Politics and Religion

Bianco
bond007 31 Reviews 619 reads
posted
1 / 43

The UFC fight at the White House disgraced this country.  There is no other way to say it.  Anybody disagree?

inicky46 61 Reviews 29 reads
posted
2 / 43

Gold toilets, putting his name on money, gold ornaments in the Oval Office and on and on and on.
And now, cage wrestling on the White House lawn.
Everything Trump touches dies.

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 19 reads
posted
3 / 43

After hearing that fighter make that derogatory comment about Michelle Obama, I wasn't surprised. And the WH silent on this..again not surprising.
But that POS Dana White, calling the comments "nonsense" but he stands on free speech, that's a crock.
When asked why he was holding this fight on the WH Lawn, his answer was to spread the sport...yeah, he's looking for more Red Necks, and if you're a racist...then this is the sport for you.
Can you Imagine Jalen Brunson calling Melania Trump a hooker

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 25 reads
posted
4 / 43

when asked about this comment said that he "Didn't love it," but as you say, he's a hard-core free-speech guy, not about restricting speech like the Dems.  I didn't think it was so bad, because it's not news.  Many people have been speculating about this for years.  Since Barry is big on being pegged, it makes a certain amount of sense.  Some people say there is a photo somewhere on the internet where Michelle was sitting on a chair in a skirt with her legs slightly open and it looked like she had a dick.  I haven't been able to find it, so I have no idea.  Even if it did look like a dick, it could have been a strap-on so she would be ready anytime Barry begs her for a good pounding.  

Readytorock1 44 Reviews 26 reads
posted
5 / 43

I was there to witness it. One of the best displays of patriotisim Ive ever seen. The American underdog victory in the main event was...chefs kiss.

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 23 reads
posted
6 / 43

And through all your conspiracy beliefs you “ haven't been able to find it” anything you claim is out there
I had you peg as a FOX follower, do I need to add that you’re into the depth of QAnon now?

Readytorock1 44 Reviews 27 reads
posted
7 / 43

Dont play coy now pal. You pull the same shit.  

"Bianco is a racist"  

"How?"

"Well, he just is"

Youve NOT ONCE been able to back up your statements with any semblence of fact. Yet here you are trying to tell someone else about conspiracy. Hypocritical much?

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 18 reads
posted
8 / 43

Your dude got SMOKED..🤣🤣
And post where I said “Bianco is a racist” flat out.
All I said was, because you’re a black gay man, and he wouldn’t piss on you if you were on fire.
And him losing so badly, the people who voted against him did you a favor
You’re welcome 😂

crsm27 32 Reviews 22 reads
posted
9 / 43

SO..... you are against FREE SPEECH?   That is what is sounds like.

 
How about MLB players getting in trouble for putting bible verses on their pride hats?    Or like I have mentioned before, people kneeling during the national anthem?       How come you are "OK" with one but not others.

 
Now my stance on this is if it is COMPANY TIME and you go against what the company wants.   You are in trouble.    The issue with UFC fighters..... is that they are technically "independent contractors".    So their brand is themselves.   Not so much a "team" type thing.   Yes this guy could lose endorsements and possibly get his UFC contract pulled.   But Dana White stated he is for freedom of speech.    So there it is.    ALSO Dana didn't pull anyone contract that has spoken out against Trump..... so he is for freedom of speech.

 
White made his comment on it and you are pissed?    WTF.   He called it nonsense.   What more do you want him to do?

 
Also WHY should the President/Administration make a comment on this?   Serious question?   Do they need to make a comment when anyone makes a comment like this?    

 
You pissed that Brunson didn't get pissed when Trump showed up to the game.   WHICH WAS THE FIRST TIME A PRESIDENT HAS EVER SHOWED UP TO AN NBA FINALS.     Just curious if that is why you brought him up.

 
The comment made about M. Obama was bullshit and a stunt by that fighter.....period.   But you trying to make more of it than what it actually is.     White had the perfect response but libs just get their panties in a bunch over nothing.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 18 reads
posted
10 / 43

You always jump to an illogical conclusion especially when it comes to our first amendment right of free speech.  I'm not against free speech. But I am against racism and I oppose any individual who uses his right of free speech to spread hate. Your right to free speech doesn't mean I can't despise what you are saying.  Condemning what you are saying is not condemning your right to say it. Can you get that concept through your thick skull once and for all?  Somehow I doubt it.

crsm27 32 Reviews 19 reads
posted
11 / 43

How is that "RACIST".... please explain to me how calling someone a "man" is racist.

