Phoenix

RE: Close enough?
Driller486 2 Reviews 432 reads
posted

I actually saw an ad a while back where the lady posted that the pictures on her website were not actually her. She had just entered into a relationship and didn't want her new man to see them if he found her website. The ad stated these picture are not actually of me but of such a close resemblance that you would think we were twins.

I see a number of reviews that will list No on Real Photo but then Yes on Accurate Photo? How can that be. If it is not the person in the photo then how can it possibly be accurate? I assumed the two categories were meant more for yes its her in the photo but then it may no longer be accurate of what she looks like?

.... I usually see that if aside from the body that the face is unblurred as well so she might not be the girl in the photo but the girl he meets is so close to the real one in the pics. So that explains it being fake but accurate I hope.  Real  and but inaccurate might not always be as bad as it sounds. Like ...it's indisputably her but she's dyed her hair or got some new piercings or tats or new boobs or something or it can be negative like looks a few (or many) yrs older or has gained a very visible x amount of weight.

Good enough explanation for me.  However if it's not the person in the photo then I will move on.  Thanks for the explanation.  Sometimes the explanation is right in front of your face like that and you just don't see it.  I had actually thought that at one point guess I just needed some verification. I'll just keep my search on Yes and Yes for both and I can avoid those for myself.  Thanks Moca for the clarification.

Posted By: MikeBMesa
I assumed the two categories were meant more for yes its her in the photo but then it may no longer be accurate of what she looks like?
I see the same thing happening all the time and agree with you that it was meant to be as you say.

Funny, I just posted yesterday on the general board about the same thing. The responses (so far) that I got were either:

1. It is not a photo of the provider, but the general appearance, body type, hair color, etc. is similar/representative of the provider.

2. Someone filed an error report about the review, and the moderator changed one of the two values without changing the other and without realizing the logical conflict it created.

I actually saw an ad a while back where the lady posted that the pictures on her website were not actually her. She had just entered into a relationship and didn't want her new man to see them if he found her website. The ad stated these picture are not actually of me but of such a close resemblance that you would think we were twins.

Register Now!