ANYTHING to avoid 2/26!  

 
Trump told a gathering of Governors at the White House today that he is considering another strike on Iran in the next couple of days.  

 
He's also releasing all files on aliens and UFOs.

END OF MESSAGE

Bad guy Solomon Lane says, "There cannot be peace without first, a great suffering. The greater the suffering, the greater the peace".

Why attack now?  
Not seeing all this MAGat talking point about America First here. Opps… forgot ., his message was intended for the brain dead …My bad

END OF MESSAGE

I never thought Trump destroyed all the "nukes" in the first strike.    It was a message to make a deal or we can bomb your sites.

 
Now funny how you and others want to say "TAKE THAT MAGA's"..... yet Iran is an issue for the world.   How about the fact that the USA just found out how Iran is getting things from China and others thru shipping routes around SE Asia.      

 
But yeah.... this is about TAKE THAT MAGA's.       Iran hasn't come to the table or is ignoring other treaties when it comes to the Nukes.    They have ignored many past presidents and world leaders.    But yeah.... TAKE THAT TRUMP is the battle cry of people on the left.

Because at some point in time, they'll have to come to their senses that MACats have been taken of because of their stupidity or ignorance.
All this America First was all bullshit....SMH

Iran HAS BEEN at "the table" with us for days. And it was the US under Trump.1 that tore up the anti-nuke treaty we had with Iran. How'd that work out for us?

So the Nuke deal (JCPOA) that they kept trying to enrich uranium when they were not supposed to.....all the while under that agreement under OBAMA.    The one that they ignored.     GOT IT.

 
Things that happened:

 
Iran Promised:
1.  Reduce uranium stockpile by 98%
- Achieved briefly, then Iran restarted enrichment by 2019

 
2. Limit enrichment to 3.67%
-      Breached by 2021, enrichment hit 60%

 
3. Cut operational centrifuges
-       Initially met, then 2,000+ reactivated

 

 

For Christ sakes it is too easy to prove you wrong.

All of the things Iran did happened AFTER Trump pulled the US out of the deal in 2018.
Mimicking The SPOAT: OH GOD
And now for some FACTS from AI Overview:
"Iran initially complied with the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) following its implementation in January 2016. However, after the U.S. withdrew in 2018, Iran began rolling back its commitments in July 2019. As of 2026, Iran is not following the deal, having exceeded enrichment limits (up to 60%) and stockpile constraints.  
Initial Compliance (2016–2019): The IAEA verified that Iran was meeting its obligations under the JCPOA, which included restricting uranium enrichment to 3.67% and keeping stockpiles low.
Gradual Rollback (2019–2025): Following the U.S. withdrawal and subsequent sanctions, Iran ceased adhering to key limits in 2019. They increased uranium enrichment to 60% and expanded their stockpile."

Remember Iran wasn't letting in UN inspectors... Yeah... you forget about all of this..... it was Trust issues... Like my article pointed out.

 
So in 1 to 2 year they could go from 3% to 60% enrichment.... When they were not supposed to have any of this technology/capability/infrastructure/etc. in place or on Iranian soil.  

 
Yeah... keep telling yourself this.   It all "happened" after Trump pulled out.   That it wasn't happening while they were under the JCPOA.   It was Trust issues which was proven to be correct.   You know not letting in inspectors, not supposed to be working with other countries.....  It was the fact China/Russia and others were going behind UN and USA back to help Iran.     But yeah... all in the article I posted.

 
So again.... you keep failing.  Please keep calling me names and showing how your a STEREOTYPICAL liberal.    

"Our President [Obama] will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective."

Iran WAS letting in UN inspectors UNTIL TRUMP ABROGATED THE DEAL IN 2018.
You are a stereotypical liar and idiot. A true SPOAT.
But. keep declaring victory...
love your costume....

It was never really about trust with Iran...it was an Obama policy just as in that Trans Pacific Agreement or whatever its called. Now South Korea and others in that region are talking to China
Even to this day, trump still has that hard on for Obama...so lets cut the shit here.. its all about what a Black President accomplished.

....if Trump walks away from this with either a signed deal that creates freedom for 90 million Iranians or if he's forced to and successfully decapitates the monster like he did in Venezuela?

