Politics and Religion

Argle Bargle!
talulajones69 See my TER Reviews 3194 reads
posted
1 / 14

I KNEW YOU WOULD APPRECIATE THIS,
Like no one else ;)

I was chatting, with one'' a'' like minded
''Thinker'' - and he put this Idea in my head-
I just have to run by you- He suggested we examine America's ''get fit'' and weight loss obsession- In a way that suggested he thought the gobernment, WAS TRYING TO PROGRAM US TO STARVE our self-
Im thinking about believeing him, if they can make us starve our self, THEY DONT HAVE TO DO IT-with codex alimenterious- (WHICH IS REAL, LOOK IT UP)-LoL :)

-
THE SHIT I BELIEVE IS REAL :(
You'll see Daddy, I promise xoxo

talulajones69 See my TER Reviews 1198 reads
posted
2 / 14
Morble_Whoosh 1094 reads
posted
3 / 14


END OF MESSAGE

talulajones69 See my TER Reviews 1262 reads
posted
4 / 14

bet you cant say that..
With me in your mouth -

RightwingUnderground 1203 reads
posted
5 / 14

We have no plans to relinquish control of our military to the U.N. nor have the FDA and USDA merged into the WHO. Some things classified presently as food additives can be dangerous and probably should be brought under control of the FDA. At the same time, the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies have too much control. Or at least it’s safe to say that their processes and procedures are messed up. I’ll even say something that will make Charlie raise an eyebrow and say the drug research, testing, and approval process does not have the citizenry’s best interest at the very top of the priority list.

About a plan to have us starve ourselves? I don’t get the connection between the above food and drug regulations with society’s push to get people to control their weight and preventative health aspects. Is the government leaning toward more control and restriction of personal freedoms regarding health? Certainly. Where’s the vast majority of the measures coming from? The liberals, those very same people that claim to want to protect personal choice such as abortion. It’s not coming from the conservatives who are blamed for all the other personal intrusions when you are in the bedroom.

There are already financial incentives to not be fat. Life insurance costs more. Some health insurance costs more. Regardless what people say, it’s harder to get a job if you’re fat, darn near impossible if you’re obese and impossible for the very morbidly obese.

Certainly fat people that live a long time inflict a higher financial burden on the health insurance and delivery system. But what is the total impact when those that die prematurely is factored in? First, everyone’s going to die from something. The end of life health costs are the largest percentage for most people. So if a large enough percentage of fat people “drop dead” prematurely, it can actually have a positive financial impact on society. The ideal financial model would be a person works and is productive most of his life, then gets fat and dies of a heart attack quickly at age 65. He therefore imposes no burden during those years when he’s unproductive anyway. People getting fat and dying prematurely actually can be beneficial to society.

charlie445 3 Reviews 1489 reads
posted
6 / 14
talulajones69 See my TER Reviews 3379 reads
posted
8 / 14

OMG!!! Did you agree with me, on EVERYTHING BUT THE ''GET FIT''- which wasnt even my idea-
So I wasnt believeing it- I just had to pull your leg..WOW- YouR checking my stuff up!!!


IM IN LOVE!!!!
Good morning RWU!!!! HAVE A WONDERFULL DAY

talulajones69 See my TER Reviews 3158 reads
posted
9 / 14

And please RWU, Look back into codex alimenterious one mre time- Look and see in december 09 nutrients and vitamins goes on the
toxin list-  If you can prove me wrong- Ill start sleping better- But I do doubt you will be able to-

I never said the UN had any plans for our miltary- I just said kenedy signed our milatary to the UN

mattradd 40 Reviews 1670 reads
posted
12 / 14
talulajones69 See my TER Reviews 3237 reads
posted
13 / 14
jerseyflyer 20 Reviews 1332 reads
posted
14 / 14

"We have no plans to relinquish control of our military to the U.N."

On 10 October, 1995, Schweinfurt, Germany, at 0900 hrs, 550 troops of the 1/15 Battalion, 3rd Infantry Division, US Army, assembled in formation, under the command of a Finnish Army General. The troops were bound for Macedonia as part of a U.N. peacekeeping force. They were wearing the blue beret and patch uniform, except for one. Spc4 Michael New, a combat medic, was wearing his GI issued uniform, with beret to match, refusing to wear the U.N. uniform. He said he swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the United Nations. President Clinton had relinquished control of these troops to the U.N. For this disobedient act of refusing an order to wear the U.N uniform, Spc4 New was court martialed. A hero in my eyes....and a man of conviction. His case went all the way to the US Supreme court.

-- Modified on 3/19/2009 10:21:47 PM

Register Now!