Write Review
1,981,352 Total Reviews 3,439 New Reviews
7,320 Users Online

Politics and Religion

Once again, The SPOAT gets it wrong and makes a fool of himself
inicky46 61 Reviews 32 reads
posted

All three flights were transcontinental. So all three planes were full of aviation fuel.
SPOAT should learn a bit more about how to google before he falls on his face again.
He really is Too Stupid To Talk To.

willywonka4u263 reads

Doesn’t it feel strange this happened so long ago now? There’s people who will be voting in this election who weren’t even alive when this happened.  

 
There were many things that bothered me about that day. Building #7 always struck me as strange. WTC#4 and #5 were right next to the twin towers, #7 was farther away. And yet despite that the towers fell on top of #4 and #5 they still had to be pulled down days later. That always bothered me.  

 
I remember watching the security camera footage of the Pentagon attack. It bothered me a lot back then but I haven’t thought about it in years. The footage is irritating because as security cameras were in those days, you just got freeze frame every second or so. But I watched it again today, and there’s two frames where you can see the object hit the Pentagon. And it just don’t look like a plane to me. It looks much much smaller.  

 
Below is an image of the Pentagon seconds before the building was attacked.

ReplyQuoteReport
willywonka4u34 reads

Of the object just before it hit the Pentagon.

ReplyQuoteReport
willywonka4u27 reads

So here is an image of the blast radius at maximum height. The Pentagon is 5 stories tall, only the top 3 have windows. Using that as a rough guide, it looks to me that the blast is about 8, maybe 10 stories high.  

 
The twin towers were 110 stories high and judging from the video footage of the 2nd plane, the blast radius is around 28 stories high. Odd.  

 
Now I admittedly know nothing about planes and flying, but striking the side of the Pentagon seems like it would be very difficult to do for an experienced pilot, much less a rookie pilot.  

 
Looking at the Pentagon from the air, why wouldn’t you aim for the center court yard? Aim the nose of the plane into an inside corner of the building. Wouldn’t that be easier to maneuver and cause more damage if that was what you intended to do?  

 
Odd.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4635 reads

And the lens in the security camera. The building is so big even a plane looks small in comparison.  
I recall seeing the mark on the North Tower after the first plane went in. It looked small because the building was so huge. Then when they panned out I realized its actual size. Then again, I don't suffer from a mental disorder.

ReplyQuoteReport
RespectfulRobert32 reads

"Now I admittedly know nothing about planes and flying..." and then he immediately goes on to make an asinine point about, what for it...planes and flying. lol.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4625 reads

He tries to make a point and admits he knows little about it.  
Unless it's Ivermectin.

ReplyQuoteReport
willywonka4u29 reads

Now suppose you’re a rookie pilot and you want to maximize how much damage you cause the Pentagon. And you definitely don’t wanna crash in the parking lot just destroying parked vehicles and maybe killing no one.  

Where do you aim the plane, Bob?

ReplyQuoteReport
willywonka4u30 reads

I pass it every day. That’s not the point. A plane flying into a building causes a blast radius. We can roughly calculate the size of that radius using the building as a guide. The 2nd WTC attack clearly made a much larger blast.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4631 reads

The answer to your question is easy. The explosions at the WTC were larger than the one at the Pentagon because THE PLANES WERE LARGER. Both WTC planes were Boeing 767s while the Pentagon plane was a 757 carrying much less fuel.
Please stop over-complicating things that have simple answers with your conspiracy-drugged excuse for a brain.

ReplyQuoteReport
willywonka4u30 reads

The 757 is only 14% smaller than a 767. The blast wasn’t 14% smaller.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4637 reads

What matters is fuel capacity. The fuel capacity of a 757 is around 11,500 gallons while the 767 carries 16,700 gallons. That's a nearly 40% difference.  
Which is a lot of boom.

ReplyQuoteReport
durran42129 reads

It's really nice that you googled fuel capacity of commercial airliners to make everyone think you seem smart. Sadly, You're the same old dumb ass that you were an hour ago.

Fuel capacity is not the same as fuel needed for a leg of a flight. Which is determined by number of booked passengers and estimated weight plus the length of the leg of flight.  

Example: let's say bigP was on board. They would only be able to fuel a very, VERY small amount. See, 1 BigP = 7 or 8 regular people.

But lets say you and all 2 of your friends were on board,  with your frail 80lb frame and 2 regular 90 year old pals, why they could fill'er up!! See how that works!

Just over here taking yo ass to school! Again!!🤣🤣
You're welcome.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4633 reads

All three flights were transcontinental. So all three planes were full of aviation fuel.
SPOAT should learn a bit more about how to google before he falls on his face again.
He really is Too Stupid To Talk To.

ReplyQuoteReport
durran42130 reads

The fuel still gets calculated retard. I guess I embarrassed you again huh. They were not "full" of aviation fuel.  
Didn't you read my example about bigP??  
You should learn to stay off Google a little bit more so you don't look like a full blown retard when you screw up an explanation pretending to be smart. You continue to embarass yourself. Even your lefty pals are embarrassed for you.  
What a sad little old man you are.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4635 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
durran42125 reads

This is your rebuttal of getting owned by me again?
You have no game.
You have humiliated yourself yet one more time.
Everyone laughs at you Mr repeat because you are just that stupid.
I accept your surrender, puppet.

Did I mention you have no game?  Oh and no life as you continue to be TERs Top poster of all time. Posting here is all you got left because we all know you damn sure ain't "feasting on hotties" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Name            Number Of Posts
1. inicky46               1645

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4629 reads

SPOAT suffers from delusions of adequacy.
SPOAT imagines he "owns" anyone.
SPOAT does not have enough game to know who continually stuffs him
SPOAT is too stupid to understand his gameless, simple-minded posts humiliate anyone but himself.
No one laughs at the SPOAT because he's become such an annoying pest.
SPOAT is also The BLOAT.  
And my personal piñata.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4623 reads

and make a fool of himself AGAIN.

ReplyQuoteReport
durran42129 reads

In his delusional mind, he thinks everyone believes his lies. So he rambles on and on........and on like above, then realized he forgot his famous yet lame "last word" post in hopes that whoever he's talking to will not reply because his ass has been whipped enough at that point. Oh TATL, we don't fall for that you idiot.

But even bigger question is, I wonder how he feels knowing I OWN his lame old ass every single day that I choose to own it. Anytime I want. Sucks to be TATL.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4631 reads

I think he's unusually upset today after watching his Lord and Master make a fool of himself the other night.
How can he not realize that when he keeps saying he "owns" me that everyone is laughing at him?
Dance, Piñata Boy! DANCE!!! I OWN YOU! (see how easy it is to say that? But in my case it's TRUE)

ReplyQuoteReport
durran42127 reads

Looks like I triggered the old man again. I'm probably causing his blood pressure to spike.
It must be embarrassing knowing I OWN you in front of everyone huh. Even your lefty pals are laughing at you.  
Although you do have  one "friend" that usually comes to the rescue. I guess you are an embarrassment to him too. Oh well!  
Jump TATL......Jump!! Good boy. 🤣🤣🤣

ReplyQuoteReport
lester_prairie29 reads

Her husband worked at the Pentagon and was in the parking lot and saw the plane hit the building.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!