 
A few of you are going to just be so so so mad!

"If 'ifs' and 'buts' were candies and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas".

And his idiotic base will buy it.
Most righties here will do the circle jerk and salivate each other

Actually NO they were not "letting" them in.   They delayed and stalled.

 
But funny how a leftist wants to ignore history.

 
Iran, China, and Russia were not following the agreement 100%.   It is why "faith" wasn't there and why USA (Trump) bulled out of the agreement.   Plus the fact that we "gave them back" the money without any strings attached.   IE: More oversight of the "energy" program.   Plus they were also getting ballistic missiles....which they were not supposed to be getting.    YEAH.... facts you want to ignore.

You do have something correct with this one.    Trump does have a "hard on" for anything Obama did.... good or bad.

 
The whole Iran thing was giving the money back... plus more with ballistic missiles they were getting from China and Russia.  

 
But you are correct for whatever reason Trump was going after anything "Obama" related and looking to see if he would "one up it".... if it was a good deal.   If it was a bad deal.... he axed it completely.    

Trump didn't pull out because of Iranian lack of compliance. He pulled out because he hated everything Obama did -- and you even admitted it below. But you're too big a hack to admit it to me. Cuz it just hurts too much.
Go lick your wounds, pussy.

So Iran getting ballistic missiles wasn't an issue.   You know ones that can be used with NUKES.    So Iran "slow playing" allowing in Inspectors wasn't an issue.   Which was happening prior to Trump.

 
you know the "trust issues" or "good faith" issues.   Is why Trump got out of the deal.    Plus Trump was pissed about the money given back to them.      

 
I admitted that Trump was looking at everything Obama did with a fine-tooth comb.    I told you reasons why he pulled out of the deal.   WHICH YOU CANT UNDERSTAND AS FACTS.... which was bad for the USA and its allies (Isreal).    But yeah... ignore these FACTS.      

 
It is funny you never mentioned "giving back" the money.     Which was found out to fund HAMAS and terror in the area.   But yeah..... FACTS.    

For your reading....

 
You do know that the agreement had sunset clauses that allowed Iran to enrich uranimum.   Which many said was stupid to have in there... yeah 10 years was the clause.  Which would be right now!!!    

 
Also again bringing up the "cash".... which people knew Iran was funding terror groups.   We gave them CASH and plus others "unfroze" other assests with the agreement.

 
From article:
Many of the restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program "have expiration dates," according to the Council on Foreign Relations, noting for example that centrifuge restrictions would be lifted after 10 years and limits on how much low-enriched uranium Iran can possess after 15 years.

"Some of the deal’s opponents faulted these so-called sunset provisions, saying they would only delay Iran building a bomb while sanctions relief would allow it to underwrite terrorism in the region," the organization said.

Israel was among those who opposed the agreement, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calling it a "historic mistake" at the time.

 

Now if you want to argue that Trump should have built on this agreement.   FINE.   But he also thought he would have a new one in place.... Which he doesn't and has been working on.

 
But to keep a blind eye and say this agreement was "good" is bullshit.   Iran wasn't holding up to its side.

Was it because Obama was black? And that trashing anything Obama did played to his base??
Honest now

NOPE..... not about race.   But sad you are trying to make it about race.

 
-  How about the fact that some of the deals Obama did were shit deals.    Not favorable to the USA or allies (Isreal).    

 
-  How about the fact that Obama admin went after Trump.    You know like what is being found out every single day..... more evidence is tied that Obama knew what was going on with the Russia Gate lies, false dossier lies, etc.

 
-       How about the fact that Trump is an ego maniac and just wants to be seen as the "savior" type thing.      He wanted to be known as the "best negotiator" in the world.     Which at the time he pulled out of the agreement he was making deals left and right.  Thought he could get another one done.

 
But yeah.... you want to make it about RACE.    you are falling into the stereotypical liberal when you want to make things about "race".... when it isn't.    You could have talked about anyone of these above.... but you went with RACE.    You could have said revenge (but then would have to admit about Obama going after Trump).  You could mention narcissist personality.    But you had to say "race".

