oh the irony. Sec. of State Hilary Clinton talks about the horrors of governments in the Middle East beating up protesters, while her security beats the shit out of a silent protester right in front of her.

Oh wait, GWB is gone. The freedom loving, open minded Dems are in charge now. lmao

No one got beat up during the Watergate break in.

Looking like a lesbian nun (OK, that might be redundant), or a 60s flashback to the UC Berkeley days ain't going to increase viewership. I'm guessing the show is on a very tight budget. Would you Progressives please donate a little more money so Amy can afford a frigging hair and makeup stylist.

Damn, I wanted to watch, but this was opposite a rerun of 'The Jefferson's'.



-- Modified on 2/21/2011 9:01:48 AM

Clintons revenge is deadly, with no sorrow,

http://www.pacinst.com/terrorists/chapter9/waco.html


http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/04/a-kent-state-legacy/

He makes Chavez and Castro look moderate in comparison.

I would wager that your words may be the kindest ever uttered in re to our newest board troll.

Fucking pussy!!! lol

despite MVG's claims to the contrary.

.....what say all of you while on your knees acknowledging the annoited one's spokesperson,, the awesome Sec State.....

in response to my post. I was just making a humorous comment on Amy Goodman's appearance, and the show's apparent low end budget, which obviously has a direct correlation to Amy's 60's style liberal look. I trust you've heard the phrase, "he/she has a face for radio?"

Suggestion, try and reread your posts before actually hitting the post message box below. And I thought AF was the only one writing posts that sound like Serena Branson reporting from the Grammy Awards.

alive.

Kent state, watergate, are good examples of GOP thugs in action.

pointless?

I don't care if he is "left wing" or "right wing", illiteracy crosses both sides of the aisle.

Burglary is a thuggish activity though. The democrats are equally thuggish. They made a shambles of their own convention in 1968. After that they went around Chicago on a murdering spree against the far left supporters of the civil rights movements.

As is almost alwys the case with these guys, they "jump" the commenter and leave the discussion point unanswered. Demonize her if you want, but dragging the guy out in such a brutal is "ok" with rightees??

But the Branch Davidians were an armed suicide cult.  They'd already shot several Federal agents.  Then they soaked their compound with gasoline and, when the Feds started breaking their doors down, set the place on fire.  It wasn't murder.  It was mass suicide.

No, it's not all right.  But are you so clueless you don't even know that the OP, Mr. Wonka, is among the more left-leaning posters here?  But I guess that conflicts with your message so you've blocked it out.

-- Modified on 2/21/2011 3:03:21 PM

You know me, GaGa, I try, as always, to be gentle with my words (LOL)!  And don't insult Chavez and Castro!  But my point still  stands; nuguy is not the sharpest knife in the  drawer.  (Now you can flame me for going too easy on him,  too! LOL!)

It was murder when you include the children killed there.

Amy Goodman is a reward winning journalist, and the ONLY American journalist who had the balls to risk her life to uncover a genocide happening in East Timor. Blond bimbos may be fun to look at, but they aren't very informative.

I'm not exactly left leaning. I would say that I'm to the left of Castro. Chavez? I dunno. That's debatable.

Right, but who killed them?  I'd say it  was Koresh and his sick crew.  They're the ones who doused the place with gasoline and set it on fire.

I'm disagreeing with you about your assertion it was mass suicide. The children had no say in the matter - and given what we know about Koresh and his bulldogs, I'm betting most of the women didn't either (although they were old enough to know they were making certain choices). That makes it mass murder, with only a few suicides.

my note followe d and was responding to "stCroix"..read it and then maybe you get my comment??

the note above was to you my friend.

and the rest of the neo-stalinists. Castro OTOH is a moderate stalinist. Castro is an old school stalinist "cult of personality" dictator. Chavez and Putin have one hand in communism and the other in capitalism.
WW is a reformist liberal. He thinks that capitalism can be reformed into communism. Chavez and Putin are the more pragmatic of the bunch They know that capitalism can't be reformed and they dont give a fuck. They have countries to run so they play the hands that they have been dealt. Besides, capitalism can be a useful tool if it is properly applied.

Willy has made literally thousands of posts, and while I have disagreed with almost (notice I said almost) all of them, I was able to read and understand every one of them.

I too make spelling mistakes all the time,so fucking sue me if you like.

they really don't have a sense of humor. Hell, I'm surprised the American Migraine Advocacy group didn't trash me for my comment about Serene Branson. Did I mention she is a beautiful blonde? And yes, I do like my news, breakfast and coffee delivered by a blonde bimbo vs slanted commentary by someone who doubles for Gloria Steinem.

...didn't you mean "award-winning?"
Hint: (and not just to WW).  It's really simple to read back through a new post before hitting the "post message" button.  I still make errors despite this but it does cut them down.

...that despite the fact you obviously were commenting on the post by St. Croix, your comment completely ignored that fact that the entire thread was started by one  of the board's leading lefties.  If you still don't get why my response to you was  spot on, well, gosh, I'm not surprised.  Everybody else commenting on my  post seemed to get it.

Spelling?  WW spelled "reward" perfectly!  He gets a gold star for that!