No new facts, just the same old unsubstantiated bullshit. Even the newly Trump-friendly CBS agrees.

not just empty rhetoric.  He's declassifying and releasing the proof.  You will have to convince people not to believe their own lying eyes when they look at the documents and reports.  Lol

Why only yesterday, Toady Todd Blanche, under pressure from the Senate to get confirmed, reluctantly met with the Epstein survivors. They emerged saying the meeting was "not productive."
Meanwhile, where's the proof that the GA Senators fixed the election?
NADA.
Poor CDL. Twisting slowly in the wind. But predictably refuses to take the L.

ABC and NBC didn’t broadcast grandpas speech..😆
And guess who wants their license reviewed… yup..grandpa  
Where are all the “Free Speech “ warriors.
Oh… CBS of course broadcast it in it’s entirety

According to AI Overview:
"CBS broadcast most of President Trump's primetime address on Thursday night, though they notably cut away early during parts of his election fraud speech to provide real-time fact-checking and commentary."

So it’s only FOX that’s probably scratching their heads, thinking..,”We did what?”🤣

Hope this goes nowhere with Trump "investigating" or "reviewing".

 
He can look at the past and networks have not "showed" all news conferences by presidents that are deemed "non essential" type things.    They did it with Biden, Obama, Trump (first term), and I even think Bush.

Well you can't call it an "L" just yet.    Like he stated he is releasing things that might not have been made public yet.

 
Remember we have been told that there was NO cheating type stuff.    Yet now it is coming out that there was.

 
I WILL RESTATE WHAT I HAVE SAID ALL ALONG....... There is proof of cheating in elections but was it enough to over turn the presidency..... NO!!!      But it might come down to some local, state, county type things.  Which could change smaller local or state representatives.   Which we haven't seen much talked about that issue.    GA is the only one it seems.

 
But again.... until all the "evidence" he is dumping comes out and what not.    You can't say "TAKE THE L".....  but yes the new conference was a nothing burger.

He's dumping alright. A big steaming dump of bullshit. I think all he proved was that Russia interfered in our elections to help trump.

More like a proof of dementia speech.

Yet this is what he has recently said about Xi:

 
April 16 - "I have a great relationship as you know with President Xi."
May 2 - "President Xi - good man, good man."
May 5 - "I have a very good relationship with President Xi.  I find him to be a tremendous guy and we get along well."
May 7 - "I have a very good relationship with President Xi."
May 10 - "President Xi is a good man, smart man."
May 11 - "I have a great relationship with President Xi."
May 12 - "My relationship with President Xi is a fantastic one."
May 14 - "I wanna thank President Xi, my friend."
May 15 - "President Xi's an incredible guy."
May 15 - "I have a very good relationship with President Xi and with China."
May 27 - "We had an amazing meeting with President XI."
June 17 - "President Xi was fantastic."
June 18 - "You know who's very smart is President Xi of China.  He's a very smart man."
July 8 - "President Xi has been great."
July 8 - "Big fan of President XI."

the declassified documents and see for themselves what was going on with election security, but I started reading them today and its pretty compelling stuff to make the case for the "Save America" act.  81% of Democrats already believe there should be voter ID and proof of citizenship.  The sticking point seems to be mail-in ballot.  If the Trump team would come up with a failsafe plan to ensure the integrity of mail-in ballots, I think it would get through the Senate.  

 
There are a lot of people who like the convenience of mail-in ballots, including me, but I'm willing to go vote in person in the future if it will end the widespread fraud and corruption shown in some of the declassified documents I have looked at so far.   Once you sign up a dead person for a mail-in ballot, they will get one every year without question.  That's an untenable situation.  

"We heard the President make claims that electronic voting machines are vulnerable and easily compromised.  FOX News has not seen that evidence yet and is not in a position to evaluate the accuracy of the President's claims and statements at this time."
Sean Hannity and Bret Baeir also read the disclaimer.

 
IOW, even FOX News isn't carrying Trump's water anymore, unlike TER righties who still suck Trump's cock.

 
The next morning, Fox & Friends completely ignored Trump’s speech; they didn't mention it once in their 3 hour show.

until they have a chance to read the declassified documents from the CIA about China's meddling in our election of 2020.  The standard for slander is saying something is true when you don't know for sure.  Presumably, very few people have read the entire cache of documents by now and nobody had time to do it BEFORE the speech because the link went live WHILE Trump was speaking.   I spent 3 hours today and only got through about 5% of the total.  Just judging from the file sizes, it has to be thousands of pages, so it will take awhile.  I listened to several radio talk shows while driving today and everyone said it will take weeks to read and digest what's in the documents even for those that do this stuff for a living.  

 
Saying they cannot verify them yet is not the same as saying we don't believe what he said.  There are merely reserving their right to either support or repudiate at a future date.  How many drug commercials do you see without a disclaimer.  ANSWER:   Zero, that's why this is a nothing-burger that the Dems are trying to deflect with.  Aa loyal choirboy, you keep singing, because you have nothing else to talk about that is favorable to the Dems.

http://www.youtube.com/shorts/q42DLmDT_YM