Suddenly, unless u are MAGA, we are going after you.  

Trump and his crew have long looked for any excuse to attack people for their beliefs. It's called lawfare. And there will be more of it.

Aren't you the biggest denier that lawfare even existed?  

Pretty Sure you are...

Lawfare was previously alleged by righty whiners when it didn't exist. Because Trump actually DID commit crimes. Trump longed to revenge himself on Dems by weaponizing the Justice Dept. to go after his enemies. And now he's actually DOING it. Ergo, lawfare now exists when it did not before.

They want to go after ANY group that is linked to paying people to commit violence or that promotes violence.

 
Kind like terrorist groups.    But I guess you missed that part.

 
You do know that you have the freedom to say what you want.   But the consequences are still there.   Like you have the freedom to say "I WILL KILL YOU".... but the consequences are you will get arrested if the person wants to press charges.  

 
Then if you say well that political group paid me to say that and it is proven that the political group did pay you to say that.... well Vance and other want to be able to charge and shut down that political group.   See the issue.

I guess you missed THIS part and many other similar parts:  
.
http://www.huffpost.com/entry/proud-boys-trump-political-violence_n_678f084ae4b0d1b4d170e3f3
The Proud Boys Are Back, And A New Era Of Political Violence Begins.
"Trump's pardons sent a message to his followers: ****There are no consequences for political violence, so long as it's carried out in Trump's name.****  
.
"The Proud Boys were the face of political violence in America during Trump’s first term. They hosted bloody street fights across the country week after week, and helped to normalize violence at everyday civic events. They intimidated and attacked people at libraries, school board meetings, drag queen story hours, reproductive health events and political rallies. They cozied up to Trump’s inner circle, enjoyed support from prominent Republicans and right-leaning media and secured political seats of their own. And on Jan. 6, 2021, they led an attempted insurrection at the Capitol. ..."
.
http://apnews.com/article/trumps-first-day-white-house-b9ab76e21a159e681ea5ac74231adcea
Trump defends pardons for rioters and suggests Proud Boys could have place in politics.
.
http://time.com/4203094/donald-trump-hecklers/
Donald Trump Tells Crowd to ‘Knock the Crap Out Of’ Hecklers.
"Donald Trump told supporters Monday to “knock the crap out of” would-be hecklers at a campaign rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. ...
.
"Trump said he would even pay for any legal fees that supporters incurred stopping a tomato-thrower. ..." [That was a figurative "tomato-thrower" -- there were no tomatoes -- to refer to any vocal Trump opponent]  
.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-trump-campaign-protests-20160313-story.html
Trump’s endorsement of violence reaches new level: He may pay legal fees for assault suspect.
.
"Reporting from BOCA RATON, Fla. — When Donald Trump said Sunday that he might pay the legal fees of a man charged with hitting a protester in the face at one of his rallies, it was the latest of many occasions when the leading Republican candidate for president appeared to condone or accept violence by supporters. ...
.
"Heckling at rallies is a staple of all presidential campaigns, and the New York billionaire attracts more than average. For both Democrats and Republicans, it’s routine to urge unruly crowds to remain peaceful ...
.
"But ***Trump alone has openly endorsed violent retaliation*** against people who disrupt his rallies, many of whom accuse him of racism. The racially charged mayhem that erupted at his planned rally in Chicago on Friday night, with black and Latino protesters and white Trump supporters taking swings at one another on live television, did nothing to temper what critics in both parties have labeled his dangerous rhetoric. ...
.
"Trump did not specify which incident he was referring to, but he appeared to be talking about an assault in the audience during his rally Wednesday in Fayetteville, N.C. Police were ejecting a black protester, whom ***multiple videos*** show to have been ****loud but nonviolent,**** when a 78-year-old white man, John McGraw of Linden, N.C., hit the protester in the face. McGraw, who was arrested the next day on suspicion of assault and disorderly conduct, told “Inside Edition” on his way out of the rally: *****“Next time we see him, we might have to kill him.”*****
.
"On NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, Trump was asked whether he would ***pay McGraw’s legal fees,*** as he once offered to do for supporters who rough up protesters. ***“I’ve actually instructed my people to look into it, yes,”*** Trump responded.

Funny you to to OPPOSITE articles that the OP's.... got it.  

 
So bring up things not mentioned.   each fucking article and quote is from Fed, Jan, and March..... so not even close to the time frame of what Vance is talking about in the OP's article.    So who is fucking LOST.

 
So with what Vance is talking about would make it so they can go after groups like Proud Boys and others.    

 
But I guess you miss that side of the coin as well.   So you can go after groups on the left and right if they are funded.  Which I am all for.

