“Today I did what I have done my entire career, which is take seriously the oath I have taken many times to support and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Harris said, adding that “today, America’s democracy stood.”
Kamala Harris after certifying the election of Donald J. Trump.
"Former Vice President Mike Pence, who received death threats four years ago when he presided over the certification of the 2020 election, praised the “return of order and civility” to that process. In a post on social media, he called Vice President Kamala Harris “particularly admirable” for presiding over the certification of an election she lost."
Let the cheap-assed pot-shots commence, as the righties show us how small they are....

Somebody else wrote it.  Where is the word-salad that is her hallmark?  Do you really believe she would have said this if she was not going to run for Governor of CA in two years?   She's still serving up the Koolaid to the unsuspecting.  You are way too smart to let her dupe you.  

I listened to her all during the campaign and heard very little word salad. Especially compared to The Donald.
Here's what he had to say about child care policies:
Q. If elected, what specific legislation would Donald Trump seek to pass to lower childcare costs in America? Trump was asked this question at an Economic Club of New York event on Thursday. Here is his response, word for word:

to say Trump is the same as Kamala when it comes to speaking extemporaneously without a teleprompter?  That's about as disingenuous as it comes, don't you think?  Lol

I can find dozens of examples. And I never said Harris NEVER used word salad. Just less than Trump.
Now take the last word if you must and we'll crown you "SPOAT Jr."

He also wastes his time with his laundry list of links. None of which I opened.

America will never start any precedence of putting white presidents  in jail. All America's  presidents are criminals and war criminals.

And the poor dolt must have spent HOURS compiling them all. I can understand his deep disappointment.
He should just focus on not writing word salad.

He obviously didn't watch ANY video of Harris making the statement I quoted. I watched it.
She wasn't reading from a teleprompter.
She wasn't reading from a script.
She was speaking extemporaneously.
Semper Lie.

ok here’s the deal  
 You are correct, She wasn't reading from a teleprompter.  
 She was reading from a script. The one they had to pound into her dumb ass for hours before hand.  
As for “She was speaking extemporaneously”
The fuck she was 🤣🙄🤣  if you believe that I have some beach front property in New York for sale… may a bridge or two as well.

and I can find hundreds of Kamala, so what is your point?  

I thought Trump's response to "How can ... **TRADE POLICY** and **NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY** ... be coordinated?" Did Trump answer the Q? No. Trump didn't even understand the Q.  
.
He blathered on for 8 minutes about "Uncle John," "Covid," "Little Rocket Man," and other standard Trump phrases (but nothing about Hannibal Lecter in this speech) and NEVER ANSWERED THE Q!
.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/transcript-of-trumps-rambling-non-answer-to-another-q-448959
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/re-well-this-does-seem-rather-long-----449155
.
Covfefe! They took over the airports and rammed the ramparts! Trump claims that Lee said "Never fight uphill, me boys, never fight uphill." at the Battle of Gettysburg.

so immediately after Looooooser admits he was wrong about the teleprompter, he falls back on accusing Harris of having MEMORIZED her statement. Oh, the HORROR!!!!
Whereas Trump can't memorize anything.
Come on....
PS: Looooser can't even get his expressions right. "beach front property" is generally used to describe and area FAR from the beach. As in the mocking saying "I have a beach front property in Kansas to sell you." And last time I looked there is LOTS of beach front property in New York. It's called Long Island, dimwit.
Can't you get anything right? (That's a rhetorical question, if you even know what that means.)

is not going to make them go away or change Kamala's history of idiocy when speaking.  I feel bad that this is such a bad reminder for you that you can't even look at them.  I'm looking forward to her run in California so I can get more of this nightly entertainment.  It's fun for the entire family and teaches the little ones not to open their mouths until they have something intelligent to say, because Kamala's endless examples is what happens when you try to speak about things you have no knowledge of.  

stolen in California by Democrats through manipulation of the counting process.  They just kept going for weeks until they had harvested enough ballots from voters who did not vote by election day to unseat the Republican incumbent.  When a registered voter does not vote, their names and addressed can be requested for that district and Democrat operatives will take a ballot out to their home, fill it out for them, and pressure them to sign the envelope.  Totally crooked, and this las was passed by the Democrat supermajority to specifically allow this targeting of Republican incumbents in close districts.

