but I'm already sensing that mid-summer, over-heated brain hostility that over-takes many of us each off-season. God knows I'm guilty at times. But perhaps there's another perspective in all this...
First & foreskin, I meant foremost, the Dow Jones reached its all time high yesterday, so maybe this will help consumers with their monetary reserves. It's my belief that true economic behavior is really based upon what they tell us (possibly they seek a specific reaction in its respect) vs being based upon behavioral patterns reflecting the 'actual' state it's in. Either theory on this is still good news. So Bailey, hang in there doll. Second, & to get back to the original topic for a minute, Elvis, surely you must know there are alternatives to providing references. ... Verification sites (i.e. P411, Date-Check, etc) ... Traditional screening of a Provider you can research to deem trustworthy for the sharing of your confidential info (research both within & outside of TER). This will only be necessary until you can acquire at least two references, which then is the min most Providers require to meet you. IMO, b/c I'm sure at some point I've been guilty of it too, attempting to seek pity through the tone of your post, will likely produce results in opposition, unfortunately. Just sayin'... Third, Bailey & riorunner both have good points regarding review scores, adversely. While it is true we ladies want high scores, occasionally we get a reviewer who consistently scores low for all his review-ees, affecting our avg score (regardless of intention). And while this unfair discrepancy can be discovered by way of further researching hers & his other reviews, some researchers may not know of this cross-examination method for sorting out truth. In the opposite respect, the same goes with a reviewer who consistently scores high. But if anything like myself, I desire that only truth be published within my reviews & therefor I am confident that these scores will remain high, b/c it's my obligation to prove these testimonies true. Worse yet, & even more misleading to the researcher, is when the flat-out fake review goes into print. This is an atrocity, scored good or bad, & is frustratingly difficult to have removed from its publication source, posted fugazi by jackasses either seeking free site membership/VIP status, or intended revenge. A community without reviews though, would turn it upside down, while they have their advantages & disadvantages. Forth, welcome NikkiAz. And I'll be the one to step up & say, it's not necessary to apologize for interjecting in a post thread. This is your prerogative & likewise, how these boards prevail with success. And anyone who confuses interjection with interruption is plain retarded (yeah, I said it! And I like sentence fragments and/or beginning with conjunctions too!)! Especially when your contributions are legible, polite, & beneficial, your input is welcome IMO. Concern of confrontation with a board bully is usually nothing to ponder here, as one was banned & the others hang out on the General board where they've got their own fan club. (What?) Anyhow, I agree with your perspective regarding gratitude & reviews... although my opinion doesn't matter related to your posting rights. Further, your acknowledgement & appreciation of being surrounded by other beautiful, quality Providers, is an attractive appeal. Within itself, this is what creates competition (a positive word with a negative connotation), which fortunately keeps those who produce products/services, striving to be their best... good for the manufacturer's own self-improvement, but ultimately, is the key factor behind the variety & quality choices we consumers benefit from. Awareness of this, I think, is mandatory for success, & a win-win formula for both the Hobbyist & the Provider. Your attitude should serve you well here & I wish you all the best. Lastly, to whom it may concern, & I ask to be reminded of this when perhaps I am not following suit... but the saying goes, "you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar". JMO. Have fun & stay safe everyone!I'm lonely, not unattractive (Okay, I'm SUPER attractive, I bet), and I have money to burn. But I don't have my damned references to spend time with the ladies I'd WANT to spend time with.
I understand the requirement for references. Believe me, I do. Protection is paramount for everyone involved.
But my loneliness may cause me to look up a sketchy BP girl.
Don't do it, loneliness! Don't!
I'm hot, fit and have mind blowing skills, yet here's another day for me without a penis to play with. It's just me, Ms. left index finger and Ms. clit together again watching tubegalore.
I'm so lonely I can't walk through the produce section at the grocery store, so shut your fricking pie hole. FYI your review scores are horrible, that's why nobody wants to see you
I'm so lonely I can't walk through the produce section at the grocery store, so shut your fricking pie hole. FYI your review scores are horrible, that's why nobody wants to see you
What gives?
Ladies like high scoring reviews, 8-10's many depend on reviews as advertisement, his are low. Just being a realist pointing the facts out to him, that's what gives.
I'm so lonely I can't walk through the produce section at the grocery store, so shut your fricking pie hole. FYI your review scores are horrible, that's why nobody wants to see you
What makes you say that his review scores are horrible? He only has 2 and one of them is the providers only review. The other is inline w/the 9 other reviews.
What gives?
"Ladies like high scoring reviews"? Well no fooling! But they should be earned and a reviewer has the right to score however they want. Personally, I believe that numbers are very inflated and for years haven't put much faith in them. Have seen WAY too many ladies scored 8 to 10 that I leave thinking WTF!!
Bottom line, a reviewer has the right to score however they see fit.
Respectfully.....RR
Yowza. Just whining a bit, that's all.
Whoa Nelly back the boat up, don't be ragging on me for pointing out the facts.
