Mueller fills his team full of anti-Trumpers, pro-Hillary types, who then are caught mocking Trump bts and he really expects the American people are supposed to think this is a fair and impartial investigation?

anti-Trumpers, pro-Hillary types. How ridiculously disingenuous.

which when coupled with the texts gets even more interesting given the edits were partly done by Strzok and also someone in the FBI Legal office (Page?)

A Fox News crony ripping Mueller.  

Really, Plants? Remember when your side use to care about small details like "facts?":

This investigation is now becoming a farce. You can tell how scared the congressional Dems are becoming because they have very recently started to move off talking about "collusion" and moved onto "obstruction."

Dershowitz and Sean lick each other's balls..

Maybe you and duane should get a room.

Who is a relentless self-promoting douchebag.

As opposed to you licking Obammy's Chocolate Salty Balls?

If they're OK with TEAM Mueller, then who give's fuck what Dershowitz says on, of course when he says it on Fox. I'm for letting the process take it's course....But don't get nervous, congress won't impeach trump. He'll get bruised but he'll finish his term...So relax now,chill.
And my guess is that you think this investigation is partisan against trump, don't you? And Roy Moore never went after 1 4-16 yo's, huh?
And wasn't everyone mocking trump. I know trump supporters that will admit, "Yeah, he's a idiot, but he's our idiot".

Obstruction is a crime? Really, then Mueller should have plenty of proof. but alas, all he has is bills bills bills that he hands to his democratic buddies to pay.  

made me laugh .  

The FACTS and just the FACTS, will stand on their own merit, regardless of who uncovers those FACTS or their political beliefs.  If they do not, then a judge in a court of law, or the congress responsible for impeaching a president if he is so deserving, will do NOTHING if the FACTS are NOT actionable.

Zero? Got a link?

"The number who donated to McCain, Romney or Trump?
 
 
Zero."

Or smoking with Madison?  

Is that public knowledge? If it is, why don't we know about Trump's donations? Sorry if I don't take his word for it.

But I can see how an ignorant Trumptard would try to spin it that way.  All Dersh does is repeat a very common standard that it’s not just being impartial, it’s the appearance of impartiality.  Mueller immediately fired the agent months ago, so there really is nothing going on here.

Trump flatly denied last night any plans on firing Mueller.

I am sure you remember the really juicy ones like, Trump will drop out after the first debate, Trump will drop out after Iowa, Trump will drop out before the Convention , Trump really doesn't want to be POTUS and Mike Pence will be the REAL POTUS. Trump will only be a figure head and Steve Bannon will be the REAL power in the White House. The list goes on and on and on, and none of them turned out to be true.

If you have info that rebuts him, please provide it.

Why did he withhold that? Congress has oversight and he kept them in the dark for months. If everything is on the up and up, why conceal that info?

spouting off!

-- Modified on 12/18/2017 12:17:06 PM

If you do not have one, you have no idea what he has or doesn't have!

So were you doing solitary confinement glued to Fox with your eyes prop open?  You quoted...."Congress has oversight and he kept them in the dark for months"...Now would you trust congress with that weasel Devin Nunes chairing that committee? Nunes has been known to sneak around the back door of the WH leaking intel to trump. Mueller is smart to only tell what HE feels that they might want to know. He SHOULDN'T show his hand to that ship of fools.
And I don't think he's bind to tell them anything, except his final report.

...Since when DUANE does anything Trump says have anything to do what he actually does, he is a master at lying & deception.

since when MRHUCK do I care about your opinion?

Wrong on two counts.  First congress does not have oversight on the Independent Counsel.  He reports only to the Deputy Director.  Second, he is independent in the administration of his incestigation and is under no obligation to report anything concerning who he hires and fires.

He is NOT an independent counsel as he IS a "special" counsel so you clearly have no clue.

Technically Mueller is an “Independent Prosecuter” under Federal law.  He is not appointed by Congress and Congress has not right of oversight.   If congress wanted to appoint an independent counsel it would have to enact a measure that is then signed into law by the President.

has “oversight” responsibility for the Department of Justice and the special counsel regs even require the AG to make notifications to the committee on certain issues regarding the special counsel.  

The terms special prosecutor, independent prosecutor and independent counsel are all synonymous.  Meuller is not actually in the Justcie Department.  Thats the whole point of the special prosecutor - an outside lawyer who is not put in the position of investigating his own boss - in this case Trump and Jeff Sessions.

to fire Mueller at this point, although he can. The investigation is crumbling and has not produced any evidence to Trump Russian collusion. Clearly and it is a bias witch hunt. Like many times before, Trump will come out of this unscathed.

Also you choose to stay in denial about Russia too.

-- Modified on 12/20/2017 3:28:29 PM

"If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell."

blatantly bias. It's safe to say that any evidence of trump Russian collusion would have been revealed months ago. They have know evidence of trump Russian collusion. Trump is more likely to be charged with grabbing someone's pussy than russian collusion.

Happy you and other Trump cult members are in serious denial.
The more you respond, you keep proving that point.

anyone on his campaign, transition team or White House staff. He's already paranoid against anything that may be viewed as delegitimizing his presidency. That's where Mueller may get him for obstruction of justice; his attempts to prevent such evidence coming to light.

Even if evidence collected by the special counsel does not support a pick from "menu A" or "menu B," there could be more, much, much more.  Lest not we forget that Clinton's impeachment proceedings began with a sexual harassment law suit filed by Paula Jones' attorneys.  Something Clinton tried to forestall until after his term as president was up.

Maybe rumors, who can really tell?  Or maybe they were true and we both know how often Trump changes his mind!  His behavior has definitely proven to be just that erratic!

true here?  Why does it matter?  Do you really believe the republican congress would find half-truths or poorly substantiated facts, actionable?  Do you truly believe the republican congress would impeach Trump if the information they were provided was biased in any way?

I read your post four times and still can not figure it out.  Were you trying to make a point?  Care to elaborate?

Am guessing you are referring to those democratic members of the senate and house investigative panels?