Politics and Religion

Computer Forensics
impposter 49 Reviews 21 reads
posted

Rudy refused to turn over digital copies of the hard drive in question. He only turned over PRINTED copies of the emails. Rudy or the computer repair guy allegedly gave the FBI the original computer. One early report is the header info or other forensic evidence on the emails in question had time stamps that were inconsistent with the visible dates on the emails.  
.
Likewise, someone with access to the computer (such as a computer repairman), could have planted photos and other docs on the hard drive.
.
I have yet to read about corroboration that the computer was actually Hunter Biden's computer.  That should be verifiable from serial numbers, MAC address, and other info logs.

Gee!!! the way things are going, I am not so sure how Hillary Clinton and her running mate Hunter Biden can win this but I will NEVER going to give up on them ! :)

Rudy refused to turn over digital copies of the hard drive in question. He only turned over PRINTED copies of the emails. Rudy or the computer repair guy allegedly gave the FBI the original computer. One early report is the header info or other forensic evidence on the emails in question had time stamps that were inconsistent with the visible dates on the emails.  
.
Likewise, someone with access to the computer (such as a computer repairman), could have planted photos and other docs on the hard drive.
.
I have yet to read about corroboration that the computer was actually Hunter Biden's computer.  That should be verifiable from serial numbers, MAC address, and other info logs.

Serial numbers and court information on serial numbers are available.  Along with court document. There is also signatures when the laptops were dropped off at the repair shop.

Also, NO ONE who owns a Mac takes it to a local "computer repair shop." They take them to an Apple Store at the local mall. This thing has all the marks of a crude set-up.

If you know how to search you can find the documents.  They were turned over to the court in 2019.  The date of the document is 12/9/2019. The court hearing was in Wilmington, DE 12/17/2019. It was a subpoena to testify to a grand jury.

Also, FBI’s only position on this is: they are not even saying there is an investigation!
So, how do Trumpanzees and Faux news get all these FBI spiced misinformation? These have zero reliability.

"The FBI declined to confirm or deny the existence of an investigation into the laptop or the emails, as is standard practice."

‘Purported’ ? Who is purporting other than trumpanzees and FakeNews? Surely not FBI.

The more important question is why the Biden campaign hasn’t denied its Hunter’s laptop.

Surely by now, someone from the campaign, if not Joe himself, would have asked Hunter whether or not he left his laptop at the repair shop.

Politically the easiest route to take.  But that sets up a legal minefield for Hunter’s lawyers. If they know the laptop was his, they risk disbarment if they allow him to swear under oath in future proceedings (Senate inquiries, trial, grand jury) that the laptop wasn’t his.

They had the option of claiming that yes, the laptop was his, but foreign actors planted the incriminating photos and emails on the computer after he dropped it off. That course of action was shut down when the FBI, DOJ and DNI said this incident was not related to foreign (i.e. Russian) interference.

Register Now!