Write Review
1,978,762 Total Reviews 4,176 New Reviews
9,232 Users Online

Politics and Religion

Don't retreat, reload
michael_z971 3 Reviews 698 reads
posted

By making that statement, she put herself in a position where she could be associated to an incident like what happened in Arizona, even though the shooter may have never heard of her

Priapus532876 reads

Related Link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20110112/pl_politico/47477

ReplyQuoteReport
THESPORTCAPITAL2008 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
BenFranklinJournalist1187 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd1343 reads

Too bad, considering that much of what she said about the media was true. But, she really ratcheted up the rhetoric when using the term "blood libel." Most people don't know what it means, but they will soon find out, and at the minimum, wonder about her motives for using such a term, and/or see it as h er speaking to her base, since she's probably not counting on a significant percentage of Jewish voters supporting her. At the worst, people will view her as an anti-Semite. I find it hard to believe she did not know it's meaning and context before she used it.

ReplyQuoteReport
Priapus531108 reads

keep in mind that Plain is so stupid, she hires a ghostwriter to make out her shopping list. Not only doesn't she know the meaning of "blood libel" she doesn't know the meaning of the word LIBEL------------:)

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd991 reads

Giffords is Jewish? It could be. Or, on the other end of the continuum it could be a typical narcissistic response to feeling acted. The typical narcissist, when a person has felt attacked and injured by them and speaks up about it, will protest even louder and more vehemently that they are the one being truly attacked.

-- Modified on 1/12/2011 1:17:21 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
ipeesittingdown1431 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
THESPORTCAPITAL820 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Timbow1157 reads

Posted By: mattradd
Too bad, considering that much of what she said about the media was true. But, she really ratcheted up the rhetoric when using the term "blood libel." Most people don't know what it means, but they will soon find out, and at the minimum, wonder about her motives for using such a term, and/or see it as h er speaking to her base, since she's probably not counting on a significant percentage of Jewish voters supporting her. At the worst, people will view her as an anti-Semite. I find it hard to believe she did not know it's meaning and context before she used it.

ReplyQuoteReport
dncphil1239 reads

So she used a word that has emotional connotations.

How many times has the left talked about slavery.  A football player wants more money and he talks about slavery.   Al Gore told a black audience that the GOP wants to return them to the days when they were 3/4 of a person. One Dem pundit called the GOP "Krystalnacht."

For once, I won't go on and on and on and on, but there are 1,000 examples of the left with Nazi, Kristalnahct, etc.

But Palin uses "blood libel," and that does it. Almost as bad as her using bulls eyes on the ad.

ReplyQuoteReport
anonymousfun923 reads

In your case, it happens when you write too much, dnc, it is usually turns into crap. It is amazing you only get riled about right wing BS.

ReplyQuoteReport
benlanger1742 reads

She is uneducated dumbshit.

ReplyQuoteReport
michael_z971699 reads

By making that statement, she put herself in a position where she could be associated to an incident like what happened in Arizona, even though the shooter may have never heard of her

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!