You guys are the ones who score us, or your penis scores us. If you along with any other men think reviews are inflated, then only you can change it. Just remember this business screws with everyone's self image and esteem, all the ladies want 10's and all the men want John Holmes dick
This subject came up in a city I was visiting a couple months ago. If you don't mind I'd like to offer my take on this subject...
I am most appreciative of any Gentleman that chooses to spend time with me. There are so many great choices and beautiful and wonderful Ladies it has to be hard to figure out which ones may be a match for you.
When I decided to become a Provider the first thing I was told about reviews was...respect them as they are a indication of how you did and how you were perceived....If a gentleman wants to see me again I am honored he had such a good time I earned that return visit. If he doesn't then I either did not do my job right or I was just not what he liked or wanted...either way I am grateful I got to meet him and at least enjoy that one time I did see him..
The other thing I was told is "he who hath the gold makes the rules"..My Assistant is a wise person and has taught me be grateful for the business I do get and not worry about the business I don't get as I have no control over that. Do my job each and every time to the best of my ability and if all the stars align odds are I will get a return visit at some point in time...and to be perfectly honest I enjoy variety also...isn't that part of why we do what we do?
Thanks for reading and if I have offended anyone with my thoughts I apologize in advance
Nikki
Hi Nikki;
First off, if you're new here then allow me to say welcome. I hope your time at TER is both fun and successful! Thanks for chiming in Nikki....with an attitude like yours you should do very well. In fact I've just added you to my faves and will definitely make a point of meeting you at some point.
I agree with almost all of your comments. The one that I'd take issue with is "he who hath the gold makes the rules". While admitting that this is too often true it rubs me the wrong way. Guess I prefer that "he who is righteous makes the rules" though I know I'm tilting at windmills to hope that would always be the case. I've always been a rebellious one. Thanks again for your thoughts......RR
Never apologize for speaking your mind in a respectful, articulated and well thought out manner. I thought what you said here was right on course and agree with what and how you said it. Even if I did not agree, I still would have respected what you said because of how you said it. Without even looking at your profile or reading your reviews, I hope one day we will have the pleasure of meeting. E
Aww Bailey....I'm not ragging on you. I simply thought that you were a bit unfair to elvis and believe that daddio made a good point.
I will agree with your statement that it's the guys who score and therefore the guys who are responsible for, what I perceive as, inflated scores. I won't even get into all my thoughts on that subject here & now.
As for self image and esteem issues....Your reviews should go far in putting to rest any twinges of those sorts of issues you might have. Even if inflated...lol Inflated or not, I look at reviews as being relative so congrats on your high scores.
Lastly, while I've never seen Mr. Holmes dick I'm quite satisfied with my own, thank you very much. :>)
Regards.....RR
WTF?? You have never seen John Holmes giant dick......like seriously lol? You can nag on me all you want, just wait until I get laid.
As for unfair to Elvis, sometimes the true facts are a bitter pill to swallow, ladies who want high reviews are not going to want to see him for fear of a low review from him period.... Elvis I don't depend on reviews, so if you can prove you're not a nut case to me, then this nutcase will chain you in my dungeon and cripple you, but you have to sign a waiver first.
I will agree with your statement that it's the guys who score and therefore the guys who are responsible for, what I perceive as, inflated scores. I won't even get into all my thoughts on that subject here & now.
As for self image and esteem issues....Your reviews should go far in putting to rest any twinges of those sorts of issues you might have. Even if inflated...lol Inflated or not, I look at reviews as being relative so congrats on your high scores.
Lastly, while I've never seen Mr. Holmes dick I'm quite satisfied with my own, thank you very much. :>)
Regards.....RR
Let me finally put this issue to rest.... I have John Holmes' dick.
I had a shill reviewer write all about it on another "providers who rate hobbyists" website. Ha!
As for unfair to Elvis, sometimes the true facts are a bitter pill to swallow, ladies who want high reviews are not going to want to see him for fear of a low review from him period.... Elvis I don't depend on reviews, so if you can prove you're not a nut case to me, then this nutcase will chain you in my dungeon and cripple you, but you have to sign a waiver first.
I will agree with your statement that it's the guys who score and therefore the guys who are responsible for, what I perceive as, inflated scores. I won't even get into all my thoughts on that subject here & now.
As for self image and esteem issues....Your reviews should go far in putting to rest any twinges of those sorts of issues you might have. Even if inflated...lol Inflated or not, I look at reviews as being relative so congrats on your high scores.
Lastly, while I've never seen Mr. Holmes dick I'm quite satisfied with my own, thank you very much. :>)
Regards.....RR
Ok Bailey...I'm on a really boring conference call so I looked up john Holmes dick...lol Yawn...He's got nothing on Rasputin, the Russian mystic, whose dick is on display in a St Petersburg museum. I kid you not. It's pickled in a jar and measures eleven inches soft.
I'll stand by my earlier comment and repeat, I'm satisfied with mine. :>) Ciao....RR
PS---How 'bout I come over and rag on you while I lay you? If we tire of listening to one another I'm sure we both have things to stick in a mouth that will silence someone.
