Facebook and Zuckerberg are not progressives. They are fence sitters. They refuse to pick a side. They have met with and worked with both parties. They have donated to both, though slightly more to Republicans. I would say the more is nominal though. You try too hard.
UK police commissioner threatens to extradite, jail US citizens over online posts: 'We'll come after you'
.
This is what Walz has in mind with his plans to criminalize "misinformation."
.
It's the dream of every progressive to control speech and thought.
.
UK is already sentencing online posters with 2 years in prison for wrong speak.
.
Progressives want that for us her in America..
.
Walz and Kamala will try to make it happen -- to the best of their abilities.
He's suffering from mental whiplash resulting from believing Trump was a lock to having that snatched away from him.
So sad.
He's suffering from mental whiplash resulting from believing Trump was a lock to having that snatched away from him.
So sad.
If you could you would have the lot of us on the right kicked off here… if you could!
Trump hasn’t had anything snatched away. 🙄🙄🙄
Keep believing that BS though.
The only time Lester was ever "spot on" was when he had the measles. It's too cumbersome for Lester to provide a link but not too cumbersome for Lester to lie his fucking ass off. And of course, LostSon his co-SPOAT believes Lester.
Charlie Kirk posed a two year old statement by Walz. Lester lied his fucking ass off and changed it to say Walz has "PLANS to criminalize 'misinformation.'"
If LostSon thinks Lester was "spot on" about Walz's "PLANS to criminalize "misinformation," he'll provide a link backing up Lester's fucking lie. O/W he'll remain co-SPOAT as befits someone who works a a Black job.
In fact, I actually enjoy watching him lie his ass off and make a fool of himself.
Semper Lie.
.
I think Walz was also referring to post-election misinformation such as "I saw an election worker dump 1000s of ballots for my preferred candidate into a dumpster behind the supermarket." or "Italian satellites were used to change the vote count in the places where my preferred candidate lost. I have proof!"
.
If people DO have proof that the voting site HAS been moved or that ballots HAVE been changed then they will present it and show that it was NOT misinformation and not be charged.
.
There have already been some cases prosecuted for those sorts of activities but I don't know which laws were applied. Probably existing "election interference" or related laws and NOT any sort of "criminal misinformation" statute.
.
I don't think Walz was talking about candidates lying to the press or in their ads with campaign misinformation such as, "Obama was born in Kenya!" or "Kamabla drinks the blood of babies!" or "I was with Willie Brown in a helicopter that nearly crashed. He told me things about Kamabla." or "Joan Rivers told me she voted for me." (Must have been from her grave since she died in 2014.)
You will be arrested in the UK now if you are found to be observing protests. This is a Progressive's fondest dream -- total control.
Progressives have historically been much more pro protesting than conservatives. Conservatives by a mile are much more interested in control. You’re a joke if you think otherwise. I mean christ, they want to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body. Get a better argument.
SOURCE??????????
.
http://www.hrw.org/news/2024/05/29/uk-court-rules-anti-protest-measures-unlawful
UK Court Rules Anti-Protest Measures Unlawful [May 29, 2024]
You will be arrested in the UK now if you are found to be observing protests. This is a Progressive's fondest dream -- total control.
Richard Dawkins was just removed from Facebook after posting that males should not fight females in the Olympics. Progressives love to censor. They hate freedom of speech.
Facebook and Zuckerberg are not progressives. They are fence sitters. They refuse to pick a side. They have met with and worked with both parties. They have donated to both, though slightly more to Republicans. I would say the more is nominal though. You try too hard.
It’s absurd to suggest that Facebook and Zuckerberg “plays it down the middle”. They are a left leaning corporation that has worked with the government to censor citizens.
They censor for profit, not because they gaf. If they think it will hurt their brand, then they care. If they were actually taking a side there is no way they would have donated more money to Republicans than Democrats. Though as I previously stated, it’s not more by much because they donate to both. Zuckerberg just cares about his pockets. I’m not saying all of Facebook is in middle because I am sure within their ranks they have both, which explains conflicting interests.
Royal College of Nursing updated its guidance, so that patients can be denied treatment if they are perceived to have been racist.
.
This is progressivism. It's coming here and fast.
If anyone is interested in the real story behind lester's misrepresentation:
http://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/nurses-can-refuse-to-treat-racist-patients-says-streeting-07-08-2024/
"... The UK health and social care secretary has said he was “appalled” by recent attacks on Filipino nurses during far-right riots and added that clinicians could – and should – turn away abusive patients. ..."
Royal College of Nursing updated its guidance, so that patients can be denied treatment if they are perceived to have been racist.
.
This is progressivism. It's coming here and fast.