The SAME rightwingers were saying then that Clinton was "obessed" with Bin Laden and it was "wag the dog" when he tried to get Osama with a missle attack. Bill Clinton spend A LOT of time chasing Bin Laden.

Then Bush got in there and did NOTHING -- held ZERO meetings about terrorism even though Clinton left him a comprehensive plan and significant warnings! Bush received 52 memos telling him of potential terrorist attacks that involved Bin Ladin, Planes, Buildings, Spectacular Explosions and he did not hold a SINGLE meeting about it! Then he received the August 6th PDB warning that Osama was determined to strike...So what did Bush do then? Bush just stayed on vacation like he did with Katrina!

And they never ask Bush or his administration about any of that stuff.

I'm glad Clinton got pissed off -- I'd be pissed off too! Who would'nt get pissed off if someone tried to pin 9/11 on them with a bunch of made-up mumbo jumbo? It's bullshit.


-- Modified on 9/24/2006 10:09:34 PM

I'm sure the right wing will weigh in with their predictable rhetoric.
Nonetheless, I didn't see a ranting raving lunatic, I saw an angry man fed up with the crap he has endured from his enemies. It seemed to me that Wallace was completely caught offguard by Clinton's passion and anger. And yet, Clinton came across more direct and unambiguous than he ever would have been able to in elected office.

Footnote: He'd make a good First Lady.

an embarrassment to himself and the country, he should have enough dignity to keep his mouth shut.

blindly accept the word of that pathological lier and narcissist?

Wallace was indeed caught off guard. Too bad Clinton wasn't telling the truth, again.

Poor Bill had to actually answer a question.  He went off-tilt!  "The Clinton Legacy Reclamation Program" has taken another hit.  

He attacked Al Quaeda twice (an aspirin factory and an empty tent) during his 8 years in office.  Both within 3 months of each other.  Coincidentally, the impeachment was going on at the same time.  No attacks after the Senate cleared him and none before Lewinsky.  What a wild coincidence.  But hey, he came close (note the sarcasm).  We had the intelligence to realize we missed him by an hour but not the intelligence to find him.  Makes perfect sense.

Sorry guys.  His legacy is that of a coctail party joke and nothing else.  A truly small man prone to temper tantrums.

Clinton kicked ASS! I'm glad he took Chris Wallace down! I woulda too! Faux tried to set him up and Clinton wasn't having any of it. YEAH! He bitch-slapped the man!

You say Clinton actually had to answer a question, huh? So when exactly was Bush asked why he did not even hold a single meeting about Bin Laden? You DO care about that right? Since you are so non-biased and truly seeking the truth, right?

I actually wonder if you guys even want to know the truth. You guys always seem to rather make little jokes -- like you called Clinton's missle attack "Blood for Monica". Remember that?

Clinton came closer to getting Bin Laden than Bush ever has. Clinton ACTUALLY did something and tried hard to get him.

How hard did Bush try? Oh, well he IGNORED him and still has not gotten him. But that is totally okay with you guys, isn't it? You rightwingers must be such sad, sorry, human beings who live in some strange reality that you just make up as you go along.


-- Modified on 9/25/2006 1:40:43 PM

And they held meetings to see which campaign donors would get no-bid contracts.

Everytime there is an attack anywhere in the world, the GOP pundits are on TV gloating about how it will help them win the election since they are "tough on homeland security".

The Republicans are a party that views terrorism as a positive thing.  

The fact that Osama waited 8 months AFTER Clinton left office to attack us should tell you something.

When Clinton was attacking the terrorists, the GOP were attacking Clinton for getting a BJ.  That should tell you where their priorities lie.

The liberals are in total damage control today over that interview.  Clinton looked like a fool with his purple face and jabbing finger.  "This is a hit job!".  Poor Bill, always the victim.

They just wheeled the non-partisan Richard Ben-Veniste out on CNN to defend Clinton. Lanny Davis is on Foxnews. Some old bat is on Hardball. What's that I smell in the air over Clinton Land?  Desperation.