Any provider that has self image or esteem issues over a review they receive should probably find another line of work or grow a little thicker skin. Men are assholes deal with it.
do NOT want John Holmes dick.. it was too big to work with and he could only get the damn thing to half mast before gravity took over and it pointed to the floor instead of the ceiling...
I would rather be classified with the piss-ant crawling up the elephant's hind leg with rape on his mind.. at least he had moxy....
We have went from Elvis and his sexual frustration to my sexual frustration to inflated reviews to a new lady saying hi (Hi Nikki) to Maxwell claiming he has a monster cock, which I'm investigating that as we speak. Now Riorunner is getting paid as he searches for massive dicks online at work..... very nice Phoenix, just how it should be.
This should wake the board up with many more weird subjects and topics from people in this thread
LMAO Bailey, well put! Just an FYI...I was paying the folks on the boring call I was on. One of the perks of being an owner is to be able to browse TER if I so choose while paying someone to tell me what I already knew. Regards.....RR
but I'm already sensing that mid-summer, over-heated brain hostility that over-takes many of us each off-season. God knows I'm guilty at times. But perhaps there's another perspective in all this...
First & foreskin, I meant foremost, the Dow Jones reached its all time high yesterday, so maybe this will help consumers with their monetary reserves. It's my belief that true economic behavior is really based upon what they tell us (possibly they seek a specific reaction in its respect) vs being based upon behavioral patterns reflecting the 'actual' state it's in. Either theory on this is still good news. So Bailey, hang in there doll.
Second, & to get back to the original topic for a minute, Elvis, surely you must know there are alternatives to providing references. ... Verification sites (i.e. P411, Date-Check, etc) ... Traditional screening of a Provider you can research to deem trustworthy for the sharing of your confidential info (research both within & outside of TER). This will only be necessary until you can acquire at least two references, which then is the min most Providers require to meet you. IMO, b/c I'm sure at some point I've been guilty of it too, attempting to seek pity through the tone of your post, will likely produce results in opposition, unfortunately. Just sayin'...
Third, Bailey & riorunner both have good points regarding review scores, adversely. While it is true we ladies want high scores, occasionally we get a reviewer who consistently scores low for all his review-ees, affecting our avg score (regardless of intention). And while this unfair discrepancy can be discovered by way of further researching hers & his other reviews, some researchers may not know of this cross-examination method for sorting out truth. In the opposite respect, the same goes with a reviewer who consistently scores high. But if anything like myself, I desire that only truth be published within my reviews & therefor I am confident that these scores will remain high, b/c it's my obligation to prove these testimonies true. Worse yet, & even more misleading to the researcher, is when the flat-out fake review goes into print. This is an atrocity, scored good or bad, & is frustratingly difficult to have removed from its publication source, posted fugazi by jackasses either seeking free site membership/VIP status, or intended revenge. A community without reviews though, would turn it upside down, while they have their advantages & disadvantages.
Forth, welcome NikkiAz. And I'll be the one to step up & say, it's not necessary to apologize for interjecting in a post thread. This is your prerogative & likewise, how these boards prevail with success. And anyone who confuses interjection with interruption is plain retarded (yeah, I said it! And I like sentence fragments and/or beginning with conjunctions too!)! Especially when your contributions are legible, polite, & beneficial, your input is welcome IMO. Concern of confrontation with a board bully is usually nothing to ponder here, as one was banned & the others hang out on the General board where they've got their own fan club. (What?) Anyhow, I agree with your perspective regarding gratitude & reviews... although my opinion doesn't matter related to your posting rights. Further, your acknowledgement & appreciation of being surrounded by other beautiful, quality Providers, is an attractive appeal. Within itself, this is what creates competition (a positive word with a negative connotation), which fortunately keeps those who produce products/services, striving to be their best... good for the manufacturer's own self-improvement, but ultimately, is the key factor behind the variety & quality choices we consumers benefit from. Awareness of this, I think, is mandatory for success, & a win-win formula for both the Hobbyist & the Provider. Your attitude should serve you well here & I wish you all the best.
Lastly, to whom it may concern, & I ask to be reminded of this when perhaps I am not following suit... but the saying goes, "you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar". JMO. Have fun & stay safe everyone!
Yaaa, but you catch the most flies with shit, so how does that work? Fourth?
Simply put, amazingly thought out, well said, humble, but yet said with confidence! Applause!!! E
Is....whatever!
All I can think about is how hot Bailey is and she needs to get laid. Still saving my pennies...
Vampizoris (aka John Holmes wanna-be)
All I can think about is how hot Bailey is and she needs to get laid. Still saving my pennies...

Vampizoris (aka John Holmes wanna-be)
Vampy, you're a doll!!
Thank you for the compliment along with expressing your concern about my sexual frustration
All I can think about is how hot Bailey is and she needs to get laid. Still saving my pennies...

Vampizoris (aka John Holmes wanna-be)