Adam Schiff has been on the White House grounds all afternoon viewing documents.  Are they the same documents Nunes saw? What will he be able to say when he's done?  The plot thickens.

Only baby boomers are interested in Russian spy dramas.

So when someone comits a crime and gets caught... burn the person(s) who said "hey, they just committed a crime"... omg

What really amazes me is all the reporting about things like Nunes was at the WHITE HOUSE!!! He's colluding. When in fact, as part of his job, he's there all the time and he wasn't actually at the White House. Just on the campus. The reason is that the data he needed to view could only be seen at two places. 1. At the whistleblowers agency or 2. the White House.

What crime was committed?  Other then the unmasking.

I have no interest in rebutting the whole thing and don't have the time or energy.  So I'll just say the entirely of your last post is utter bullshit.

I read, that he looked ashen and sweaty and had no comment.

You really should wait to read what he actually said before making dumb comments. It just makes you look like a fool.  Well, a bigger fool.

Just wondering. Claimed he had it connecting Trump to Russia weeks ago. What's holding him back?

Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said Friday he still has deep concerns about the Trump administration’s handling of classified intelligence following a trip to the White House to review key documents for himself.

Dems are never going to let this go. They are going to string it on and on and on until Schumer gets Pelosi's cock out of his ass....which will be never.

I think his silence says a lot....the docs have nothing to do with Russia...must not indicate any problems with Trump supporters.....

Got a link?

I've been following the stories, and I've not heard such a report!

You and General Grant don't seem to understand the nature of Congressional investigations. Of course, you might come by that for good reason given all the leaks from the Benghazi committee investigations, and Nunes's stunts!

How could you possibly know the info "didn't come from senior White House staff?"  And that it came from a "whistle blower?" You are only pretending to know. Or wishing. There have been two names named and one is on the White House legal staff and the other on the staff of the NSC and based in one of the buildings on the White House grounds.  Saying they are not senior White House staff is a classic distinction without a difference.
Funny also about how Trump has been railing against leakers, but when they leak something you think may be beneficial you dub them a whistle blower.  Too funny.

He said he was supposedly shown exactly what Nunes was shown.  Was it circumstantial then, or only when a Dem sees it?

yes, if the info was damning to Trump I'm sure it would not be leaked

Schiff has been running around everywhere until most recently claiming he had "circumstantial" evidence confirming Trump was in cahoots with the Russians. Where is it? He's demanding Nunes show his hand. Why doesn't he show his? Is it cos his hand is empty?  

He was all over tv a few weeks back claiming he had "circumstantial evidence" of Trump's complicity with the Russians. I'd like to see it.

Oh, are you sarcastically usin the old evidence of absence defense?

Many right-wingers, and most if not all conspiracy theorists, like Trump, use it!

I believe the "circumstantial" refers to the collusion with Russians, not the recent disclosures to Nunes and now Sciff.

If the leaks where from the white house staff, why did he need to meet with the President? The next day. He originally met his source on the White House campus. (that doesn't mean at the White House) the day before he gave the press conference.

I agree with you 100% but there's plenty of real and fake circumstantial evidence. With Schiff making claims as this stage that he has "hard" evidence he should be recusing himself.  

It was that he was out all over the media popping off that he had it. Nunes does the same about the unmasking issue and he's pilloried. Go figure. 🙄

Because it made no sense.  Unless it was part of a ham-handed charade orchestrated by the White House.
As for the leaking issue, I was referring to Nunes talking about nebulous information that had been shared with him.  He didn't say who shared it and some Republicans said it was a whistle blower.  Whistle-blowers leak, hence the assumption that's what was meant.
And your conclusion that "Obama and his adminstration unmasked members of Trump's organization and "spied" on them," is completely unsubstantiated.  You have no facts.  None.

you are not on the committee, so don't hold your breath.

That said, they BOTH need to STFU and do their jobs wouldn't you say?