Dude, Liberals are so freaking proud of Clinton today, you don't have a clue do you? Either that or you are in Denial as usual.

Do you know how many people have said to me today how great they thought it was what Clinton did?

It is more of that wacked-out, wing-nut, wishful thinking just like you guys did with Iraq, Katrina, Schiavo, 9/11, Tax cuts for the ultra Rich, Torture, North Korea, bla, bla, bla...

You people live in a very strange and frieghtening reality.



-- Modified on 9/25/2006 3:04:57 PM

I'm trying to decide if the hissy fit or the temper tantrum was the best part.  Very impressive. Damage control is on.  Blame Fox News!  They actually asked an ex-president about foreign policy and he went ape shit.  How biased of them.  Don't they know how "obsessed" he was with Bin Laden?

Send me some of your shrooms.  I'll take out some old Jefferson Airplane and enjoy your reality for a little while.  The difference is I'll snap out of it.  When will you?

He spanked him pretty good -- and we LOVED IT!!! Let's see some more of it, Bill! The rightwingers go nuts when you bring up facts! They hate facts! They'd rather live in their made-up little world of wingnutia blame Clinton for everything. They can't admit that the country and the world were so much better off during the Clinton years. They can't take it! It makes them crazy! Let's give 'em some more of it, Billy. You can take it to them like no other Democrate and it makes the even more nuts than they already are! Keep it comin, Billy boy, keep it comin' -- WE LOVE IT!!

absolutely right, and it's about time someone tells the truth about what went down. Too bad you right wingers made such a big deal about "the tail wagging the dog" when Good Ol Bill was trying to kill OBL .  It's make it tuff for you to deny now !

absolutely right, and it's about time someone tells the truth about what went down. Too bad you right wingers made such a big deal about "the tail wagging the dog" when Good OL Bill was trying to kill OBL .  It's make it tuff for you to deny now !

neener neener neener you right wing bloviating hot air gas bags!

I loved what Clinton did. All the Dems should do more of it.

my third statement of EIGHT words = RANT?

rant -
– verb 1. to speak or declaim extravagantly or violently; talk in a wild or vehement way; rave: e.g.The demagogue ranted for hours.

Get real please.

BTW, Clinton's statements WERE full of untruths.

my rant-o-meter shows them sucking a total of about 30" of vacuum.

Typically, accusations and attacks are reserved until after one makes a point, but in your original post, (right below stam's thread starter), you attempt to repudiate any response before it's made. Tsk tsk.

And my responses were far from venomous rants.

If you want a longer response with something to actually sink your teeth into...

Maybe you can out to me exactly where Clintons supposed "untruths" are? Below are excerpts directly from the 9/11 report. It looks to be like he was telling the truth:

Page 197 (paperback edition- Chapter "Threat To Threat, Sec. 6.3 Attack on the Uss Cole"):

"As the Clinton administration drew to a close, Clarke and his staff developed a policy paper of their own, the first such comprehensive effort since the Delenda plan of 1998. The resulting paper, entitled "Strategy for Eliminating the Threat from of Al Qaeda: Status and Prospects" reviewed the threat and record to date, incorporated the CIA's new ideas from the Blue Sky memo, and posed several near-term policy options".

-snip-

page 200

Rice made an initial decision to hold over both Clarke and his entire counter terrorism staff... She decided also that Clarke should retain title of national counter terrorism coordinator, though he would no longer be a de facto member of the Principals Committee on the issues.

page 201

"Within the first few days after Bush's inauguration, Clarke approached Rice in an effort to get her- and the new President- to give terrorism very high priority and to act on the agenda that he had pushed during the last few months of the previous administration. After Rice requested that all senior staff identify desirable major policy reviews or initiatives, Clarke submitted an elaborate memorandum on January 25, 2001. He attached his 1998 Dlenda Plan and the December 2000 strategy paper. "We urgently need... a Principals level review on the Al Qaeda network", Clarke wrote."

You can search the report for yourself right here:
www.9-11commission.gov