I want to point out that Bailey’s really, really important point doesn’t contradict what Victoria and others have been saying in the least, and I think it is critical to tie the two points together.
Bailey is 100% right that hobbyist/provider “connections” are not, and should never be “romantic connections”. If a hobbyist starts to imagine that their enjoyable experiences are because the provider has a special passion and desire for him above all others, that provider should immediately pour very cold water on those fantasies and/or run for the hills. We all know this is an occupational hazard, and unsurprisingly the best providers face it most often.
Victoria and others are 100% right that hobbyists can have a perfectly pleasant/acceptable experience as long as basic minimums (hygiene, courtesy, respect, safety) are met, but it takes more of an interpersonal “connection” to achieve the type of superior experience that will make a hobbyist anxious to become a regular. This involves higher levels of communication, sensitivity and professionalism as well as idiosyncratic factors (aspects of personality and style that mesh well in some cases but not others—the YMMV issue).
The common thread of course is that both Bailey and Victoria are strictly talking about a professional/commercial “connection” that can be hugely enjoyable for both parties if both parties have strong communications and physical skills, AND if both parties have the respect, maturity and sensitivity to enjoy the connections with the strict bounds of a professional/commercial relationship.
Just because this “connection” come in a commercial context and has important, defined limits doesn’t mean it isn’t real or honest. You can think of hundreds of non-hobby cases where buyers and sellers have to have extensive interpersonal interactions (dealing with professionals like doctors or auto mechanics, work situations dealing with vendors or subcontractors, etc). Nothing happens if the rudimentary hygiene/social skills aren’t there. As with providers, things fail regardless of any interpersonal chemistry if the doctor/mechanic/vendor can’t deliver the basic services expected. But if both parties have the sense and sensitivity (including openness and respect for people who may come from different social/cultural backgrounds), you can not only make the process much more enjoyable, but that enjoyable connection can greatly improve the quality of the basic services.
You cannot have a great hobby experience unless both hobbyist and provider completely understand and are totally cool with the essential professional/commercial nature of the interaction. A hobbyist-provider “connection” means you’ve established comfort and trust that the pleasure and respect will remain strictly within those bounds. If you can’t manage the boundary between fantasy and reality, it will fail. If the other party violates that boundary, run for the hills.
Posted By: transcend2007
Fellow TER’s, what is it that is most important in maximizing millage? I mean getting YMMV to work in your favor…
What factors do you think play the most important role? Is it physical attraction, age, skills, endowment, hygiene, personality, kindness, feeling safe, or perhaps its donation related?
I understand that everyone is different. But, perhaps there are some common attributes that could be helpful.