...because of the agenda that he brought to DC.  When he addressed the DNC convention and came into national view, his speech was pretty damn good.  I recall thinking, this guy almost sounds like a republican and was definitely talking to the center of the electorate.  This was a ruse and not what he was about at all.  

 
A very large part of Trump's base would be perfectly fine with a president who is black or female for that matter.  A candidate can't choose who supports him and if a Repub fights against commies, socialists etc...

You can dingle and tangle why it wasn’t about race but in reality… it was and even to this day…it still is

HOW?   Again.... HOW?

 
Just in your mind?    How is it about "race"?  

Why not have the video of say the Obamas in clown outfits? Trump approved and signed off on the Ape video because in his mind, he sees blacks as ape and it plays to his base...admit that and if you disagree then link me where trump apologized for the AI video? Remember the bucks stops with him and blaming a staffer who's probably still on staff doesn't count.

Seems like this was hashed out weeks ago but it's like hearing about "see russia from my house" and regardless of how untrue it is because it was never actually said, well, you know how dems are...

Episode… and make it look relevant..STFU

ickydik will be along soon to give you a hug...

 
....and maybe a little stinky finger

He didn't "sign off" on it.    He retweeted something that someone else produced.    The full video showed other things and wasn't "racist".    It was a video that had other democrats and republicans as animals.....But yeah.... facts escape you.

 

Try to make everything about RACE.     When it wasn't.

I think I’m going to keep this on copy and paste for all of my likes.

He had a problem with his policy.   Which many US citizens and business owners did.    

 
Look at the ACA debacle and our medical system.    People will argue our medical system was fucked prior.   But look at the increases (not including covid years).... the increases are not linear.    They take a huge JUMP after implementation of the ACA.    Yeah hospitals found out how to become more PROFITABLE because of the ACA.    Same goes for Pharma.    

 
His energy policy and start of "green" push.    Which killed many industries and as we keep finding out.... is kind of a scam.  The whole "global warming/cooling" crisis.   It drained US funds.

 
His tax policy.... raised taxes on EVERYONE.

 
His banking policy.... which some was good and took away predatory lending.   But as Trump was in real estate it kind of killed him.  Because of the regulations put into place for everyone.   It took away some of banks ability to "give loans" on a hand shake type thing.   Hence Trump and his bank lawsuit/crimes.    You know how regulations "changed" to go after Trump.   This all started under Obama policy and pushed what States could "change" regulations or couldn't change regulations.

 
How about the digital spying.... what I mean is digital surveillance increased under Obama and laws he passed.   This is on EVERY CITIZEN.

 
So yeah.... there I just touch on a few policy issues of Obama.     Let alone the stuff we are finding out he was apart of or know with Trump campaign stuff, spying on his campaign, trying to take him "down", etc.  

 
See how none of it has to do with RACE.

Too Stupid to Reply to...

So these were not issues????     But people want to make it about race.

In 1973, the U.S. Department of Justice sued Donald Trump, his father Fred Trump, and their company, Trump Management, for engaging in racial discrimination against Black and Puerto Rican tenants in their New York City apartment buildings. The suit alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act of 1968, marking one of the largest discrimination cases of that era.The case was settled in 1975 with a consent decree in which the Trumps did not admit to any wrongdoing, but were required to adopt procedures to ensure non-discrimination, such as providing weekly vacancy lists to the Urban League. BUT..In 1978, the Justice Department sued again, alleging that the Trump organization continued to violate the 1975 settlement by refusing to rent to Black tenants.  
THEN...in 1989, Donald Trump took out full-page newspaper ads calling for the death penalty for five Black and Latino teenagers accused of assault in Central Park; they were later exonerated, and Trump has faced criticism for continuing to maintain their guilt.
So, given all this, why would ANYONE assume the issue he with Obama is not "about race?" At least in part.
Then there's the 2011 roasting Trump got from Obama at the White House Correspondents Dinner.

I know her intelligence has been questioned frequently but I don't recall anyone using the word "stupid".  If that's how she wants to identify, who are we to judge??

Trump Denial Syndrome....you'll bent over backwards to defend trump. no matter what.
Retweeted someone else did is putting it out there...But yeah, blame someone else.

