Who is Dr. Robert Malone? He’s the guy who *invented* mRNA vaccines. Why did they suspend him? Who knows. Maybe it’s because he’s said that 500,000 people who died from Covid could have been saved by giving them early treatment with Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Oh, think he’s some crackpot? Think again. He’s worked on every major viral outbreak since HIV, developing treatment for Zika, MERS, West Nile. He’s been involved in over 100 clinical studies. He’s run billion dollar government programs for vaccine development. He’s one of the leading experts in the world on this subject and Twitter just said he’s not allowed on their platform. Could it be that the reason why is because he’s called out members of the FDA who personally put up road blocks to ivermectin so they could collect kick backs from Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson? And that the same individuals who put up these road blocks are personally responsible for the opioid epidemic in the United States. Did you know that hydroxychloroquine was successfully used to treat SARS 1? And it one of the few antivirals that safe for pregnant women? We have a deeply corrupt healthcare regulatory system and the rot all stems from big pharma.

He's a little....

…meaningful or worthwhile to the board let me know, Nicky.

http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/
Robert Malone claims to have invented mRNA technology. Why is he trying so hard to undermine its use?
.
"... Why is the ***self-described inventor of the mRNA vaccines*** working so hard to undermine them? ..."
.
"... Wherever he appears, Malone is billed as the inventor of mRNA vaccines. It’s in his Twitter bio. “I literally invented mRNA technology when I was 28,” says Malone, who is now 61. If that’s true—or, more to the point, if Malone believes it to be true—then you might expect him to be championing a very different message in his media appearances. ..."
.
"... The abridged version is that when Malone was a graduate student in biology in the late 1980s at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, he injected genetic material—DNA and RNA—into the cells of mice in hopes of creating a new kind of vaccine. He was the first author on a 1989 paper demonstrating how RNA could be delivered into cells using lipids, which are basically tiny globules of fat, and a co-author on a 1990 Science paper showing that if you inject pure RNA or DNA into mouse muscle cells, it can lead to the transcription of new proteins. ..."
.
[NOTE: Merck scientists had injected RNA into cells in the 1960s -- 20 years before Malone -- looking for potentially useful biological effects. They didn't understand the results at the time, and did not pursue them at the time, but they had stumbled upon RNA interference before it was known as such.]
.
"... In any case, it’s clear enough that Malone isn’t singularly responsible for mRNA vaccines. The process of achieving major scientific advancements tends to be more cumulative and complex than the apple-to-the-head stories we usually tell, but this much can be said for sure: Malone was involved in groundbreaking work related to mRNA vaccines before it was cool or profitable; and he and others who believed in the potential of RNA-based vaccines in the 1980s turned out to be world-savingly correct. ..."

Living off his name to make a buck off the weak and stupid. There's a market for snake charmers like him in this covid world...suckers are born every minute.

Having just read it, it comes off as written by a moron. He also failed to mention the 10 different patents that Malone has on inventing mRNA vaccine technology. You could just listen to the podcast and make your own determination if he’s credible or not.

Is he making a buck by selling vaccines or is he saying that informed consent is impossible because they’re hiding the side effects of the vaccines found in the test data?

you could just stop talking in tongues.

From Dr. Malone’s substack:

Many inventions / discoveries have many fathers, some disputed, some  not.  
Ray Damadian performed early (the earliest?) experiments and conceived the idea of MRI. He got very little credit and no Nobel Prize recognition which went to others. His work and patents are worthy of credit but were not sufficiently enabling to be central to the first commercial MRIs.
.
Douglas Prasher isolated and cloned the gene for GFP as a young researcher at Woods Hole. He published papers and gave away the clones freely to anyone who asked. But his grant renewals didn't get funded. Tsien and Chalfie, who received GFP materials from Prasher and did experiments that Prasher had also proposed to do, went on the win the Nobel Prize while Prasher had spent time unemployed or driving a shuttle bus for a car dealership.  Everything that Prasher did was enabling. W/o Prasher, others would have needed several more years to get the GFP clones on their own.
.
And many more.
.
The early work of Malone was important but his patents are not sufficiently enabling. To make mRNA vaccines work, you needed another 25 years of R&D by hundreds of researchers and many hundreds (thousands?) of publications and patents. I think that scientists give plenty of credit to Malone. The press and politicians and university admin need to keep things simpler: Weissman at U Penn; Kariko at BioNTech; several key people at Moderna; and many more.