Politics and Religion

#3 in the world is our future?
Priapus53 929 reads
posted
1 / 79

You remind me of a departed troll who posted illiterate threads because English was his second language----that the case with you or are you dyslexic ?

As for your subject matter, I'm not wild about many of the economic decisions BHO has made, but, the majority of the economic mess occurred under Geoerge Bush's watch, which of course, you conveniently neglected to mention.

Priapus53 1195 reads
posted
2 / 79

dude, you're so illiterate you couldn't even READ a book--------:)

GaGambler 1530 reads
posted
3 / 79

and once you have elevated your writing skills to a third grade level, then and only then you might want to take on writing an entire book.lmao

SpellingTutor 1265 reads
posted
4 / 79

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=39&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&SearchType=1&Author=Priapus&DayFrom=30&DayTo=0&MessageID=138524&frmSearch=1#138524


Its spelled Cockalorum

Merriam- Webster "a boastful and self-important person; a strutting little fellow

About the word:

If cockalorum suggests a crowing cock, that's because cockalorum probably comes from kockeloeren – an obsolete Dutch dialect verb meaning "to crow."

Farlex "cock·a·lo·rum
n.
1. A little man with an unduly high opinion of himself.
2. Boastful talk; braggadocio.

alpahdictionary.com  • cockalorum •
Meaning: 1. A little man with an extraordinarily high opinion of himself, who 'crows' about himself a lot. 2. The 'crowing' of a cockalorum, cockamamie boasting, false self-praise.




Priapus53 2235 reads
posted
5 / 79

why hide behind a cowardly alias ? Do you consider yourself a 3rd rate pedant because you're insecure about not progressing beyond the 9th grade ?! I think a little "cockalorum confidence" would be therapeutic for you. You could acquire that by obtaining that long delayed GED for yourself, which would get you over your "insecurity hump"------;)

-- Modified on 2/26/2011 10:49:45 AM

GaGambler 1550 reads
posted
6 / 79

Six years of GWB and a GOP Congress, and then the last four years can be firmly placed at the feet of the Dems.

At least the GOP is trying to make some meaningful cuts, not suprisingly the Dems are fighting these cuts tooth and nail. this should make for an interesting 2012 election season.

Personally I would not be surprised to see Obama reelected, but with a GOP controlled Congress. I would not be terribly displeased with that outcome. It sure beats having either party claiming a "mandate".

nuguy46 7017 reads
posted
8 / 79

after more than two years of 'establishing' jobs', etc. this is what we can look forward too?
...that george bush did us in, didn't he!!

dncphil 16 Reviews 694 reads
posted
9 / 79

Predicting the future is easy after it happens.  There are a hundred things I could think of off the top of my head that will change the current course, whatever that course may be.  They would result in a landslide for Obama and the Dems, to a crushing defeat for Obama and the Dems, to a close election and gridlock.

Other options would result in war or peace or stability or chaos.

My favorite prediction used to be the slogan of the left who went to the USSR in the early days, and reported that they had seen the future - before the USSR collapsed.  Even then the future is iffy.  Can Mr. Dumptyovich be put back together?

China has incredilble problems and I wouldn't bet on the future there either way.  These include a population of decreasing women, increasing percentages of old people, horrific polution that makes L.A. in the worst days of the 50's look good, and a totalitarian government that is starting to open a little and internet access is increasing.  I would be very surprised if the leaders in China are not looking at Egypt with a little concern.

Posted By: nuguy46
after more than two years of 'establishing' jobs', etc. this is what we can look forward too?
...that george bush did us in, didn't he!!

nuguy46 822 reads
posted
10 / 79

War, peace, Stability or chaos.
 US in decline.

charlie445 3 Reviews 1079 reads
posted
13 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 1037 reads
posted
14 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

charlie445 3 Reviews 2223 reads
posted
16 / 79
charlie445 3 Reviews 1447 reads
posted
17 / 79

I will dig up some new words to describe some of your more insightful posts....lol

Fair_Use 29 Reviews 1450 reads
posted
18 / 79

I just want to be the first to say — enjoy your retirement!

marikod 1 Reviews 1374 reads
posted
19 / 79

as the prototype for cockalorum, a word defined as a "self important little man."