" ****There are no consequences for political violence, so long as it's carried out in Trump's name.**** "  
.
http://www.c-span.org/clip/campaign-2024/former-pres-trump-i-am-your-justicei-am-your-retribution/5060238
"Former President Trump tells the crowd, "I am your justice...I am your retribution." He then vows to *****"totally obliterate"***** the so-called deep state."
.
There is ZERO evidence that Trump will go after violent Trump supporters. There is plentiful evidence that Trump will use the death of Kirk to escalate his attacks on his opponents.

An article from 2023

 
YEP keep proving my point.   Nothing to do with what Vance and Trump are talking about right now.   Congratulations for showing how the left is twisting things all the time.   Thank you for proving my point.

 
Vance and Trump are talking about going after groups who promote or fund violence that happens.... it can be radical righties too.   But impposter is blind to see it.

This isn't a matter of "connecting the dots." It is a big, fat, solid bright line from Trump's past rhetoric to his present rhetoric. How about 2 and 4 days ago?
.
Friday 12-Sep-2025 on Fox and Friends (see my previous post about this):
29:26 Ainsley Earhardt: WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT OUR COUNTRY, ***WE HAVE RADICAL ON THE RIGHT*** AND LEFT, PEOPLE ARE WATCHING VIDEOS AND CHEERING, SOME PEOPLE ARE CHEERING THAT CHARLIE WAS KILLED. HOW DO WE FIX THIS COUNTRY? ***HOW DO WE COME BACK TOGETHER?***
.
Trump: I TELL YOU SOMETHING THAT IS GOING TO GET ME IN TROUBLE, ***I COULDN'T CARE LESS.*** RADICALS ON THE RIGHT ARE RADICAL BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO SEE CRIME. [Radicals on the right are radical for "GOOD" reasons.]
.
Trump: WE [MAGAs] DON'T WANT PEOPLE COMING IN, WE DON'T WANT YOU BURNING OUR SHOPPING CENTERS, SHOOTING OUR PEOPLE IN THE STREET. *****RADICALS ON THE LEFT ARE THE PROBLEM AND THEY ARE VICIOUS AND HORRIBLE AND POLITICALLY SAVVY.*****" [Radicals on the left are radical for "EVIL" reasons.]  
.
Yeah, a continuation of Trump's even-handed approach to bringing both sides together ... NOT.
.
From Sat 13-Sep, Sun 14-Sep, and Mon 15-Sep:
.
http://nypost.com/2025/09/15/us-news/jd-vance-hosts-charlie-kirk-show-stephen-miller-vows-doj-dhs-crackdown-on-left-wing-groups-promoting-violence/
NEW YORK POST 15-Sep
On ‘Charlie Kirk Show’ hosted by JD Vance, Stephen Miller vows DOJ, DHS crackdown on left-wing groups ‘promoting violence’.
.
"White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said Monday that the Trump administration is working on an ****“organized strategy to go after left-wing organizations**** that are promoting violence” in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. ...
.
"It was not immediately clear which groups would be targeted, though President Trump has expressed in the past a need to focus law enforcement efforts on left-wing groups accused of funding riots. ..."
.
http://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2025-09-15/after-charlie-kirks-death-trump-team-calls-for-dismantling-leftist-groups
After Charlie Kirk's Death, Trump Team Calls for Dismantling Leftist Groups.
"Vice President JD Vance and another top official in President Donald Trump's administration on Monday argued that serving the memory of Charlie Kirk means pursuing left-leaning groups they portray as bent on undermining national unity. ...
.
"Vance, who guest-hosted the slain conservative activist's livestream show, amplified right-wing calls for a broadside against leftist groups after Kirk was assassinated last week as he addressed college students. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, Vance's guest on the program, said Kirk's final message to him called for ***a coordinated effort against unnamed left-wing groups*** accused of promoting violence, pledging the federal government would use "every available resource" to dismantle them. ...

Wrong! If you want to READ their words (above), find the videos. They have declared that they are targeting the lefties! Righties are excused and pardoned.

IF LEGISLATION PASSES....... it goes both ways.    

 
You can say all you want from what they said......in one or two interviews.   But there are more that they talk about far extreme groups on both political sides.   But you cherry pick.

 
Also I called you out on the fucking bullshit old ass articles.

I wrote: "This isn't a matter of "connecting the dots." It is a big, fat, solid bright line from Trump's past rhetoric to his present rhetoric. How about 2 and 4 days ago?" Are those very recent articles too "old ass"? Are they "fucking bullshit"?

I meant to include the "DON'T" when I wrote, above [with the **DON'T** correction included here]:
"If you **DON'T** want to READ their words (above), find the videos. They have declared that they are targeting the lefties! Righties are excused and pardoned." I usually post links to print / written sources, and sometimes to video (youtube) sources. If you don't want to read the articles there is often an embedded video or link to a video. If not, there is usually enough detail in the headline or opening paragraph to find the youtubes with video of the interviews or speeches being quoted.  
.
If you think the quotes and articles are "fucking bullshit" post the contradictory evidence with sources.