-good moment, a firefighter takes down a flag before it burns.
-- Modified on 1/12/2025 6:04:56 PM
Some of them might start wondering why they bother to pay their taxes if they get nothing in return.
a bad idea. Similar to private security if you are in a situation that is beyond the capabilities of regular LE.
From the Article...
"Newsom Ripped for Going on ‘Pod Save America’ While L.A. Burns
BAD PUBLICITY?"
http://www.thedailybeast.com/gavin-newsom-ripped-for-going-on-pod-save-america-while-la-burns/
Then Go to 13:15 for his narrow brush with a hair fire.
shut the power lines down when all of the water pumps throughout the city run on electricity? Duh. The more we learn about this, the more evidence becomes known that show the Democrats should not be in charge of anything. Dems believe we can control the temperature of the earth, and yet they don't know how to be prepared to put out a fire.
due to the fact that many - even these 2025 L.A. fires - have or may have been caused by downed power lines that sparked and ignited the fires. but hey - take the filthy maga traitor way out and blame anyone and everyone -- especially if they are 'liberal' or 'democrat'.
Downed power lines and high winds.
was being PREPARED to put out a fire. I understand that downed power lines can cause fires, but in typical Democrat fashion, there is no plan B for a crisis. We have to choose between risking MORE fires or being able to extinguish the fires we already have. Why isn't there a third choice that allows us to do both? Why not a system of diesel or gas-fired generators to run the pumps? Of course, the expense to put those in cannot be justified by the Dems who want to spend as much of the budget as possible fighting global warming (did you notice the pivot a few years ago from "clean air" to "global warming.") It's because with all of the wildfires the last ten years in SoCal, clean air is already a dead horse.
Ickybiden has a reading compression problem so he completely missed any key words in your post.
Not to mention his hate for anything factual and love for terrorism. These fires probably bring back memories of the "good ol days" of BLM for ickybiden.
I think a gnat is following me around.
These fires are *NOT* caused by climate change. They’re caused by Gavin Newsom.
Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks.
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Founded in 2010, Climate Change Dispatch is a human-influenced climate change denial blog managed and edited by Thomas Richard. According to their about page: “Climate Change Dispatch (CCD) is a science and environmental news site showing its visitors the facts behind the theory of global warming, which are not being told by the mainstream media and the global-warming zealots. As noted below*, we do not believe in consensus science. Beliefs belong in church, in prayers, but not in the scientific method.”
Read our profile on USA media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The owner and editor of Climate Change Dispatch are Thomas Richard. According to the Climate Change Dispatch about page, they are “100% owned and operated by private citizens, doing it part-time and/or for free. We do not receive any money from oil or energy companies or from ANY organization that receives money from the energy industry.” The website contains advertising and a donation link.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Climate Change Dispatch is very honest in that they claim they do not support the consensus of science and deny the impact of human-made global warming (AWG). Articles contain loaded emotional language such as this: Election Slaughter For Climate Activism. This story is a republishing of James Taylor’s article written for the right biased and factually mixed American Thinker.
In general, most content on this website is republished articles from other right-biased sources that question climate change. There is some original content published as well that also works to minimize concern over climate change. This source also promotes conspiracies, such as Oxford University publishing fake news. Essentially, this is a website that promotes anti-climate change propaganda.
Failed Fact Checks
“Most extreme weather phenomena have not become more extreme, more deadly, or more destructive” – False
“The amount of coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at record high levels”; those claiming the reef is threatened by climate change are alarmists – Inaccurate
“Great Barrier Reef Sea Surface Temperature: No Change In 150 Years” – Inaccurate
Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 11/20/2018) Updated (02/02/2024)
Source: https://climatechangedispatch.com
Last Updated on February 2, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
The article has many references linked, and everything said in it reflects what I’ve heard many scientists say about this topic. We now know that most of the “fact check” websites were just people acting on the orders of Biden administration bureaucrats who have zero background in science.
That's just a FACT. i.e. Filthy maga traitor cunt LIES re: J6. Filthy maga traitor CUNT LIES re: Hurricane relief. Filthy maga traitor CUNT LIES re: Biden 'crime family' (as the filthy CUNTS put a CONVICTED FELON into office). Filthy maga traitor CUNT LIES re: the LA wildfires. What we KNOW - is that filthy maga traitor CUNTS are LIARS. Can't admit to their LIES because most of you little CUNTS are weak pathetic morally bankrupt cowards that cant' MAN UP to the truth. Dumb CUNTS.
No reason........
Even though you stupid filthy dirty maga CUNTS are dumber than shit - you can still read English. You dumb cunts.
No reason........
The funny thing is, the local Grammer Nazi never steps in to correct his fuck ups. It's interesting how that happens, or in this case, it Doesn't happen...
Calling a filthy maga traitor CUNT a filthy maga traitor CUNT has nothing to do with anger - it's just simple plain truth and FACT. Dumb little cowardly weak traitor CUNT
He used it pretty much every time he posts. He found it on The Urban Dictionary and finds it adorable.
Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks.
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Founded in 2010, Climate Change Dispatch is a human-influenced climate change denial blog managed and edited by Thomas Richard. According to their about page: “Climate Change Dispatch (CCD) is a science and environmental news site showing its visitors the facts behind the theory of global warming, which are not being told by the mainstream media and the global-warming zealots. As noted below*, we do not believe in consensus science. Beliefs belong in church, in prayers, but not in the scientific method.”
Read our profile on USA media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The owner and editor of Climate Change Dispatch are Thomas Richard. According to the Climate Change Dispatch about page, they are “100% owned and operated by private citizens, doing it part-time and/or for free. We do not receive any money from oil or energy companies or from ANY organization that receives money from the energy industry.” The website contains advertising and a donation link.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Climate Change Dispatch is very honest in that they claim they do not support the consensus of science and deny the impact of human-made global warming (AWG). Articles contain loaded emotional language such as this: Election Slaughter For Climate Activism. This story is a republishing of James Taylor’s article written for the right biased and factually mixed American Thinker.
In general, most content on this website is republished articles from other right-biased sources that question climate change. There is some original content published as well that also works to minimize concern over climate change. This source also promotes conspiracies, such as Oxford University publishing fake news. Essentially, this is a website that promotes anti-climate change propaganda.
Failed Fact Checks
“Most extreme weather phenomena have not become more extreme, more deadly, or more destructive” – False
“The amount of coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at record high levels”; those claiming the reef is threatened by climate change are alarmists – Inaccurate
“Great Barrier Reef Sea Surface Temperature: No Change In 150 Years” – Inaccurate
Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 11/20/2018) Updated (02/02/2024)
Source: https://climatechangedispatch.com
Last Updated on February 2, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
