Politics and Religion
Given the context?
seems to be the drink of choice here lately.
http://onlineathens.com/election/2014-10-29/women-voters-likely-decide-georgia-elections
Women voters likely to decide Georgia elections, regardless of what Fox news tells women to not vote. (I can see it now when Hillary Clinton wins, our nation will go from racist to sexist)
Be afraid, be very afraid. I am a woman with a glass of wine in my hand, and voting early ballot today! LOL!
Women voters likely to decide Georgia elections, regardless of what Fox news tells women to not vote. (I can see it now when Hillary Clinton wins, our nation will go from racist to sexist)
Be afraid, be very afraid. I am a woman with a glass of wine in my hand, and voting early ballot today! LOL!
JackDunphy
posted
4 / 23
bigguy30
posted
5 / 23
bigguy30
posted
6 / 23
86H13LTP
posted
12 / 23
Might is the operative word, though I find it very unlikely, and they'd be pissed at the sexist implications that somehow they are less informed than their male counterparts. And, would you? Particularly if you were a college student, or a hard working professional who views the Republicans making it more difficult you to vote? There's a lot of hard working, intelligent young women out there. I meet them every day. So, you can speculate all you want to about how a young woman would hear what she said, in the context in which she said it, but if I were a betting man, I wouldn't bet on your speculation. I'd go with, more young women than not would be insulted, and hear it as an invite by conservatives not to vote. P.S. And, you're slicing the issue down to 'being informed' when some of the dialog was about being conservative. The older you get the more conservative you become, supposedly, and equating being conservative meaning being more informed. The whole discussion was just a big circle jerk by conservatives on the show, and you won't admit it. 
You alluded to it with your remark about high heels. If you don't want to be honest that's your prerogative. You can claim whatever point you want to, but you're not being honest if you don't stick to my point: If I bet on a young woman interpreting what was said on that show as an invite not to vote, and you bet that she took it as a challenge to be better informed and vote, I bet I would win a lot of money, and you'd lose.
But then liberal politics are rooted in dishonesty so it should surprise no one!!
You alluded to it with your remark about high heels. If you don't want to be honest that's your prerogative. You can claim whatever point you want to, but you're not being honest if you don't stick to my point: If I bet on a young woman interpreting what was said on that show as an invite not to vote, and you bet that she took it as a challenge to be better informed and vote, I bet I would win a lot of money, and you'd lose.
I chose the article to show the dishonesty of the woman's remarks. And, the conservative author, just as you didn't or won't see it! Why is that?
I chose the article to show the dishonesty of the woman's remarks. And, the conservative author, just as you didn't or won't see it! Why is that?
And, I'm so sorry that I disobeyed your imperial command regarding not voting tomorrow. Well, guess I didn't really since I voted by absentee ballot last Friday, before you told me not to!
Related Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/04/why-mitt-romneys-47-percent-c...