He may assign Melania to promote Prostitutional rights (big win for us), and
Bannon to protect his supporters' Constipational rights.

You know who introduced Flag Protection Act of 2005 ? .......

Quote :
The Flag Protection Act of 2005 was a proposed United States federal law introduced by Senators Hillary Clinton and Robert Bennett. The law would have outlawed flag burning, and called for a punishment of one year in jail and a fine of $100,000.[1][2]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_Protection_Act_of_2005

Once again, Loathsome Laffy revels in his disgusting bigotry, wallowing like swine in the slop of blatant racism and hate mongering.

Re: You know who introduced Flag Protection Act of 2005 ? .......

Nicely done, T.

You are conversing with a dude that is "proud" when someone burns the flag, like Hamas or ISIS.

My post must have really gotten under your skin.

I didn't even vote, so when I say we I mean the people who voted.

He would NEVER vote for someone who thought the "constitution sucks." Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!!

I am with you on this one Laffy but I dont take any pride seeing the flag burned. The actual act saddens me, but nothing says we are free more than the act of being granted the choice to be able to destroy our own symbols, if we so chose, as protest. I am not shocked Mr. Trump would pander to his base with this sort of diatribe but not sure what Mrs. Clinton was thinking in 2005.

While she introduced her own Anti flag burning bill in 2005, she voted against such a bill in 2006.

Much like discussing a cockroach problem with the exterminator, I don't actually talk to the cockroach itself.
Check again Jack, you'll find the syntax is third person, which is more than the little cockroach deserved.

They just forgive you, and continue to accept you into the soup kitchen, give you beans and bucks and let you take (mooch) from the food pantry.

but I will concede that while it was technically a "direct reply" to LTM, your syntax did indicate you were talking "about him" and not "to him"

and look how happy is the Laffy

-- Modified on 11/29/2016 11:52:27 AM

I'm proud to live in a country where they don't get thrown in jail for it.  I also hate Nazis, but I am proud to live in a country where they are permitted to march in Skokie to demonstrate their First Amendment rights.  Standing up for someone's right to say something you agree with is NOT why we have the First Amendment.  We have it to stand up for someone's right to say something that pisses us off.  Once they no longer have that right, how long do you think it will be before YOUR right to speak is taken away?

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

...as he takes their hand outs.

See how you didn't have to lie and back the truck up like Laffy did in attempt to conceal his dishonesty and idiocy?

Just don't expect it to happen too often

Like the time not long ago when you "changed your mind" about what the market would do when the Fed raised rates after it was clear to the rest of the world your original view of a 1,000-point plunge was clearly WRONG.  I predict you will also be proven wrong on many of your other Norstradamus-like bets such as Trump's YUGE conflicts of interest and what will happen to the ACA, among many, many other things.
Your boy is also proving to be a First-Amendment-hating nut job and his potential pick of Petraeus for State shows what a hypocrite he was when he gave Hillary shit about playing fast and loose with classified documents.  I actually like the General despite that but for Trump to consider him is laughable.  Still, anyone would be better than Giuliani, who is both nuts and also compromised by conflicts of interest.
I really can't wait for this to play out.

situations change and so do my opinions when they do. That fed meeting hasn't even happened yet, so it's not like I am changing my tune after the fact. If Hillary had won, the market would most definitely have tanked with the up coming interest rate hikes. Rising interest rates in a robust economy are accepted in stride. Interest rates in a dead economy like we have had for years results in money coming out of stocks and into fixed rate instruments causing the market to sell off.

And now for some real facts about the history you have weakly tried to re-write:
1) You DID change your tune after ONE fact: after you predicted the market would dive by 1,000 points it went up by 500 on the next two days.  It was after THAT you "changed your mind" instead of admitting the painful truth: you had been WRONG. Nice euphemism though.
2) I don't think I know what my "ilk" is, but I made NO prediction on what the market would do.  Unlike you. So please don't pt words in my mouth.
3) He's "off to a GREAT start?" LMAO!  The market taking off because it imagines what he MIGHT do has nothing to do with Trump himself, who just announced today his Sec. of Treasury will be a Goldman, Sachs insider (and so is Bannon).  His continued tweets are beyond embarrassing and would cause any sentient observer to question his sanity.
Then again, anyone who still worships St. Reagan, that empty suit who put us on the path towards gigantic deficits probably thinks Donnie farts rainbows.
4) "Obama's economy" has created millions of jobs.  And the fact that growth has been stuck around 2% is hardly his fault.  Blame that on Republicans who have stonewalled everything for the past 6 years and a world economy that has been suffering worse than ours, making robust growth impossible.  You do know it's a world economy, don't you, Wu?

This is a perfect teachable moment, demonstrating how the Left’s expectations are the law and Constitution should or will change simply because someone of power or a group of people simply do not like the effect of the law or Constitutional meaning.

I predicted the market would tank AFTER an interest rate increase, that increase hasn't even happened yet. You lie almost as badly as LTM.  

So you're now saying the Dow WILL drop 1,000 points after the Fed raises rates 1/4 point next month?  Either way, it's not what you've said earlier.  You have hereby lost the right to call anyone else a liar (except, of course, Taffy, LOL).
Pura vida, pera.

I seriously doubt he learned

My original statement, before the election was that "if" the Fed raised rates next month the Dow would drop a thousand points, that was before Trump hit the ground running and changed everything and now everyone's outlook is for robust economic growth as opposed to the anemic growth expected under Clinton. NOW it looks like the rate hike coming in a couple of weeks is only going to be the first in a series of very necessary hikes to keep the expected new economy from overheating.  

No matter how how you twist, turn and contort yourself you have just basically agreed with me.  
The Fed has basically already said it's raising rates next month by a 1/4 point so that rate rise is baked into the Dow.  But then you "changed your mind" because of Trump's win.  Thus, when you made your original prediction you were WRONG but are too big a weasel to admit it.
So chupa mi pene., pretzel man