: Politics and Religion Discussion : History will remember

borabora 15 Reviews 784 reads

posted 10 years ago

1 / 25

When Reagan was the president, he was perceived as a buffoon who could only utter one-liners. Years later, he is remembered as possibly one of the best. Not in the top 5, possibly in the top 12.

I reckon that 20 years later, both Bill Clinton and Obama will also be ranked among top 12 by historians.

GW Bush will be lucky to land in the bottom 10, not in the bottom 5.

Either Hillary or Trump will also end up in the bottom pile along with Fillmore, Hoover, Pierce, Harding, Johnson, and Buchanan. Trump could beat Buchanan for the worst ever trophy.

Who do you rate as the best two presidents since Woodstock?

Dr Ganja, your opinion is valuable. Many here look up to you

WildJimmy! 157 reads

posted 10 years ago

2 / 25

I think it'll look different in 12-16 years. EOM

END OF MESSAGE

Badboy1234 10 Reviews 176 reads

posted 10 years ago

3 / 25

I would not identify Reagan as one of the best? EOM

END OF MESSAGE

GaGambler 241 reads

posted 10 years ago

4 / 25

Reagan was only looked at as a buffoon by die hard lefties

and thirty years has not changed their opinion.

If Reagan was so "looked down on" please explain his landslide victory in '84.

I seriously doubt Obama will ever be top twelve, or even top 40, by the we get to 50 possible choices on merit, but he will get the benefit of being the "groundbreaking" first black POTUS, which most likely will skew the numbers. As for Bill Clinton, he is already ranked rather highly

bigguy30 123 reads

posted 10 years ago

5 / 25

This poll about President Obama taken last year proves you wrong.

Also you seem to forget about the Iran Iran-Contra Affair – 1986-1987.
It was a grand scheme that violated American law and policy all around: Arms sales to Iran were prohibited; the U.S. government had long forbidden ransom of any sort for hostages; and it was illegal to fund the contras above the limits set by Congress.

So charges were brought by the prosecutor eventually resulted in the convictions of several members of the Reagan administration, including Reagan's national security adviser, Adm. John Poindexter, and his deputy, Lt. Col. Oliver North. (North's multi-count conviction was set aside on appeal.) Reagan himself was never charged with any offense, although opinions differed about his knowledge of, and culpability for, the affair.

Since you like to play the race card yourself GaG.
President Obama is a two term elected President and each time by landslides.
If you think he will just be remember, because he was the first elected black president.
You are a fool and I am not surprised either.

Posted By: GaGambler

and thirty years has not changed their opinion.

If Reagan was so "looked down on" please explain his landslide victory in '84.

I seriously doubt Obama will ever be top twelve, or even top 40, by the we get to 50 possible choices on merit, but he will get the benefit of being the "groundbreaking" first black POTUS, which most likely will skew the numbers. As for Bill Clinton, he is already ranked rather highly

Badboy1234 10 Reviews 142 reads

posted 10 years ago

6 / 25

Re: Reagan was only looked at as a buffoon by die hard lefties

Explain the greatness of Reagan to the 200+ marines that were killed by the suicide bomber in Lebanon. This gave Osama Bin Laden and other Islamic fundamentalists the impression that America would cut and run when things got tough. Also explain his and Nancy's change of position on their view of promoting stem cell research when Research was beginning to show that it may help his deteriorating condition. There was also Iran Contra. Obama did to Iraq what Nixon had the balls to do in Vietnam was to get the fuck out of a non winnable situation.

GaGambler 143 reads

posted 10 years ago

7 / 25

You REALLY need to quit copying and pasting the words of others without giving credit

It's no wonder that virtually no one takes you seriously when all you do is plagiarize the words of others.

Does ANYONE believe the first two paragraphs of your post were actually written by you? The third paragraph of course is 100% you as it looks like it was written in finger paint by a pre schooler.

Do you deny that you did NOT write the first two paragraphs of your post, yet failed to give credit to whoever you "borrowed" those words from?

PitchingWedge 91 Reviews 123 reads

posted 10 years ago

8 / 25

You are trying to say that President Obama won by "landslides"?????

A landslide is Nixon-McGovern or Reagan-Mondale.

Obama won both elections by comfortable margins but calling them landslides would be akin to calling you a wordsmith

bigguy30 105 reads

posted 10 years ago

9 / 25

PW I guess old age is really catching up with you.

This is why you sound so stupid yourself.

Posted By: PitchingWedge

A landslide is Nixon-McGovern or Reagan-Mondale.

Obama won both elections by comfortable margins but calling them landslides would be akin to calling you a wordsmith.

-- Modified on 9/21/2016 11:16:01 AM

bigguy30 123 reads

posted 10 years ago

10 / 25

GaG does anybody believe you at all on here.

You made a dumb ass comment and needed to be reminded of the truth.
So I guess your leader Trump was right about Ronald Reagan.
He stop lying for once and told the truth.
I guess one con man knows another one. Lol

Posted By: GaGambler

It's no wonder that virtually no one takes you seriously when all you do is plagiarize the words of others.

