Well this is who they say/think it is.

EVERYTHING the whistleblower has said has been verified by all the other witnesses who've testified. The whatever his background, he has been proven RIGHT.

I said very early on that this looks to have had "John Brennan's fingerprints all over it"  Whether it's true or not still remains to be seen, but it does appear I might have been onto something, and unlike our lying moocher, I make my predictions right here, not on some fantasy board that no one else has ever seen.

I simply posted a link to an article that claims to know who the whistleblower is and named him. I did not even  say or imply I believe it is correct or not.  

are said to "speak for themselves."   If this gets to a trial in the Senate, OPINIONS of witnesses will be excluded as evidence if they contradict the available documentation, which in this case, is the transcript itself.   Once a witness that was one of the people who created the transcript authenticates it as "true and correct", how anyone else "interprets" it is irrelevant.  This is a meatless hamburger.  

Did you read the part of Vindman's statement that the transcript was fiddled with? I wonder why they did that? Obviously it's worse than even the public version is. Also, the "OPINIONS" of witnesses are their sworn testimony of what actually happened and are remarkably consistent, except for the lies of Trump's stooge Sondman

The transcript is one of the documents and it remains to be seen if it was complete or not. There is TESTIMONY from others that has NOTHING to do with the transcript or their interpretation of the transcript.  

1) swallowpee is a dumbass.
2) swallowpee believes the whistleblower is a partisan liar.
3) swallowpee is an ancient, angry buffoon.
4) swallowpee is a hack.
5) swallowpee hates the truth
6) swallowpee is a lying guttersnipe and scupper trout.
7) All of the above.
2019 = Go Nats!
2020 = Biden!

You know as in being played like a fiddle. Just because vindman’s statement says is was fiddled with does not mean it  was. I wonder why he is lying?

are "fiddled" with so that they translate correctly to English.  Like I said, once the translators who wrote the transcript authenticate it,  NO opinion testimony is relevant.  I have watched many court proceedings were an attorney tries to introduce opinion testimony about what a document says.  The other attorney just objects and says the document speaks for itself.  The court ALWAYS sustains such an objection.  In other words, the jurors are expected to just read the document, and decide for themselves what it says or means, based only on what is contained within the four corners of the document.  Leaking opinion testimony is just more of Schiff's irrelevant circus.  

Tell us how it is you KNOW Vindman is lying? You have now gone on record as saying a combat veteran who was wounded for this country is a liar. How do you KNOW this? The answer is, you DON'T. That means YOU are a LIAR and nothing more than vermin without honor.
How much does it suck to be a lying stooge? A henchman without integrity?  A running dog of Putin?

The "fiddling" Vindman described was NOT a translation issue. The omissions were things like Trump claiming there were recordings of  Biden discussing corruption.  I'd beg you to stop embarrassing yourself but know it's pointless.

You in your above post said “Did you read the part of Vindman's statement that the transcript was fiddled with? I wonder why they did that? “

You get bitch slapped and put in your place and you have another hissy fit….sad

is what the lying huckster gives us.  The GOP are not allowed to report on what transpired in the secret depos, so all we get is what Schiff wants to sensationalize for the media.  

You seem especially cranky today. Did they cut your ration of gruel at the Happy Home?

Can we please get someone to interpret his latest word salad? ROFL. But keep on declaring victory and patting yourself on the back. It's hilarious. Talk about a hissy fit. Please go unwad your panties, little girl.

that you know, but you want to count the Schiff fantasies as facts.  They aren't.