That is one of the BIG DANGERS of a Review Board such as this. The Ladies have very little recourse to almost none. Glad to see you are fighting back!

That being said, I believe that intelligent Reviewers will look at:

1.  Your Previous Reviews, where he grades you lower than anyone EVER

2. His Previous Reviews (he has only a total of three) where he gives each Lady
   the lowest grades of any who have seem them.

3. The fact that he has an “M.O.” that he is likely proud of and he obviously
   wasn’t going to violate it for you.

I think sometimes Ladies make a mistake seeing Reviewers who have the kind of “Track Record” he has, especially if the Lady is well Ranked, as are almost ALL of the Ladies I see.

I am asked often, “why do you grade so high?” The answer simply is that I only see Ladies who have received only 9’s or 10’s (occasionally some 8’s) for Performance, or are recommended to me by another Provider or Hobbyist. I also will NOT Review a Lady I can’t give and “8” or higher to for Performance.

Sometimes I think well ranked Ladies should be as discerning and NOT see Reviewers who do NOT give 9’s and 10’s!

Not many Reviewers are going to pay much attention to his negative comments, given his own description of the activities. After that description, he gives you a “6 & 8” saying “Would I see her again? Possibly, depending on the situation.”  YOU HAVE TO BE SHITTING ME!

What a Dummy he is I doubt he even saw you.

Don’t worry baby we all love.

I know I want more of you. Oh can I say that here.

Give a me a call I’m a goanna strengthen you out on a few things.

the funny thing is that Heather even sensed that he was disappointed in some way, shape or form and offered to just call it a day and "it was nice meeting you". I have done that last year with 3 women in Phoenix by just saying "it was nice meeting you and leaving". With one of them, I did notice a new outfit and actually gave her a donation for the effort which she kindly said I didnt have to but I left it anyways.

Never a dull day!!!!

Remember this, girl friend,,,,, You can't rationalize with crazy people. They just don't get it....
He is obviously an asshole. I got your back girl!

~~Brooke

And a her front a sides and her top a to bottom.




-- Modified on 4/9/2011 3:14:43 PM

You la member me when a we meet again.


-- Modified on 4/9/2011 3:17:58 PM

I have not had the pleasure of meeting Heather, but she is on my list and this one review doesn't change a thing considering all her better ones.

HOWEVER, the hassle and threats to the reviewer remind me of one of the reasons I don't usually post weak reviews.  This is supposed to be an open-discussion forum, but a weak review of a favored lady brings out some ugly sides.  

I have had at least two encounters with highly reviewed ladies that just didn't gel with me.  I passed on reviews so as not to deal with these even more negative reactions.

You are awesome, baby...and all of your other reviews tell that....

That will give you their board id
The 10% that aren't members...just arent members yet..lol

Very well said Nikita!  Instead of the White Knights jumping in to hassle and threaten the reviewer - we should all be thankful that he posted his experiences.  The lady has a lot of great reviews and it looks like this one guy didn't "click" very well.  Nothing wrong with that - it's happened (or will happen) to all of us at one time or another.  He wrote a review of HIS exerience.  From what I can see, he was a gentleman and didn't go to a discussion board to whine about what a bad time he had.  There were certain expectations that - acording to him - were not met.  Unfortunately, that happens sometimes.  And just as unfortunately in this situation - there were only two people involved and these type of things always break down into a "He said, She said" disagreement.  The majority of guys who actually read reviews before making a decission shouldn't let just one not so great review out of many great reviews sway them.    

If you were working with a scale of 1 to 5.

HH

-- Modified on 4/11/2011 9:43:57 PM