Politics and Religion

Hrrrrmph!
Hpygolky 233 Reviews 645 reads
posted
1 / 15

Going on their yearly vacation. Guy shops for the best package, hotel, air. So when he checks his bags at the terminal, bang, he get hit a baggage fee that was more then he expected. Really, what was the point with withdrawing this rule.. Oh I forgot,it was a Obama rule..I get it now.
trump, our petty lil president.

GaGambler 51 reads
posted
2 / 15

It's a "proposed" rule made just as Obama was leaving office and never was enacted.

 
After reading the actual proposed rule, I am less likely to agree with you than after reading the headline. This regulation reads like many other Obama regulations, it's redundant, poorly written and It's timing looks to be yet another "fuck you" to business on his way out the door.

JakeFromStateFarm 51 reads
posted
3 / 15

The fact that it technically was a "proposed rule" and not an actual "rule," while true, is totally beside the point.  Because it was already restraining airlines like Delta from imposing a bag fee on Economy ticket buyers.  And if you'd take then time to carefully read the article, you'd have noticed that Delta re-imposed the fee on Dec. 6th, three DAYS ago.  So your focus on the word "proposed" is a classic distinction without a difference because it was in effect.
See here, Wu, if you're going to try to be a bigger Pedantic Putz than Conan, for God's sake at least get it right.
ROFL

GaGambler 50 reads
posted
4 / 15

First off Delta is not "re-imposing" anything this a a new fee as the article plainly states. Secondly, the fee was not going to be prohibited under the PROPOSED rule, it was only required that the fee be disclosed.

 
You are assuming "cause and effect" while the article only states that the two events coincide.  

 
I can't believe you feel qualified to lecture to anyone about not being able to read. Now please go back to arguing with FM until you can at least read at a third grade level.

JakeFromStateFarm 59 reads
posted
5 / 15

You are trying desperately to defend your error by seizing on "re?"  LMAO.  And you deny "cause and effect" when one act followed the other by THREE DAYS?  And obviously it's about disclosure.  That's what the "rule" was about. Man, you are WEAK.
It's sad you can't admit it when you're WRONG and have to parse meaningless minutia like the Pedantic Putz you are.
Go back to slicing salami.

GaGambler 51 reads
posted
6 / 15

Not about this you idiot, but earlier I said that you had reached rock bottom. That is what I was wrong about.

You have truly become TSTTT, have fun arguing with FM and doing your fg imitation.

JakeFromStateFarm 54 reads
posted
7 / 15

Of course not.  You are a relentless nit-picker who is almost Talmudic in your futile efforts to debate.  You attempts here to pick at minor points while ignoring the larger one is typical. The only thing we agree on is that TSTTT applies here.  To YOU.

mattradd 40 Reviews 66 reads
posted
8 / 15

That was a perfect description of Ed2000. BTW, where is good old Ed?

JakeFromStateFarm 57 reads
posted
9 / 15

GaGa studied at their knee, where he learned how to pick many nits.

DUANE 33 Reviews 49 reads
posted
10 / 15

I think Ed gave up on the idea that there would be any rational discussion here.  I can see where he was coming from.

mattradd 40 Reviews 47 reads
posted
11 / 15

However, you do know that you are insulting everyone, on the left, right and in the middle with your broad brush! ;)

DUANE 33 Reviews 54 reads
posted
12 / 15
mattradd 40 Reviews 53 reads
posted
13 / 15

If I were a right-winger and you were a left-winger I'd call you elitist! ;)

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 46 reads
posted
14 / 15

And you knew about the "Rule" all this time...yeah, OK. I bet trump didn't read or comprehend the "rule". It just had Obama's name on it.
You probably didn't even know about this un-enacted rule till this thread. Then you went to your bible, Breitbart and viola, you stumbled across their point of view...Look, it's besides the point of what I was trying to get to. It's that this was petty and small by trump to rescind this....Small hands strikes again

GaGambler 51 reads
posted
15 / 15

Don't any of you guys know how to read? Are are you just like jake, Ready, fire, aim?

 
and know of course I didn't know about this un-enacted rule until this thread, but before running off half cocked like the rest of you morons, I read the fucking rule before commenting on it.

If you had actually read the proposed rule, you would have seen it was the rule itself that was petty and cumbersome, it not only forced the airlines to disclose the fees, but to break it down on a leg by leg, bag by bag basis. Just another example of anti business, burdensome regulation that has been heaped upon businesses over the previous 8 years.

Register Now!