And now Hillary’s lawyer is being indicted....

Read part 1 of the Mueller report. The Russian government interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump. Trump campaign officials were in contact with Russian operatives. The only reason conspiracy to defraud the United States charges were not brought was because the intent of the Russians could not be determined as they were all residing in Russia.  The charge against the lawyer for the Clinton campaign was for allegedly not informing the FBI that he was working for the campaign when he brought allegations to the FBI of electronic contact between a Russian bank and the Trump org.

Here on earth 1 the Mueller investigation was not predicated by the Steele opposition research nor was it ginned up by the Clinton campaign.  I have zero interest in your partisan propaganda video. Keep believing the lies. You can't handle the truth.

the Steele Dossier was originally started on behalf of a right-wing newspaper. But don't tell LostScum that.

http://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/17/us/politics/michael-sussman-russia-investigation.html
A prominent lawyer pleads not guilty in the inquiry examining the Russia investigation.
.
"... The indictment centers on whether Mr. Sussmann lied about who he was representing at a September 2016 meeting with a top F.B.I. lawyer. At that meeting, Mr. Sussmann provided analysis by cybersecurity researchers who said that unusual internet data might indicate a covert communications channel between computer servers associated with the Trump Organization and with Alfa Bank, a Kremlin-linked financial institution.
.
"The indictment says Mr. Sussmann falsely told the F.B.I. lawyer that he had no clients, but he was really representing both a technology executive and the Hillary Clinton campaign. Mr. Sussmann’s lawyers deny that he ever said he had no clients, and contend that he was there on behalf of only the executive and not Mrs. Clinton’s campaign.
.
"The F.B.I. looked into the concerns about Alfa Bank but found insufficient evidence to support them, and the special counsel who later took over the Russia investigation, Robert S. Mueller III, ignored the matter in his final report. ..."
.
1. EVERYONE in DC knew that Sussman's firm worked for the DNC (Dem Nat'l Committee). The top FBI lawyer who interviewed Sussman knew Sussman personally and presumably knew that Sussman and his firm, Perkins Coie, was heavily involved with Dem politicians.  And Sussman knew that the FBI lawyer knew.
2. Both the FBI and, later, Mueller, looked into the security data regarding Alfa Bank and Trump Org and did not pursue it further.  
3. Sussman claims that he did disclose that he was conveying info on behalf of the tech executive client (who is a Dem supporter). ... As of now, in the news, it's a he said - she said; recordings, contemporaneous notes, or memos will eventually come out at trial.  
4. When Sussman (allegedly) lies to the FBI about a detail considered to be trivial and irrelevant by many lawyers commenting on the indictment it's a death penalty offense to the Trumpists. When Flynn pleads guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts with foreign officials, the lying only came out as the consequence of a Trump witch hunt. (Flynn lied to Pence, too, but the DoJ didn't investigate that.)
.
5. When real security / IT experts find evidence of unusual activity between Alfa Bank computers and Trump Org computers (even though it was insufficient evidence to justify further DoJ investigation at that time), it's "Trumped-up" (pun intended) falsification according to the Trumpists. I have not seen any legitimate account questioning the Alfa - Trump Org data, only its significance to justify further investigation. There was some sort of "computer talk" between Alfa Bank and Trump Org.  
.
When Mike Lindell claims to have 37 terabytes of computer data proving that China flipped thousands of Trump votes in all 50 states that Lindell's own computer experts say is worthless "extremely rudimentary metadata," Trumpists are all for using it to reverse the elections!  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6jL3Z3QJrg (Lindell interview)
http://www.thedailybeast.com/mypillow-guy-mike-lindells-cyber-expert-admits-they-have-no-proof-of-election-hack
MyPillow Guy’s ‘Cyber Expert’ Admits They Have No Proof of Election Hack
.
"... Throughout the first day of the symposium, several cyber experts who had traveled to Sioux Falls to attend in person and examine the packet captures had become frustrated and irritated that Lindell failed to provide any data, with one attendee saying they’d only been shown “random garbage that wastes our time.”
.
"According to Merritt, that’s because there was nothing to reveal. The “packet captures are unrecoverable in the data” and “the data, as provided, cannot prove a cyberincursion by China,” he told the Times.
.
" “So our team said, we’re not going to say that this is legitimate if we don’t have confidence in the information,” Merritt said. ..."

