Some would argue that she, being president, should be held to a higher standard. The evidence I saw in the Harvard Crimson piece was quite damning. It wasn't a one off thing that could be excused by her making a mistake. She has a history of plagiarizing over years and on multiple occasions. Several were really egregious.  
I'd like to hear the argument on why she should stay but what I hear from people on my side is that this is a political hit which doesn't carry a lot of water with me. Regardless of where the info came from, the only standard should be if the accusations are true or false. Provided the info is accurate, and I believe it is, I think she should go.

She was hired because she is black, female, and a Marxist.  Not because she has any talent.

Yeah those lefties do like to plagiarize  and just like the ones here they have temper tantrums in fits of rage, deny, twist, distort  and play the victim though guilty as hell be it plagiarism  or anything else for that matter.

http://nypost.com/2023/12/20/news/claudine-gay-accused-of-40-acts-of-plagiarism-in-new-complaint/

 
http://nypost.com/2023/12/21/news/harvard-finds-more-duplicative-language-in-presidents-work/

It's being reported that diversity hire and plagiarist Gay is resigning. No doubt she will be replaced by a fellow Marxist diversity hire of mediocre scholarly accomplishments.