Again, we KNOW you hate women and sex workers. We get it. You don't have to emphasize it with every post to get attention. You didn't get held enough, and now you're a stalker. But I'm the stupid, dumb fool. LOL. Tell yourself whatever you want. Again, I have no problem referring to myself as a stupid, dumb hooker who makes mistakes. I'm not infallible, like your Orange Jesus.  

 
But once you start to debate whether climate change is real or discuss the environment, when Orange Jesus just stripped the EPA of all their power. Digital spying began when Bush passed the Patriot Act, which is the basis of ALL digital spying. Banking? How about a 50-year mortgage? That doesn't seem predatory at all. It really is too stupid for me. Sorry. Again, you wouldn't understand.

-- Modified on 2/24/2026 4:49:04 PM

...love me back!  I actually find a sharp or witty woman appealing to me and as such, get beyond the physical attributes and flaws too still have a great time but we've discussed this before.  You are the one referring to yourself as the stupid, dumb hooker and I was just surprised you left the vocational details out with the above post when you literally wrote "too stupid to reply...."

 
Wow, that whole last paragraph thing....has me concerned and I think you probably should take some time off today like you said you were going to and finish that paper.  I've never said that climate isn't changing...that's what it always has done and it will continue too, it's only man who is arrogant enough to think that they are going to change it.  When you went spinning off the table with digital spying, lol I was like WTF haha....and that you had to change it before hitting the send button just makes me wonder what you took out!  Bigfoot?  Freemasonry?  The International Order of the Oddfellows?

I said product. First product done! Thank you for the congratulations. I was cooking dinner, grading homework, and multitasking. It's a woman thing. I couldn't write a then if I wanted to. And you don't know what the hell I do or what I'm in school for. That REALLY bothers you, doesn't it? LOL. Tell us you're a stalker without telling us you're a stalker.  

About to work on the second one. I'm sorry that you don't know how to edit a post. Also, before you go attacking me, maybe you should at least read the post that I was replying to. But like Trump, you want to make this all about me and you. I'm about to work on my second product. I'm doing them in order of ease. Knocking out the easy ones first. Wish me luck!

It can be deduced that, at a certain age, some people go back to school to learn things they don't know.  If you have the time and inclination, it's a worthy pursuit.  It's only a waste of time if you get hit by a bus the day after graduation.  Lol

and the other side is holding a full house; you place the race card.  What else do Dems have to lose that they haven't already lost to Trump.  Trump is polling very high no matter how much the Dems twist the poll questions to try to manipulate a lower result.  Dems are still embracing the ideas that have only a 20% popularity rate with voters, including nearly HALF of Democrats.  I hope that keep it up into election season.  

Or at least he pretends he doesn't. So he's either stupid or a liar
Perhaps both.

I was refering to when you spoke about a paper you had to finish and I think you are too but now want to call it a product.  I'm not sure though but I'm expecting anything with the way your rants are rolling out today.  But here are your words...

 

"This is the last thing that I'm going to post. I have to write a paper by midnight 🕛. If you see me in the board today doing anything but copying and pasting then PLEASE scold me for being a dumb hooker"

 
I'm not here to judge OR scold but this was 9 hours ago and you've got a whole page of posts since then.  

END OF MESSAGE

Snaf,

 
You're always watching me. All of my work is done and submitted. Right in time for me to live-tweet with SOTU. It's already interesting. Doesn't Melania have any accessories on? Must have gotten a lil' criticism on her movie. Congressman Green...

 
Golden Age of America? I really hope we make it to 250 years... He's already told like 10lies and it's been 10 minutes!

 
-K

That was HIS DADS doing.... and Donald was listed on the lawsuit because his name was on the deed and a part of the company.    You know go after everyone in a lawsuit.   This shows that you don't know how lawsuits work?      Also at that time MANY landlords were going thru the exact same type of lawsuits because of past practices or not changing past practices.    

 
Then his talks about central park 5.    Well those 5 were found guilty and then after DNA evidence that wasn't available at the time.   They were exonerated.     PLUS the fact they caught a serial rapists who was the person.   But yet you will point fingers and blame others prior to all evidence presented and assign "quick" guilt.   JUST LIKE TRUMP DID.   Many in this case were pissed and wanted the death penalty.  