Trump got less than 50% of the popular vote and his margin in that category was a historically low 1.5%.
Not exactly a mandate.
If barely more than 120,000 votes in a handful of swing states had swung the other way he'd have lost the Electoral College as well.

Congressional Representatives I'm talking about?  You're from California.  If you don't know because you weren't paying attention, look it up.  It was three of the last four races to be called, two weeks after election day. 90% of the votes that were tallied AFTER election day were for Dems after it was a virtual 51-49 in favor of the incumbent Republican on election night.  If this wasn't malfeasance, then it has to be the biggest coincidence in the history of politics. You should not be so naive.  You're a smart guy.

like a duck, etc.  I think you know the rest.  You should answer my question about whether the fact that the late votes came in 90% for Dems for ALL three of the Dems running against these incumbents was pure coincidence?  Obviously, you won't answer because 1) you know it's not a coincidence, and 2) how dumb it would make you look to say it is pure coincidence.  

Can you provide a link to the law in question? I would like to read it.  
.
Does it preclude Rep "operatives" from seeking out non-yet-voting Reps or does it only allow for Dem voters to be sought out by other Dems? Is that what you meant by crooked? Are the not-yet-voters identified by party affiliation or not?
.
On a nationwide balance, Rep gerrymandered states have swung 25 or more House seats from Dem to Rep.

to ALLOW the ability to use malfeasance.  It uses the ballot harvesting law to accomplish this.  Yes, the non-voters are identified by their party registration, so it makes them (especially the elderly) easy targets for a pressure campaign to allow someone else to turn in their ballot.  Do you really think our Democrat supermajority would pass a law that helps Republicans?  We are getting an education in California of how devastating one-party rule can be over several decades.  

Biden beat Trump by in 2020.  The greater victory margin for Trump is what made it more difficult for Dems to stuff the ballot box this time.  Dems were unprepared for Trump to do so well and were too late to run off enough ballots to make a difference, so they let it go.  Kamala was lying her ass off about being ahead in the polls, and that's why there was not much effort to do what they did in 2020.  

So ANY operatives, Rep or Dem, can target ANY not-yet-voter and "target [them] for a pressure campaign to allow someone else [Rep or Dem] to turn their ballot." ???  
.
I would like to read the law. Please provide a link or more detail (law name or law number, etc.).

Now he's merely saying Trump's margin was merely "still more than Biden beat Trump by in 2020." So I accept your surrender on that. Now tell us how you "know" the Dems were "unprepared for Trump to do so well...so they let it go?" Another in a long line of your unsupported assertions on this page.
But WAIT!!! There's one more!!!
You say, 'Kamala was "lying her ass off about being ahead in the polls." When did she ever say THAT? The only thing I heard her say, day after day, was the race was too close to call and everyone had to work their asses off.
CDL has a LONG and checkered history of making false assertions here backed up by ZERO. Which is why his credibility is so often called into question. So why do I doubt he has a source for this final assertion about Harris lying?

this having been done by a Republican candidate in today's woke political climate.  It was extraordinary.  

electoral college votes than Biden did, which is the ONLY official, constitutionally authorized standard for deciding the winner.  Regardless of the popular vote, Trump's victory was bigger than Biden's because the electoral college win was bigger.  Don't they teach about the electoral college controlling the outcome in your school district?

He can't really back up his own words so he changes the definition of "landslide." Proving once again that he'll just make shit up to avoid taking the L.
As for his claim that "big donors felt so betrayed by Kamala's lies that they will never donate to Democrats again," I've done a search and can't find him saying that. So pardon me if I feel skeptical of that claim.