SpellingTutor 938 reads
posted
20 / 79

Priapus"why hide behind a cowardly alias ? Do you consider yourself a 3rd rate pedant because you're insecure about not progressing beyond the 9th grade ?! I think a little "cockalorum confidence" would be therapeutic for you. You could acquire that by obtaining that long delayed GED for yourself, which would get you over your "insecurity hump"

Actually, I have no doubt,in the World of reality, I am much more self confident than you.
If spelling tutor was your idea of me trying  an  alias disguise , your mind is blind.
Every regular poster here, could easily tell, I am your spelling tutor,especially since I once again threw your cockalorum manner at you,after you corrected someone for to, instead of too.
 Do you get my drift?
In your defense,sarcasm tends to fly over your empty, dense space.
 Are you telling me your internet cockalorum confidence, helps you in public? I think not.
My wager says you are quiet and self contained in the real world,extremely  wary of allowing strangers in your personal space , lest you be revealed as the fraud you are.
Riddle me this! If I was insecure why would I admit to dropping out of ninth grade,or my superb janitor skills and if you were secure why not debate someone instead of changing the subject by correcting spelling. I doubt I am the only one that thinks it is odd, you don't correct your blow buddies when they misspell.
I am inclined to believe, the insecure would more likely exaggerate,belittle others, and boast online, where their real identity, is hidden from reality, while wary of attending a
M@G.
Since aliases make you whine on time, I am going on a quadseasonal hiatus. Until further notice, I will be posting on P@R board,via alias other than quadseasonal.
 I won't always be flagrant in announcing my alias is me. I won't use quadseasonal unless you accuse the wrong alias of my identity.
TYVM for your input.. I was starting to feel some boredom in the air.
 Not sure if you read the TER  memo below.
See you in a day or two.
I'll be busy conjuring up aliases.
Have a great Night.




"Here are NINE very acceptable reasons for the use of an alias.

1.Use of topical humor when the alias enhances the humor

2.The creation of a character(literary license) to be used in an informative, fun, innocuously sarcastic, philanthropic, as well as topical way.

3.Anonymity for when regional or associational sensitivities may be of concern, particularly when there are members out there who will harass you on the boards when you disagree strongly with them.

4.Innocuous playing of "devils advocate" in a discussion or debate where one wishes to not be further/future aligned with one faction or the other.  If you look at the GD Board, there are providers who have flat out stated that they won't see someone based on some of their posts.  Why would any guy take the chance.

5.Avoidance of suffering political fallout for a comment that may have been wrongly construed in a possibly volatile discussion.  Some of these regular posters are hyper-sensitive, and also don't read the whole post before going ballistic.

6.Posting investigative reports, meet & greet announcements, helpful advice, or other similar types of useful information where the use of a user-name could prove problematic or open the poster up to incessant PM's and questions.

7.Concerns in revealing your review history.  This is a big one when you are posting about a particular provider that you are not going to name. In those situations, you open ALL of your reviewed providers to the public guessing who you are talking about.  It's not fair to the others.

8.Ability to contribute where you would otherwise feel embarrassed to speak candidly.  Some are just too shy, but will post under an alias.

9.To avoid a google search turning up your review history.  Some of these guys only post in alias for this reason."






SpellingTutor 1892 reads
posted
21 / 79

I would imagine a drunkard cockalorum like Pri, is often on his knees,pleading with the audience, hoping to be another Willy Loman?

Tabb13 3 Reviews 2237 reads
posted
22 / 79

Say what you want about "W" there was a Dem congress his last two years. Anything involving money, budget had to be approved by them. The Prez does not handle the purse. Even if he used his veto, the Dems had the votes to overturn. So let's place the economic mess where it belongs.

nuguy46 1224 reads
posted
23 / 79
nuguy46 2617 reads
posted
24 / 79

agree 100%.
some who are reading this thread, don't seem to get the point.

Priapus53 983 reads
posted
25 / 79

your moronic writings & typing style make your posts a dead giveaway, no matter what alias you use.