 

This shows again how LIBERALS want to make it about race when it wasn't at all.    You also might not know about the fighter who said it.   He has been linked to many "stupid" antics.   He "acted" like he threw up on himself at a weigh in, he has stated other stupid comments..... all for his "persona".    But yeah....let fucking facts escape you.    Then you go off on Dana White who spoke out against what that fighter said..... immediately.      

 
I totally understand with what you say about Free Speech.....and I agree with it.    BUT the typical Liberal wants this guy to be chastised and have his career ended over this comment.   YOU wanted more from Dana White.....when he did what you are saying you are for.   He didn't agree with the comment and said it was STUPID..... but people have free speech.    But some how you called DANA's reaction wrong..... or cowardly.   SEE YOU ARE NOT FOLLOWING WHAT YOU JUST PREACHED ABOVE.    But again.... this might be over your head.  Since liberals are the founders of cancel culture.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 14 reads
posted
12 / 43

Every time when I think you have posted the stupidest thing I've ever read, you outdo yourself.  

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 22 reads
posted
13 / 43

What that fighter said...I see it as slanderous. And with that, he put the UFC,and Dana White is a compromising situation financially and open for legislation. I doubt she'll sue but Melania Trump has sued for less so if it was the other way around...maybe
And really, you're bringing up MLB Players writing bible shit on hats, and NFL players kneeling down...you're comparing that to the UFC situation? Remember, its one person slandering another person. and that person being a black woman one time first lady. MLB players writing shit is hurting who? Is it slander and to who or what? And the whole MLB, NFL doesn't mean shit to me, couldn't care less
And that POS Dana should have done more, maybe suspend the guy for a few months, or fine him.There's alot Dana White could do, the fighters are unionized so he can to more if he chooses.
But, let's be honest, this is what the UFC fan base is all about. It's a Red Neck Sport, sprinkled in with racism.
Jalen Brunson? I use it as an example...but its you going all over the place.

Readytorock1 44 Reviews 23 reads
posted
14 / 43

You can see it as slander all you want. Shes a public figure and there isnt shit she can do about it. Unless, there isnt a falsity to what he said, then there could be slander. Was it tasteless? Sure. Slander? Not unless those rumors about ol Big Mike are indeed true. See how that works?  

The fighters are NOT unionized. Never have been.  

So, no slander. No union. Sounds like once again, you dont know wtf you are talking about.  

Ufc is the most diverse sport in the world. One of the biggest champs is openly gay. Youre view on this sport is one that hasnt changed from 30+ years ago.

Readytorock1 44 Reviews 21 reads
posted
15 / 43

Or course im still on this. It was a pivot point on here because this is when we all found out you were full of shit. So yeah, im gonna keep on harping about that until you prove me wrong. You still cant explain what you meant lmao.  

Bianco did better than your gal Katie. So CA isnt completely retarded. But we are collectively too retarded to get a good sheriff for Gov.

Readytorock1 44 Reviews 29 reads
posted
16 / 43

Youre asking a retard to explain something. Just think about that for a moment

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 19 reads
posted
17 / 43

He asked you to explain how calling someone a man is racist, and you couldn't do it.  You could have said it was sexist, which is closer, but still not spot on.  

 
For centuries, individual combat like this for the entertainment and amusement of spectators was a favorite of Royalty, Aristocrats, and the masses alike, as it was often "to the death."  Now, YOU declare that it's racist and only fit for Red Necks to watch.  Explain how you came up with THAT conclusion.  You probably don't like it because it's too brutal for your delicate sensibilities and offends you softer, feminine side.  Not surprised AT ALL.  

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 26 reads
posted
18 / 43

And the winner is ..😂😂😂

Readytorock1 44 Reviews 26 reads
posted
19 / 43

Hell of a rebuttal. Ill take that as a "yes sir, i dont know shit about what im jammering on about".  

I see you are simply out of your league when it comes to going back and forth about most topics. The ones that think they know it all usually are.

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 23 reads
posted
20 / 43

You know Bianco got SMOKED in his own backyard.,,he actually lost in Riverside County to… drum roll please … Becerra !!!
I’ll let you figure out the reason why .,😂😂😂
And you’re still welcome 🙏

Readytorock1 44 Reviews 25 reads
posted
21 / 43

Since you claim you reside in CA, it should be worrisome that Becerra is even in the running for Gov, yet here you are gloating about it.  

Retards like you is why this state isnt what it could be.

crsm27 32 Reviews 17 reads
posted
22 / 43

So can't REFUTE what I said or explain how calling someone a "MAN" is "racist"..... you resort to name calling.