 
But let facts cloud you like always.

First of all, how the FUCK do you know the anti-black renting actions were "HIS DADS doing" and that The Donald had no involvement? You don't. So why did you say it? Because you're a partisan hack. If he was "a part of the company" he was part of everything it did, even if Daddy was mostly in charge. And then you have the sheer gall to say everyone was doing it. As if that makes it OK.
As for the Central Park 5, Trump hasn't retracted what he did TO THIS DAY despite having been proven wrong. But of course it had nothing to do with their being black. And again, you write it off because "Many in this case...wanted the death penalty." So you're a racist, too.

I liked it so much that I wish I could 'put a ring on it!'

Because it was over a period of TIME.    Like it has been happening for YEARS.    YOU do know that in 1973 Trump Countersued the US Government over these allegations that his father and company got in trouble for in 1978.  

 
You know that Trump didn't start working for his Father until 1968 and it was doing repairs and collecting rents.   1971 Trump wanted to expand to Manhattan but his dad didn't want too.   He dad want to stay in the "low income" outer boroughs.   This is when Trump started up in Manhattan.    In 1972 people filed the complaints.....So yeah.... FACTS MATTER.   Timelines matter.... etc.

 
Not a partisan HACK.... but know how things work and history.    

 
But yep.... facts matter.

 
From Fred Trumps Wiki page:

 
Minority applicants turned away from renting apartments complained to the New York City Commission on Human Rights and the Urban League, leading these groups to send test applicants to Trump-owned complexes in July 1972. They found that white people were offered apartments, while black people were generally turned away (by being told there were no vacancies);[m] according to the superintendent of Beach Haven Apartments, this was at the direction of his boss.[115] Both of the aforementioned advocacy organizations then raised the issue with the Justice Department.[98] In October 1973, the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) filed a civil rights lawsuit against the Trump Organization (Fred Trump, chair, and Donald Trump, president) for infringing the Fair Housing Act of 1968.[98] In response, Trump attorney Roy Cohn countersued for $100 million in damages, accusing the DoJ of false accusations.[98][116]

The FBI interviewed about three dozen former Trump employees.[116] Some testified that they had no knowledge of any racial profiling practices and that a small percentage of their apartments were rented to blacks or Puerto Ricans.[n] A former doorman testified that his supervisor had instructed him to tell prospective black tenants that the rent was double its actual amount.[117] Four landlords or rental agents confirmed that applications sent to the Trump organization's head office for approval were coded by the race of the applicant.[118] One former employee testified that a code – which he believed was used throughout the Brooklyn branch of the company – referred to "low lifes" such as "blacks, Puerto Ricans, apparent drug users, or any other type of undesirable applicant", and nine times out of ten it meant the applicant was black; blacks were also falsely told there were no vacancies.[116] A rental agent who had worked with the company for two weeks said that when he asked Fred Trump if he should rent to blacks, he was told that it was "absolutely against the law to discriminate",[119] but after asking again, he was instructed "not to rent to blacks", and was further advised to:[120]

get rid of the blacks that were in the building by telling them cheap housing was available for them at only $500 down payment, which Trump would offer to pay himself. Trump didn't tell me where this housing was located. He advised me not to rent to persons on welfare.

Meanwhile, Trump acquired up to 20% of Brooklyn's Starrett City, a large, federally subsidized housing complex which opened in 1974 with the stated desegregation goal of renting 70% of its units to white people and the rest to minorities.[121][122]

A consent decree between the DoJ and the Trump Organization was signed on June 10, 1975, with both sides claiming victory – the Trump Organization because the settlement did not require them "to accept persons on welfare as tenants", and the head of DoJ's housing division for the decree being "one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated".[98][118] It personally and corporately prohibited the Trumps from "discriminating against any person in the ... sale or rental of a dwelling", and "required Trump to advertise vacancies in minority papers [for two years], promote minorities to professional jobs, and list vacancies on a preferential basis".[118] Finally, it ordered the Trumps to "thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis with ... the Fair Housing Act of 1968".[98][123]

Just because Trump wasn't there when the biased renting began does NOT mean he wasn't part of it when he joined the company. Yes, FACTS matter. Notwithstanding your cut-and-paste novel.