The biggest lie was trump's Big Lie was that the 2020 election stolen from him. He lost. He's a loser who can't accept reality and neither can you.  The majority of Americans voted him out of office because he was a horrible, lying, corrupt, inept president. Get over him and get over it.

Thanks for showing once again what an uneducated loser you are.  To use language you'll understand:
"Motherfucker PLEASE," don't even try to pretend you graduated high school!

"horrible, lying, corrupt, inept president", you have also described Biden, and he's only been in office 8 months. If you need details proving each one of these, let me know.

...me or CDL.  As soon as he stops shitting his pants and agrees to put his membership on the line as I have.

Don't bother CDL. I'm sure you will manufacture your usual partisan, mendacious, fairy tale about Biden.  You can spare me your assault on the truth. However here is one major difference between these presidents: Biden won the 2020 election convincingly and trump lost decisively. The election wasn't rigged  - only a childish, cry-baby loser claims that without credible evidence.  After a single term in office, Trump was fired by a majority of the voters. The majority of Americans had enough of the Trump presidency and wanted Biden instead. As Roberto Duran would famously say "no mas".

No Lost, we are really sick of you and all your bullshit.

to say charges were not brought because they didn't have any evidence.  Conversely, if they had even a shred of evidence that would stand up in court, don't you think they would have filed charges against Trump?  You still want to drink the Kool-aid.  I find that interesting that you don't follow the FACTS, rather than the speculation.  In American jurisprudence, we have a concept called "no evidence, no conviction."  If you can't convict, you look pretty silly bringing charges.  

Bah 😂 ha 😂 ha 😂 ha 😂 ha 😂 ha 😂 ha!! Look snowflake you cats are the ones who full of it!  

Back in September of 2021, the liberals of BlueAnon Twitter took a “move along, nothing to see here” approach to Sussman’s indictment of lying to the FBI about the alleged Alfa Bank/Trump connection.

to cut a deal with the Feds because he knows how dirty and corrupt Hillary is, but I have two words for him to think about . . . . Vince Foster.  

He’s got leverage if he cooperates, however the risks are too high if he doesn’t fall on his sword and take the rap while protecting the co-conspirators.

Vince Foster, huh?  I guess you really love those old conspiracy theories as much as you love the new conspiracy theories. You just can't stop spreading disinformation and debunked conspiracy theories, can you?

Sussman are a conspiracy theory?  That's a stretch, even for you.  

I never mentioned Sussman. Claiming that Clinton is responsibility for Foster's death is the extreme right-wing conspiracy theory but that's right in your wheel house.

what you do best.  

I'm doing no such thing. You brought up Foster and my reply was to that old, tired, debunked  conspiracy theory.

because Hillary says so?  Good luck with that.  She also denied knowledge of where the 35,000 emails disappeared to, called all of the women accusing her husband of sexual harassment liars, and denied being involved in the Russian collusion hoax (you know, the one her attorney is being prosecuted for), so I think if Hillary says she had nothing to do with Vince getting whacked, you just HAVE to believe her.  Hey, while I have you here, do you want to buy a famous bridge?  

Of course it has been debunked. It's nonsense. Otherwise the Clintons would have prosecuted. You believe it because you hate them. Just admit it. And there is no Russian collusion hoax. Russian interfered in the 2016 election for the benefit of trump and trump campaign officials had multiple interactions with Russian operatives and cutouts. Read part 1 of the Mueller report. The contacts between the trump election officials and the Russians is well established and well documented.

Muller spent two years investigating and all he could come up with were tenuous connections between officials who worked for Trump and the Russians. Yet no evidence of actual collusion. That’s why the Democrats didn’t impeach Trump for it.

The connections between the trump campaign and Russian operatives or cutouts we're hardly tenuous. There were dozens of interactions that were documented.  Collusion with Russians is not a crime, per se. The crime would be conspiracy to defraud the United States.  Proving conspiracy to defraud requires the intent of both parties to the potential conspiracy. It was impossible to investigate the intent of the Russians since they were in Russia.  

indict ANY of Trump's advisors for collusion with the Russians makes it still a criminal conspiracy, buy you will give a pass to Sussman, Hillary's own lawyer, who HAS been indicted?  Are you by any chance a Democrat?   Lol