In 1972 John Kerry was giving aid and comfort to North Vietnam by telling lies before congress, throwing away military medals publicly in protest and partying with traitor radicals such as Jane Fonda that waived Viet Cong flags and wanted commmunist North Vietnam to win and the U.S. to lose.  Kerry did all that for political gain.  He couldn't care less about our military men who were still in vietnam or even anything about vietnam. He was just self-promoting for his political career.

Now he is doing the same w/Iraq. Saying everything Bush did was wrong, then saying he'd do what Bush did, then saying he'd do it differently, then saying he wouldn't do anything at all.
THE TERRORIST ARE JUST GETTING EMBOLDENED BY KERRY'S IDIOTIC STATEMENTS.

The terrorist want John Kerry to win cause they think he will cut and run.  The terrorists know that John Kerry is a man of no character.

I have the perfect description for John Kerry- he is a parasite. He feeds off people and institutions and damages everything he touches.

JOHN KERRY IS A PARASITE. Compare Kerry's idiotic Iraq  statements to George Bush's brilliant speech at the UN.  Bush stood before all those representatives of tin pot murderous dictators and talked about Democracy and human dignity and how freedom will overcome oppression.  Cuba, Vietnam, China- They now know that Bush is not gonna back down when it comes to fighting terrorism.  They hope that that no character parasite Kerry wins.  He's the kind of man they want to deal with. Hey, I bet those are the super duper secret allies he was talking to in secret.

Kerry has no backbone!!!! Terrorists gleeful for his victory!!!! Viva Bush!!!!!

"The terrorist are just getting emboldened by Kerry's idiotic statements."

And how do we know they are not getting emboldened by Bush's idiotic actions?  Committing our scarce resources in an unwinnable, undeclared, un-war in Iraq.

He's really vindicating the Vietnam experience here, helping us relive that gallstone in our history, showing us how it could be "done right."  

/Zin

This is similar to recent statements by Dennis Hastert basically saying we'll be attacked if Kerry wins...The only thing worse than saying this, are the people who actually believe it....

It's truly amazing; the right will say & do absolutely anything to win this election....They have zero shame...

This is similar to recent statements by Howard Dean basically saying there will be a draft if Bush wins...The only thing worse than saying this, are the people who actually believe it..

It's truly amazing; the left will say & do absolutely anything to win this election....They have zero shame.....

Given the parlous state of the country and our armed forces, I should say the GOP is showing no shame IN CONTESTING THIS ELECTION AT ALL!

If my son behaved like, W, running the caddy into a major ditch, and emptying the bank account and maxing out the credit cards, I'd apologise to the judge and slink away.  W acts like he's been gilded!

I can think of A 1000 reasons for W to go on TV and make a profound apology to the nation and get his ass back to Texas, so he can apologise to all the folks there he's screwed over!

factor in that he started WITH NO MANDATE AT ALL-
NADER would have done a better Job!

-- Modified on 9/22/2004 5:27:27 PM

the draft issue actually was seriously discussed (although in the very basic stages) by elected members of our government.  The al-Qaeda statement is pure conjecture, and in conflict with what the facts have been, which is that terrorist recruitment has been doing well because the "Great Satan" (that's us) now has such an identifyable figurehead.

Isn't what Denny Hastert is saying the flip side of "the terrorists hate and will attack us more because of Iraq" argument espoused by none other than the Swift Boat kite surfer?

Take away the spin coming from each side and it basically comes down to this:

The lose coalition of murderous, goat-fucking islamic terrorist groups are going to continue to pursue their perverted cause no matter who is President, and regardless of whether or not the U.S. had invaded Iraq and removed Saddam. The question is, who do you want leading the fight against these worms. On that issue, I see Kerry as being tragically indecisive.

RLTW

As opposed to Bush who is tragically precipitous? In a fight, I'll take the cannon that responds to C&C!  The loose one seems to have blown his legs off and clearly his medulla....

I'll take the devil we don't know.  I just can't see him doing as much damage as this one has already.  Besides, I liked feeling a touch up on the Euros, instead of having to apologise all the time.  And knowing that my President is not as sage as Silvio Fucking Berlusconi, a living argument for the Red Brigades, is wearing me down.

When Jacques Chirac can run leadership rings around our leader, its time for a change! Of course, Benito M. might have been a more effective war leader than Bush, so I should be so lucky.  Ferdinand Marcos was a touch less corrupt.

Kerry has never been on the correct side of any issue in the last 35 years.  He gave aid and comfort to North Vietnam. He was against Reagans plan that won the cold war. He was against the Gulf 1 war, he wants to try and buy-off these terrorists.  We must destroy the terrorists, the Wahabi fanatic terrorists must be destroyed.  Backing down emboldens them. (That's my opinion)  I don't hate Kerry, I just do not want him to be president.  Just like RLTW said, Kerry is to indecisive.
P.S. I will stop calling Kerry names.

Jacques Chirac?? France??
10% Unemployment rate.
Running a CF'd welfare state.
Allowed 1000's to die during a fucking heat wave.
UN Oil for Food corruption scandal.
Countless other corruption charges.
Obstructing Turkey from entering EU (probably a good thing for Turkey).
Growing anti-semitism, growing problems with Muslim immigrants.
More that I don't have time to list, etc.

Yeah, Chirac! What a leader. I was tempted to type out some unflattering words about you, but I like you too much Sully.

You are seriously wacked though. Put away those Chomsky books.

RLTW

Thanks for making my point for me.  You are quickening up some....

Kerry just called the Prime Minister of Iraq a liar about the conditions of Iraq.  

Kerry also just gave more aid and comfort to the terrorists by saying that the elections should not be held in Iraq because of the terrorists creating unstability.

Kerry is ending his carrier the same way he started it- Giving aid to the enemy, having total disregard for other countries fighting for democracy and demoralizing U.S. military.

KERRY DOES NOT HAVE A CLUE.  KERRY IS TO INDECISIVE. KERRY CANNOT BE PRESIDENT.