I'm sure we all believe that there are moderate Muslins in our country and in the rest of the world who truly believe in peace and coexistence. But what I find is that there seems to be so few prominent Muslims who command large audiences. Instead we have too many radicals like the Norwegian Mullah Krekar. This is an interview he gave in 2015. Where was the worldwide condemnation from the Muslim world? If there was, I missed it. I am not a racist nor am I anti religious, but if this is the face of Islam, there is need to be concerned. Please be patient and watch the entire interview. It provides an lot of insight in my opinion.

India's Muslim population is 14.2% of the population or 172 million.     That is more than the entire population of Pakistan.     The country had two Presidents who were Muslims and countless number of Ministers at the Federal and State levels.

Why haven't all these prominent individuals gone on public record via the many faces of the media to condemn the radical mullahs? Is a large part of the world just waiting to see which way the wind will blow?

White religious conservatives have not gone on the public record condemning those who bomb planned parenthood locations, repeatedly---or the white US born terrorists who bombed the govt buildings in OK city? Or, the US born who have perpetrated school shootings, or the recent massacre of people in a black church in Charleston SC by a white, US born racists radical...or............

Yes that is right.   Mass terrorist attacks in Tucson, Aurora, Newtown, Oak Creek, Charleston, DC all perpetrated by American born white terrorists!

I would like to see what I missed. Before I posted, I researched what info I could find on the subject. Please show me where that information exists so that I might be able to correct my ignorant beliefs.

One of the fabulous advantages of the modern world is the vast amount of information available to all of us, by simply running a search engine query.  

I honestly missed it . I wish there was more publicity given to articles like this. The real point behind my op was that criticism of radical Islam by the West has much less of an import than if it comes from the leaders and high profile individuals of the Muslim world. BTW, that article does date back to 2008. A lot has happened since then.

Where was it when you eagerly adopted the photo propaganda I refuted for you earlier?

T's claim of inauguration crowd numbers (at...what...1.5 million people? THE most attended inauguration EVER!!!!!)---despite every single data point to the contrary, have been debunked/disproven over and over again---by multiple new orgs (yeah...they're all lying---it's a conspiracy).

I agree that it would be helpful to see more overt criticism of 'radical' islam from moderate Muslims.  

Trump never said it was the most attended. They said it was the largest audience, which if you add up all the online streaming views that is absolutely true. The photo the media used to demonstrate numbers was taken hours before the inauguration. It very well could have been 1.5 million in attendance; the guy in charge of organizing the inauguration admitted he told Trump as much. Still it was a far smaller crowd in person than Obama 2009, but then Trump never argued that point.  

"That was the largest audience to witness an inauguration, period. Both in person and around the globe."

Nice try to explain your out of context misinterpretation.  If you'd seen the whole thing like I did you'd know that when challenged he clarified he meant the total of in person, TV and online. Some were like you and so eager to criticize that Spicer had to start adding their own numbers for them.

You are separating the "in person" numbers from "the around the globe" numbers. Spicer was not.

Every single thing you just said, I can point out to in the Bible. Even worse things. Your Christian Crusades were nothing more than terrorism too.

There are three important differences between the Crusades and today's Moslems.

but by and large I do agree with you. There was a time when Christians and Muslims were equally abhorrent, but while the Christians have evolved over the last few centuries, the Muslims are as barbaric as ever. The scary part is that these barbarians have access to 21 century technology. Anyone not afraid of Islamic terrorism is a fool IMHO.