Does ANYONE believe the first two paragraphs of your post were actually written by you? The third paragraph of course is 100% you as it looks like it was written in finger paint by a pre schooler.

Do you deny that you did NOT write the first two paragraphs of your post, yet failed to give credit to whoever you "borrowed" those words from?

followme 153 reads

posted 10 years ago

11 / 25

Re: You REALLY need to quit copying and pasting the words of others without giving credit

of course plagiarist30 cannot deny it and here is the proof.

He talks about "EXPOSING" you, me and others but never does offer proof.
Well he is "EXPOSED" as a plagiarist again , as I've done several times.

Now he will I'm sure reply with a feeble attempt to divert and lie.
It really is so much fun watching him wiggle, twist and squirm.

Thank You

PitchingWedge 91 Reviews 143 reads

posted 10 years ago

12 / 25

You have no clue what my previous post even says, do you? EOM

END OF MESSAGE

GaGambler 192 reads

posted 10 years ago

13 / 25

See how easy this is, This last post was obviously written by you

It looks like a preschooler couldn't figure out whether to use finger paint or crayon and decided to use both.

bigguy30 126 reads

posted 10 years ago

14 / 25

FM you already exposed yourself yesterday and have no credibility at all.

So I would not talk, after posting this garbage comment yesterday.

Posted By: followme

of course plagiarist30 cannot deny it and here is the proof.

He talks about "EXPOSING" you, me and others but never does offer proof.
Well he is "EXPOSED" as a plagiarist again , as I've done several times.

Now he will I'm sure reply with a feeble attempt to divert and lie.
It really is so much fun watching him wiggle, twist and squirm.

Thank You

bigguy30 96 reads

posted 10 years ago

15 / 25

You need to look in the mirror at yourself old man and the facts are clear.

You on the other hand.
Just want to keep making a fool out of yourself on here.

Posted By: PitchingWedge

bigguy30 217 reads

posted 10 years ago

16 / 25

GaG you have nothing and pissed off your own stupidity was exposed.

You don't know anything and try to act so smart on here.
The problem for you, I know the real truth about you GaG.

So you should go to Hollywood and try acting.
I love it, when people act fake tough on here.
Thanks for the laughs old man.

Posted By: GaGambler

It looks like a preschooler couldn't figure out whether to use finger paint or crayon and decided to use both.

-- Modified on 9/21/2016 11:49:51 AM

bigguy30 91 reads

posted 10 years ago

17 / 25

FM kissing ass does not make you sound any smarter either. Lol eom

Posted By: followme

of course plagiarist30 cannot deny it and here is the proof.

He talks about "EXPOSING" you, me and others but never does offer proof.
Well he is "EXPOSED" as a plagiarist again , as I've done several times.

Now he will I'm sure reply with a feeble attempt to divert and lie.
It really is so much fun watching him wiggle, twist and squirm.

Thank You

-- Modified on 9/21/2016 11:53:45 AM

followme 80 reads

posted 10 years ago

18 / 25

Re: First of all plagiarist30

What does your reply have to do with the fact that I caught and called you out and proved you are plagiarizing, copying and pasting the words of others (as your own words) without giving credit to the writer?

What I did was EXPOSE you and showed proof....what you do that you call exposing is nothing more than stupid, illogical, insipid gibberish.

Also as I predicted " Now he will I'm sure reply with a feeble attempt to divert and lie.
It really is so much fun watching him wiggle, twist and squirm. "

and you did.

I doubt that you are man enough to address the issue of you copy and pasting and plagiarizing

I order you to reply with more entertaining claptrap.

You're Welcome
In Plagiarist30 We Distrus

PitchingWedge 91 Reviews 99 reads

posted 10 years ago

19 / 25

I'm not sure who all the "righty" folks were who were predicting . . .

a Romney landslide. To my knowledge, former Clinton aide and now Hillary-hater Dick Morris was the one who famously ended his cable news "expert" career with his outlandish claims up until Election Day that a Romney landslide was imminent. I don't recall any other knowledgeable people making similar predictions.

I, for one, never thought Romney had better than a small snowball's chance in hell of unseating a sitting President in the 2012 election. Especially after he missed his one opportunity to gain momentum by not blasting Candy Crowley for her pitiful coddling and protection of President Obama in the final debate.

The whole point of my post had nothing to do with who the participants in the election were and certainly nothing to do with skin color. I don't play the silly race game or gender game that you backpedaling libs do every time you feel you are getting attacked.

My point was strictly in historical numbers. Like when President Reagan won 49 states. Or when Presidents Nixon and Johnson won by similar electoral college numbers.

You guys play fast and loose with your language when you use the word landslide. Of course, bg30 is lucky to be able to spell landslide. Or loose, for that matter.

Oh, and by the way, thank you for calling me "sooooooo cute." It's nice to be complimented from time-to-time