 
YOU ARE A TYPICAL LIBERAL HACK.

 
Again.... please explain how calling someone a "man" is racist????   We will wait.

crsm27 32 Reviews 21 reads
posted
23 / 43
coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 17 reads
posted
24 / 43

a Leftie and believe that men are second class citizens in accordance with how we were all denigrated for being men under the Biden Administration.  However, since it's not a legally available form of slander per se, you can only make a case for slander if you can show actual damages occurred as a direct result of what was said.  

crsm27 32 Reviews 23 reads
posted
25 / 43

He moved the goal posts....he cried "RACIST".... now it is "SLANDER"..... but like mentioned for it to be "slander" it needs to show actual damages or threats based on what this fighter said.

 
Otherwise every comic out there that has made a "joke" could be brought up on slander.

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 22 reads
posted
26 / 43

What’s the difference?
It can be done …no?

crsm27 32 Reviews 22 reads
posted
27 / 43

IT IS ALL FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!!!   MLB Players have a right to freedom of speech.... NLF players taking a knee have a right to freedom of speech.... CORRECT!!!!   Yet you want the whole world to burn the UFC Guy at the stake.  

But like I mentioned if you are on company time (TEAM) you should face consequences if the team see fit.  That is my personal belief.  Since people who are at a JOB get fired for things they say while on the clock....even off the clock.    

 
But what do you think about the others sports I bring up and freedom of speech?  Should they be allowed to do those things or not without facing retribution or punishment?   If you say YES.... then you are a fucking hypocrite.    You can say what the UFC guy said was idiotic, wrong, and you disagree with it.    But you now want others to punish him.... which is hypocritical to freedom of speech that you say you are for.    But again.... this fucking escapes you.

inicky46 61 Reviews 22 reads
posted
28 / 43
Hpygolky 233 Reviews 22 reads
posted
29 / 43
Readytorock1 44 Reviews 20 reads
posted
30 / 43

Its the only way these tards can pretend to hang in there. They need the handicap or its game over after the first rebuttal.

crsm27 32 Reviews 28 reads
posted
31 / 43

HOW ABOUT STAY ON FUCKING TOPIC.....   but yeah... .libs cant do that when beaten by FACTS.

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 26 reads
posted
32 / 43

Playing board monitor...You're not following the bouncing ball...FACT, HACK!

crsm27 32 Reviews 24 reads
posted
33 / 43

Am I "playing" board monitor or just showing how fucking hypicritical you and others are on this site, move goal posts, etc.

 
You just can't take being called out.    GOT IT

cks175 51 Reviews 29 reads
posted
35 / 43

that you’re a very weak debater and got called out on it.

inicky46 61 Reviews 19 reads
posted
37 / 43

as a Partisan Hack on a fuck board.
He doesn't seem to care.

cks175 51 Reviews 25 reads
posted
38 / 43

Sorry Nicky, and old man projecting his hackery onto others does not get credit for being a call out. The truth of the matter is that I contribute more intelligent and reasonable content here than just about anyone that participates in this forum.

inicky46 61 Reviews 16 reads
posted
39 / 43

This is hilarious because he's been ridiculed continually for calling himself "intelligent and reasonable."
Despite the fact that he's one of the biggest partisan hacks around.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 24 reads
posted
40 / 43

you reach a certain level of public fame.  You can get away with more slandering of someone who is famous than you can someone who is just a regular working person, but if they can prove they were damaged and that you KNEW what you said was false, or that you had no reasonable basis to believe it was true at the time you said it, the recovery from a lawsuit can be huge.  That's how Trump cashed in on CBS's bullshit reporting.  

inicky46 61 Reviews 24 reads
posted
41 / 43

Meaning you either knew a statement you made about a celebrity was false or acted with "reckless disregard" for whether it was true or not. But that's NOT how Trump "cashed in" on his CBS suit. CBS was being acquired and knew Trump could screw up Federal approval, so it simply caved on a suit that was so weak the "actual malice" threshold was never tested. If it had been taken to court, CBS would probably have won, as it did in the Westmoreland case in the '80s.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 21 reads
posted
42 / 43

an insurance policy premium.  You are paying to protect yourself from the possibility of a catastrophic judgment for many times the settlement you paid to end the litigation.  

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 25 reads
posted
43 / 43

Trump isn't getting one obsolete penny from the settlement.  All the money is going to the Trump Presidential Library.  Of course, Trump could "cash in" by stealing the money from the library, which would be par for the course for him.  

 
CDL - don't you ever get tired of being a fucking moron?

Register Now!