Btw, do you look like Michael Steele ?

dncphil 16 Reviews 1526 reads
posted
26 / 79

Posted By: charlie445
I will dig up some new words to describe some of your more insightful posts....lol

mattradd 40 Reviews 1665 reads
posted
28 / 79

which met, not matter what congress passed he was just going to do what he wanted to do in spite of them.

charlie445 3 Reviews 963 reads
posted
29 / 79
charlie445 3 Reviews 1227 reads
posted
30 / 79
inicky46 61 Reviews 1364 reads
posted
31 / 79

You are simply wrong on the facts re "the Dems had the votes to overturn."  A Presidential veto can  only be  overturned by a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate.  The Dems never had that by themselves.  In the Senate the Dems had a bare 60-vote margin for only a few months before Ted Kennedy got sick, and 60 votes is only good for breaking a filibuster, not to overturn a veto.  As Yogi says: "You could look it up."

dncphil 16 Reviews 1498 reads
posted
32 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 2124 reads
posted
33 / 79
willywonka4u 22 Reviews 1534 reads
posted
34 / 79

...about the same time that Dems were sworn in. We're still recovering from that bubble popping.

The Dems do get plenty of blame for not solving the problem like they should have. And Clinton should be blamed for signing into law banking deregulation that created this problem. We'd be in deep shit with just that to deal with. But with endless tax cuts, two foreign wars, unfunded expansions of Medicaid, we're in deep shit.

Unfortunately, neither party shows even close to enough leadership to solving these problems. I fully expect the next 5-15 years to be pretty shitty.

dncphilsdog 1368 reads
posted
35 / 79

Grrrrrr!

-- Modified on 2/27/2011 11:54:42 AM

dncphil 16 Reviews 1123 reads
posted
36 / 79
dncphilsdog 826 reads
posted
37 / 79

I just peed on the rug again!

dncphil 16 Reviews 988 reads
posted
38 / 79
dncphilsdog 1084 reads
posted
39 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 1187 reads
posted
40 / 79

I mean, bark, bark!

dncphilsdog 2392 reads
posted
41 / 79

No!  I'm your running dog!  Bow-wow-wow!!!  I bite, too.  And I have been wiping my ass on your carpet.
PS: Also, I've been up on your bed, phil, and I have fleas.

dncphil 16 Reviews 1470 reads
posted
42 / 79

Posted By: dncphilsdog
I mean, bark, bark!

dncphil 16 Reviews 995 reads
posted
43 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 1170 reads
posted
44 / 79
dncphilsdog 1573 reads
posted
45 / 79

...'cuz I just pissed on your shoe!  Woof!

dncphilsdog 1960 reads
posted
46 / 79

I just wiped my ass on your carpet.  Bow-wow-wow!

dncphilsdog 1494 reads
posted
47 / 79

Chewed your slippers.  Buried the remote.  Yip!

dncphil 16 Reviews 1238 reads
posted
48 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphil 16 Reviews 1517 reads
posted
49 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphil 16 Reviews 1599 reads
posted
50 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 1979 reads
posted
51 / 79

*snif* youi are not the master you once were.  Yip!  When I was  a puppy I so looked up to you.  Now you are just sad.

dncphilsdog 2127 reads
posted
52 / 79

*sigh*  Hardly worth a glance.  bark... Going to chew on your Barka Lounger.

dncphil 16 Reviews 1233 reads
posted
54 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphil 16 Reviews 792 reads
posted
55 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 1581 reads
posted
56 / 79

...can't you see how futile it is?  You've been reduced to one-word come-backs by a canine!  You must be so humliated.  Now I own "bark."  You really shouldn't use it any more, though I'm sure you will since it's apparantly all you can say now.  Woof!  Rrrroowwllll!  Yap!  Grrrrr!!!!!

dncphilsdog 1005 reads
posted
57 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 710 reads
posted
58 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 1784 reads
posted
59 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 721 reads
posted
60 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 1286 reads
posted
61 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 721 reads
posted
62 / 79
dncphilsdog 1116 reads
posted
63 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 927 reads
posted
64 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphil 16 Reviews 1598 reads
posted
65 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 1292 reads
posted
66 / 79

*snore*
PS:  You really should let sleeping dogs lie.

dncphilsdog 1898 reads
posted
67 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 2113 reads
posted
68 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 1702 reads
posted
69 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 1157 reads
posted
70 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphil 16 Reviews 2130 reads
posted
71 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphil 16 Reviews 1458 reads
posted
72 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 1975 reads
posted
73 / 79
dncphilsdog 1937 reads
posted
74 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 942 reads
posted
75 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphil 16 Reviews 1966 reads
posted
76 / 79
dncphil 16 Reviews 889 reads
posted
77 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

dncphilsdog 1189 reads
posted
78 / 79
dncphilsdog 1655 reads
posted
79 / 79


END OF MESSAGE

Register Now!