Headline: "Kamala Harris's husband Doug Emhoff 'forcefully slapped ex-girlfriend for flirting with another man' in booze-fueled assault after date to star-studded gala"

I know how important facts are to you so this query should pose no problem.

Explanation please.

No. I’m not voting for Trump. But your point belies the newsworthiness of this story.  It highlights the fact that Emhoff isn’t the man that the Harris campaign is trying to portray him as.

Why not?

I’ve been consistent about this going back to the polling that showed over 60% voters did not want a Trump- Biden rematch. Was looking forward to backing a No Labels ticket. But they didn’t field a ticket.

What is it specifically about Trump that is causing you not to vote for him?

I don’t like his approach on Ukraine and am not happy he’s still campaigning on the outcome of the 2020 election.

Mollie Hemingway:

And you read the article, so you know who made the allegations.

Three friends of "Jane" have explained how they learned of the assault.  "Jane" was contacted by the reporter but declined to comment.  Note that "Jane" declined to comment rather than to DENY the incident.
.
Laura Loomer has unearthed a picture of the couple in a frame of a video taken at the Cannes Film Festival event in France.  This proves he was at the event that day with some woman.
.
"One of her friends told DailyMail.com that the woman called him immediately after the incident, sobbing in her cab, and described the alleged assault."
.
"A second friend said Jane, who had been dating Emhoff for three months, also told her about the alleged violence at the time."
.
"A third friend told DailyMail.com that Jane first told her in 2014 that she had dated Emhoff, and recounted the full story of his alleged abuse in 2018..."

The nanny.

Are we done yet? Yes I think so.

So you think the Daily Mail is going to risk a defamation suit without getting all their ducks in a row before publishing this allegation?

So first, they trotted out Walz and when that had no effect, they point to Doug-the-nanny-fucker.   That didn't work ether, so they doubled down by saying these two are "redefining masculinity."  Apparently, there aren't many men in the US who identify with this brand of masculinity.   Every time Walz prances around the stage with his jazz hands waving, I can't help but crack up.   Last night, Vance wiped up the floor with Walz.  I couldn't stop laughing reading the editorial from Politico declaring Walz the winner of the debate.  

And as far as masculinity, at least Walz doesn't have tiny hands. I'll also take any form of masculinity as long as it isn't "grab 'em by the pussy."

We have no clue about the facts here. All just "friends" said this or that. Nothing has come directly from the woman allegedly slapped so it's all second hand info anyway. Plus he is not running for office, his wife is, which makes this all moot.

As the republican men have a penchant for such.

"grab 'em by the pussy."   If they are heavy-duty flirting with you, it can be done with no downside, but you have to be able to read women really well.  I wouldn't recommend doing it randomly, but in the right situation after a few drinks, it can be welcomed more than you think.  

Bah 🤣 ha 🤣 ha 🤣 ha 🤣 ha

"The ex-girlfriend of Kamala Harris’ husband says she’s disgusted by the “fake perfect spouse” persona because she says he abused her.  
.
Emhoff’s ex-girlfriend claims he slapped her in the face so hard she spun around at a 2012 celebrity event in France."  

and Harris' alleged plagiarism. This after attempts to smear Walz with fake charges of child abuse failed. This is what campaigns do when they're running scared.
But of course Loooooser ignores the new charges of Trump teaming up with Epstein in a groping contest. Right.

Negative stories are not just pushed by losing campaigns. In American politics, they are trademarks of winning campaigns as well. Think of Kerry getting Swift Boated. McCain having an interracial child out of wedlock (the child was adopted). The Obama campaign claiming Romney wanted to put black people back into slavery.

in saying you are skeptical of a one-source story when you post a link to an article that does not back what you are claiming?

moving to South Korea because the Korean government just instituted a subsidy that allows the public to hire a nanny and are only out of pocket $7 an hour while the government pays the difference.  He might already be on the way there.  

but the one against Trump isn't.
Of course a knee-jerk fool like you would believe that.